User talk:Bkonrad/Archive 86
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Bkonrad. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 80 | ← | Archive 84 | Archive 85 | Archive 86 | Archive 87 | Archive 88 | → | Archive 90 |
about cock
'Not mentioned in the article' what do you mean by that?
it is a well known fact that BBC means Big black cock, go to any porn site if you don't believe me. --Spafky (talk) 16:04, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- Disambiguation pages are not glossaries of slang usage. They are intended solely to assist readers in navigating to article content that may be ambiguously titled. If there is no content in Wikipedia that supports the claimed usage, the entry doesn't merit mentioning on the disambiguation page. older ≠ wiser 18:41, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
OS revert
Just curious, why were my changes for OS disambig reverted? TiMike (talk) 23:37, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- In many cases your edits added extra links unnecessary for disambiguation. In other cases unnecessarily piped linked to avoid using perfectly acceptable redirects. Finally you changed intentional links to disambiguation pages to direct links. older ≠ wiser 00:53, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
The MMA fight between Shogun Rua and Dan Henderson at UFC 139 was called the Fight of the Century by many media outlets
The MMA fight between Shogun Rua and Dan Henderson at UFC 139 was called the Fight of the Century by many media outlets — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.206.119.108 (talk) 06:00, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
- There's no indication of this in the article. older ≠ wiser 12:01, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Precious three years!
Three years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:27, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 May 2018
- From the editor: Another issue meets the deadline
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Portals
- Discussion report: User rights, infoboxes, and more discussion on portals
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
- Arbitration report: Managing difficult topics
- News and notes: Lots of Wikimedia
- Traffic report: We love our superheroes
- Technology report: A trove of contributor and developer goodies
- Recent research: Why people don't contribute to Wikipedia; using Wikipedia to teach statistics, technical writing, and controversial issues
- Humour: Play with your food
- Gallery: Wine not?
- From the archives: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
Queen Adelaide
Hi! What's the correct procedure for getting Queen Adelaide to redirect to Adelaide of Saxe-Meiningen? Surtsicna (talk) 15:03, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Surtsicna, you'd need to request to move Queen Adelaide to Queen Adelaide (disambiguation). As the rationale for the move, you'd need to make the case that this term qualifies as a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT. older ≠ wiser 16:09, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 May 2018
- From the editor: Another issue meets the deadline
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Portals
- Discussion report: User rights, infoboxes, and more discussion on portals
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
- Arbitration report: Managing difficult topics
- News and notes: Lots of Wikimedia
- Traffic report: We love our superheroes
- Technology report: A trove of contributor and developer goodies
- Recent research: Why people don't contribute to Wikipedia; using Wikipedia to teach statistics, technical writing, and controversial issues
- Humour: Play with your food
- Gallery: Wine not?
- From the archives: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
Removing redlink-enties
Hi! You have undone my edits on the GSN (disambiguation) disambiguation page twice, within minutes after the information was added. I think this is a bit uncalled for, especially after I explicitly stated that the article in question has been submitted for review. According to the Wikipedia:Red link article, a "red link should be allowed to remain in an article if it links to a term that could plausibly sustain an article". 194.218.229.113 (talk) 10:31, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
- Redlink-only and unlinked entries violate WP:disambiguation guidelines. If your sub-stub draft is ever accepted, the link can be added. In the meantime, I've added entry with link to an article that supports the usage. older ≠ wiser 10:35, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, fair enough. Thanks! 194.218.229.113 (talk) 11:42, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
May 2018
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Knuckle Sandwich does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 20:22, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for pointing out my mistake [1]. I didn't know about WP:DABMENTION, now I know. Regards. Cynko (talk) 18:28, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 June 2018
- Special report: NPR and AfC – The Marshall Plan: an engagement and a marriage?
- Op-ed: What do admins do?
- News and notes: Money, milestones, and Wikimania
- In the media: Much wikilove from the Mayor of London, less from Paekākāriki or a certain candidate for U.S. Congress
- Discussion report: Deletion, page moves, and an update to the main page
- Featured content: New promotions
- Arbitration report: WWII, UK politics, and a user deCrat'ed
- Traffic report: Endgame
- Technology report: Improvements piled on more improvements
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Africa
- Recent research: How censorship can backfire and conversations can go awry
- Humour: Television plot lines
- Wikipedia essays: This month's pick by The Signpost editors
- From the archives: Wolves nip at Wikipedia's heels: A perspective on the cost of paid editing
GA nomination
- Greetings!
I recently nominated Steve Smith (cricketer) as good article candidate (someone is yet to start a review). It would be great if you can review and provide your comments on that. Thanks. Binod Basnet Talk 09:04, 30 June 2018 (UTC)