User talk:Biruitorul/Archive8

Moment

Hi. Do you have any data/info to add to Moment (Bucharest)? I can't find anything. --Soman (talk) 18:56, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And do you own any records by Johnny Alexutzzu? Apparently he is all the rage. Mindy Dirt (talk) 20:15, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Pardon me for butting in. This is an interesting topic. Snippets from Google Books tell me it was published by Alfred Hefter, weekly or daily (I found both). Hefter had a funny French accent, and the paper was published also in Geneva and other places, so it sounds like an interesting expatriate kind of activist publication. I moved it to Le Moment, as suggested by the hits I got on Google Books. Mindy Dirt (talk) 20:29, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, with the Adevarul link I was able to source Hefter as the head of the party. --Soman (talk) 08:40, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think there's a Did You Know in here somewhere? You're the expert... Mindy Dirt (talk) 14:46, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sergey Mavrody

Hi Biruitorul, I think your suspicions were well placed at the AfD for Sergey Mavrody. The keep votes most likely came from paid editors. They were contracted on Elance, as you can see here. And it looks like the same Elance user is looking to buy more keep votes, as seen here.115.187.74.73 (talk) 19:32, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Biruitorul. You have new messages at Nicu farcas's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Nicu Farcas ^(talk) 10:12, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXX, November 2012

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: The month's new Featured and A-Class content
Book reviews: Sturmvogel_66, AustralianRupert, and Nick-D look at ships, soldiers, and railways
Op-ed: Nick-D on navigating the FA and A-Class review processes

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Freemasons by nationality cats

Just FYI, there is a reason we have a Freemasonry WikiProject, and you would have been able to save yourself a lot of time had you asked about this first. All these nationality cats were CfDed as overcat quite a while ago, and I would imagine at some point they're going to be CfDed again, so you've potentially wasted a lot of time doing that. MSJapan (talk) 23:11, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

content requires sources

Please stop adding categories to articles without providing a source that supports the claim. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:41, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Leonard Oprea

Hi, User:Drmies suggested that you might be a good resource to help verify some non-Englishes sources that might be useful in determining some sourcing issues for the above article (and also perhaps communicating with the creator/editor/subject(?) whose primary language is not english. Thanks for your considerations!-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 01:43ard, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Oh! Ha, I knew the intersection between you and Leonard Oprea sounded familiar... Come on Biruitorul, help us out some. You looked at this in 2006 and again in 2008... pretty please with sugar on top? Drmies (talk) 20:46, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Salut

I really don't want to go into a dispute, but I think that your recent deletions of the stuff I inserted were not justified. I was actually waiting for you to insert at least "Domenii interzise" in the article. I though that the reason for non-inclusion was that it wasn't listed in worldcat, but now I can't see a reson for deleting my addition as the mistake has been corrected in worldcat and now it is listed there as well as in numerous sources, even in those brought by you. And what is wrong with mentioning literary prizes he received in the early 80's? He lives in Auburn, Maine, and as indicated in the talk by User: Justice007 in the introduction of the article there is no need for references, but this is where he lives. In the article that you replaced this was mentioned, as well as his previous residence in Boston. Another issue (and a very important one) is the series of Theophil Magus books he published in the United States. They are listed in world cat (with some minor mistakes). They are mentioned (although not specifically) in the article from Auburn Sun that I brought as reference for residence in Auburn. This is an author who published through X-Libris as a way to get established in the US. The Wikipedia policies mention this exact case as an example that you can use self-published sources if the author also has other publications from other regular sources. This is a BLP and it has an impact in the subject's life, you can't just dismiss the work he has done in the last 10 years just because he published in X-Libris and the appreciation (from very notable people) is on the back cover. Please let me try to complete the edit and then you can adjust it if you are not happy. This guy was punished enough by the Securitate, he shouldn't have a hard time on Wiki as well. And what's wrong with the photo? Looking forward for your comments.Sensei2004 (talk) 04:06, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXXI, December 2012

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: The month's new Featured and A-Class content
Book reviews: Simon Harley on British battleships and Nick-D on the French Resistance
Interview: Five editors discuss some less-represented areas of military history
Op-ed: Ian Rose looks back on 2012

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:37, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Antonie Plămădeală, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stolniceni (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

About Romanian communes and villages

I see you delete my edits from Padeș commune. Can you tell me what is the politics of this wiki? Gexge79 (talk) 21:05, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, agree with you about villages problem, but how about the corect romanian diacritics - Ș and Ț (the other 3 ones are good, Ă, Î and Â). Can you make a bot to replace the bad diacritics with the good ones like on ro.wiki? Gexge79 (talk) 22:18, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I want to make some improvements to romanian communes from Gorj County articles. That's why i asked your advise with the diacritics, because i will try to reedit using Ș and Ț. Can you give me some more advices about how to rename artices etc.? Gexge79 (talk) 11:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weitzer railmotor and ACsEV

Hi Biruitorul, you*ve shown your finger and I catch your hand ;-)

You can't only improve the style and orthography of my texts. I think, you are predestinate to complete the contence of these articles:

How many of the ACsEV railmotors have been taken over by CFR?
How long were they in service?
Did even one or two of them "survive"?

And perhaps you can write something in ro.wiki.

Have a nice 2013!--Ulamm (talk) 22:31, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletion of the update on the nonconstitutionality of the Hungarian electoral law

I have restored (once) the update of the Hungarian Constitution page, adding the latest developments ("Temporary Provisions" in the Constitution struck down as unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court). But I have no intention of getting into an edit war. These Temporary Provisions were not only (1) found unconstitutional, but several (2) had a bearing on the electoral laws and freedom of speech, and hence on the (3) chances of opposition parties ever getting back into power (let alone (4) ever achieving the Supermajority that would be needed to overturn the new constitution). If this fact -- and the fact that as of April the Constitutional Court will be dominated by appointees of the current government (as will all judicial appointments), again thanks to constitutional changes they have used their Supermajority to enshrine in the constitution -- is not regarded as pertinent to the WP page on the Hungarian Constitution, it is not clear what fact is. Pertinent too is the fact (reflected in my heading change, which you also deleted) that the constitutional revision of 1989 was not a minor non-event in the history of the Hungarian Constitution, and that many in the opposition (and abroad) consider the 1989 constitution to be a far more democratic document than the current one. -- As to whether the conclusions of the international constitutional-law scholar and Hungary specialist, Professor Kim Lane Scheppele, are "alarmist" or a justifiable and important warning about the ongoing developments in the country, don't you think it would be better to let history judge? --Stevan Harnad 15:05, 7 January 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harnad (talk • contribs)

300th anniversary of the Romanov dynasty

Hi Biruitorul - Thanks for reaching out to me. You're right, we need an article on the 300th anniversary of the Romanov dynasty so I've started it. Looks like the ru wiki article is very comprehensive, but, though I learned it as a child, my Cyrillic translation these days is terrible. I'll start looking for en language refs to expand this article. In the meantime, how are your Cyrillic translations skills? :) --Rosiestep (talk) 02:37, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and how are you? Drmies (talk) 20:46, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For working on Leonard Oprea. Thank you very much. Drmies (talk) 17:51, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Baia Mare, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conductor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Răşinari

Hi. Why did you delete the list of natives? Did you even read it? Răşinari is just about Goga and Cioran? John Ilcuşu was Ministry of Defence, isn't that notable native? With what was Cioran for example more important? Just different domain. Both notable people born in the commune! This just pissing me off. Because of users like you we are just losing this info. You don't find it in online newspapers.

Crezi ca detii adevarul dar numai greseli faci. Doar fiindca n-au pagina pe Wikipedia in limba engleza sau chiar pe cea in limba romana, nu inseamna ca nu sunt notabili. Si cine esti tu la urma urmei sa decizie ce e notabil si ce nu e? Am observat o multime de PROD-uri adaugate de catre tine la pagini cu tenta romaneasca. Daca esti impotriva romanilor, discutam altfel. Te rog sa iti revizuiesti atitudinea. Nu mai ingreuna munca noastra. In cele mai multe cazuri nu ai avut dreptate. Cer obiectivitate de la tine si in unele cazuri in care nu te pricepi, indiferenta! Chichirichimiki (talk) 01:36, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXXII, January 2013

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: The month's new Featured and A-Class content
Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Mongol naval power
Op-ed: Crisco 1492 on war films

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:35, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Serban Nichifor

Your mention (rmv PR site) is incorrect. Serban Nichifor is an official member of the American Composers Organization Vox Novus: http://www.voxnovus.com/Members.htm . This is his official page edited by Vox Novus (New York): http://www.voxnovus.com/composer/Serban_Nichifor.htm --Phorion (talk) 14:41, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Liana Alexandra.

Guide for participants

If you wish to open a DR/N filing, click the "Request dispute resolution" button below this guide or go to Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/request for an easy to follow, step by step request form.

What this noticeboard is:

It is an early step to resolve content disputes after talk page discussions have stalled. If it's something we can't help you with, or is too complex to resolve here, our volunteers will point you in the right direction.

What this noticeboard is not:

It is not a place to deal with the behavior of other editors. We deal with disputes about article content, not disputes about user conduct.
It is not a place to discuss disputes that are already under discussion at other dispute resolution forums.
It is not a substitute for the talk pages: the dispute must have been discussed extensively on a talk page (not just through edit summaries) before resorting to DRN.
It is not a court with judges or arbitrators that issue binding decisions: we focus on resolving disputes through consensus, compromise, and explanation of policy.

Things to remember:

Discussions should be civil, calm, concise, neutral, and objective. Comment only about the article's content, not the other editors. Participants who go off-topic or become uncivil may be asked to leave the discussion.
Let the other editors know about the discussion by posting {{subst:drn-notice}} on their user talk page.
Sign and date your posts with four tildes "~~~~".
If you ever need any help, ask one of our volunteers, who will help you as best as they can. You may also wish to read through the FAQ page located here and on the DR/N talkpage.

Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you! CarrieVS (talk) 13:02, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Whack!
You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly.

"rather amusing to see a day-old account with a couple dozen edits ... an editor with just about 100,000 edits across thousands of articles over the last nearly seven years".

Not as amusing as it is to see that experienced editor releasing a tirade of irrelevant comments about that day-old account in what's clearly a heated topic. That editor ought to know better. And as for shoehorning Israel-Palestine into an unrelated discussion...

If this dispute should resurface on the article's talk page, and if you decide to participate in the discussion, keep on topic, keep your cool, and whatever he says, try and resist the urge to rise to it. If you stay calm and discuss what's relevant, it makes it easier for him and anyone else to do the same, but if you escalate, so will he. There is far too much vitriol on that page already.

I do realise that can be a tall order, but come on, Israel-Palestine? What exactly was that supposed to solve? Don't answer that. And I'm not suggesting it's all on your head, either: I have two trouts to dispense today.

As for the suggestions of who the user in question is, there are appropriate places to take that. CarrieVS (talk) 16:53, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Liana Alexandra

The relevant links of Vox Novus New York City ^[1] deleted abusively by the Romanian Biruitorul.--Phorion (talk) 14:43, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Biruitorul, I have placed comments on the Talk Pages of the dispute pages for Samuel Friedman Foundation and Richtmyer Memorial Award (not sure if you have read them as no reply). Cheers Ybidzian (talk) 15:36, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you?

Who are you? You are in connection with this?--Phorion (talk) 05:35, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If Phorion really does stay out of it, there's probably no point in trying to do anything. But if he continues behaving like this something needs doing. Far from acceptable. I don't know what the proper procedure would be, but I'll certainly back you up if it comes to asking for sanctions or something - though the comments would speak for themselves, I would imagine. CarrieVS (talk) 10:04, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Liana Alexandra edit war

I see we have a remarkably new editor wanting to add the same link that Phorion did. I have two questions:

Can we be sure it's a sockpuppet? How would you find out?
Did you know that you've broken 3RR? (Phorion and the new guy between them are either at 3, or have broken it too - not certain whether re-adding that reference counts - assuming they are the same person.)

CarrieVS (talk) 18:34, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see he's linked to a page about Serban Nichifor as being himself - that was the guy you figured Phorion was, right? If you're right that Phorion has edited under the account names you said, it looks fairly damning. CarrieVS (talk) 18:41, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Buna seara, Stimate Domn Biruitorul. Va scriu in limba romana, deoarece am vazut ca sunteti roman. Sunt compozitorul Serban NICHIFOR, Conf.Univ.Dr. la Universitatea Nationala de Muzica Bucuresti. Mai multi prieteni din USA si din Romania mi-au semnalat faptul ca pagina in limba engleza dedicata sotiei mele LIANA ALEXANDRA a suferit in ultimul timp multiple modificari. Va sunt recunoscator pentru tot ce ati sintetizat in articolul pe care i l-ati dedicat si va rog sa imi spuneti daca este posibil ca pe aceasta pagina sa apara si lista lucrarilor elaborate de ilustra compozitoare (laureata a unor importante premii nationale si internationale) care a fost sotia mea, prematur si tragic disparuta. Va pot pune oricand la dispozitie toate documentele informative necesare. Precizez faptul ca toate creatiile ei sunt in prezent pastrate la Biblioteca Academiei Romane si va pot trimite actele oficiale in acest sens. Totodata mentionez si faptul ca nu sunt familiarizat cu procedurile specifice Wikipedia - si imi cer scuze daca interventia mea nu este conforma acestor proceduri. Cu multumiri anticipate si cu deosebit respect, Serban Nichifor--Newconsonance (talk) 19:06, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You need to undo your recent reversion of the Liana Alexandra article. The current version which you have put in place is a copyright violation. Thank you. Pkeets (talk) 13:46, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Copyright violations need to be removed immediately. It's not about retaining them "for a few more hours." Pkeets (talk) 17:04, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Liana Alexandra

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Liana Alexandra, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.oxfordmusiconline.com/public/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Liana Alexandra and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Liana Alexandra, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Liana Alexandra with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Liana Alexandra. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Liana Alexandra saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Pkeets (talk) 17:36, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To Biruitorul: Daca toti agentii SRI - http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serviciul_Rom%C3%A2n_de_Informa%C8%9Bii - sunt la fel de stupizi ca tine, "Biruitorule", vai de Romania ! Ce ai realizat blocand aceasta pagina a unei mari compozitoare ? Pe cine ai "biruit" ? Ti-au dat un grad in plus ?

If all agents of the SRI - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanian_Intelligence_Service - are as stupid as you, "Biruitorul", woe to Romania! What you have done a great blocking this page of a great Romanian composer very appreciated in Israel and in USA? Now you have received a higher grade from SRI? --109.96.165.139 (talk) 10:11, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Șerban Ionescu

Hi. Could you explain how Șerban Ionescu is better than Serban Ionescu or, more appropriately, Şerban Ionescu. I don't think it's my browser. Quis separabit? 16:53, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So you acknowledge the following:

First, it looks ridiculous.
Şerban Ionescu is the correct name.
Your edit summaries regarding "absurd move" were out of line. Quis separabit? 17:10, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Serban Nichifor

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Serban Nichifor, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.oxfordmusiconline.com/public/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Serban Nichifor and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Serban Nichifor, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Serban Nichifor with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Liana Alexandra. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.--Newconsonance (talk) 12:18, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

re: Ilie Oană

Hello Biruitorul. I noticed your edit summary on this article, and I apologize if I offended you. I was using Google Translate to read the sources, and I used the term "annex" because that is what the translation suggested. I'm glad you clarified the situation and provided a wikilink for more detail. Best regards. Jogurney (talk) 00:07, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cluj-Napoca

Hi Biruitorul. You have asked for more sources, what do you mean? Do you want me to add links for each concert/festival which took place in Cluj-Napoca? The only one which is not official (yet, will probably be this week) in that list is the Sting concert, to which I have added a source which links to his number one fansite where the concert is listed this year. Is that the one for which you made an undo on my modifications? Or do you want me to add a source for all past concerts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danchiriac (talk • contribs) 16:09, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Romanian diacritics bot?

Is VoxelBot the bot we were waiting for? See [1]. Best --Codrin.B (talk) 11:48, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Teamwork Barnstar

Salutare Biruitorule, multumesc pt ajutor in apararea onoarei bacauane. Te invit sa rogi cat mai multi prieteni care ne impartasesc sentimentele si patriotismul sa intervina. Trebuie sa ii convingem pana la urma. Poate e bine sa incercam in prima faza in mod politicos, cu argumente valide, pe pagina de discutii. Daca nu iese, mai vedem. Cu respect. Fanenis (talk) 20:44, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Rugăciunile copiilor sunt mai puternice decât cele ale oamenilor mari." --Cei Trei (talk) 23:22, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

		100000 Edits
		Congratulations on reaching 100000 edits. You have achieved a milestone that very few editors have been able to accomplish. The Wikipedia Community thanks you for your continuing efforts. Keep up the good work!

If you like you can add this userbox to your collection.

This user has been awarded with the 100000 Edits award.

```Buster Seven Talk 07:17, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eduard Tumagian

Hi Biruitorul, in the last few months I have shifted my interests from history to music since my romanian is not great (I'm only part romanian but never lived there) I would first like to thank you for your help with the article Eduard Tumagian. I have a couple of CDs including songs sung by him! Anyway I was going to ask if you have time to help improve the article and find some sources in romanian. Cheers, --Cormag100 (talk) 17:46, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIII, February 2013

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content
Book reviews: Nick-D looks at US Army leadership since World War II

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:52, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request for deletion

Archbishopric of Arad listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Archbishopric of Arad. Since you had some involvement with the Archbishopric of Arad redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Ioan-Mihai Gale I (talk) 01:31, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Professor Scheppele's analysis and the government's supermajority

‎Biruitorul, you deleted the following direct quote from Princeton University international constitutional law scholar and Hungary specialist Kim Lane Scheppele saying "how about waiting until the amendment actually passes, and then using a source that isn't alarmist soapboxing?"

I re-instated it, and Koertefa re-deleted it.

Do you and Koertefa consider writings by constitutional law scholars to be soap-boxing?

In whose interest is it to suppress scholarly analysis and criticism of a proposed constitutional mega-amendment with enormous consequences until after it has been passed by a government with the supermajority sufficient to have passed the constitution itself plus every one of hundreds of subsequent amendments in the ensuing years?

In March 2013, Princeton University international constitutional law scholar and Hungary specialist Kim Lane Scheppele writes^[2]:

"[T]the government is… introducing into the Parliament a 15-page constitutional… mega-amendment... a toxic waste dump of bad constitutional ideas, many of which were introduced before and nullified by the Constitutional Court or changed at the insistence of European bodies. The new constitutional amendment (again) kills off the independence of the judiciary, brings universities under (even more) governmental control, opens the door to political prosecutions, criminalizes homelessness, makes the recognition of religious groups dependent on their cooperation with the government and weakens human rights guarantees across the board. Moreover, the constitution will now buffer the government from further financial sanctions by permitting it to take all fines for noncompliance with the constitution or with European law and pass them on to the Hungarian population as special taxes, not payable by the normal state budget.

"For good measure, the mega-amendment adds a new and nasty twist. It annuls all of the decisions made by the Court before 1 January 2012 so that they have no legal effect. Now, no one in the country – not the Constitutional Court, not the ordinary courts, not human rights groups or ordinary citizens – can rely any longer on the Court’s proud string of rights-protecting decisions...

"The amendment reverses virtually all of the concessions that the government has been forced to make over the last year, and it provides further evidence that Prime Minister Viktor Orbán recognizes no limits on his power."

Stevan Harnad 19:46, 4 March 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harnad (talk • contribs)

Stevan Harnad 19:55, 4 March 2013 (UTC) Harnad (talk • contribs)

re: Poverty in Poland

Thanks. I am not sure if I feel like working on this article beyond start level in the near future, but if you'd care to help out, I'd love to see some of your work there :) Personally I'd rather start another "poverty in...", article, we need so many of those. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:21, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ovidiu Raetchi

Iti respect decizia de a reduce articolul dar ai scos cateva informatii importante din articol si nefiind la fel de experimentat ca tine as vrea sa stiu de ce. Ma refer la faptul ca Raetchi este reprezentantul romanilor din Orientul Mijlociu-Africa, nu din diaspora, asa cum ai generalizat; ai scos denumirile cartilor sale; si partea in care se specifica relatia cu tarile arabe: faptul ca este presedintele grupuluui parlamentar de prietenie cu tarile arabe sau ca sustine opozitia siriana. ai scos denumirile integrale ale comisiilor parlamentare si informatia referitoare la iq-ul, limbile vorbite si faptul ca a incercat sa popularizeze teologia. toate acestea aveau surse si sunt verificabile fara a pune cumva in pericol neutralitatea articolului. Inteleg insa decizia de a exclude rubrica de controverse, aceasta fiind poate neenciclopedica. Sunt destul de nou intr-ale wikipediei dar as vrea sa contribui cu articole in continure, motiv pentru care, pentru a invata, te rog sa imi detaliezi putin motivele care te-au facut sa iei decizia asta.

Multumesc mult! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marchallnay (talk • contribs) 14:57, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Am citit. Mersi mult! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marchallnay (talk • contribs) 21:57, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pagina in limba engleza a pianistului Ferdinand Weiss

Buna ziua. Am vazut ca ati editat pagina in limba engleza a pianistului si profesorului Ferdinand Weiss, creata de mine cu o zi inainte. As dori sa inteleg de ce modificarile aduse de dumneavoastra au prioritate inaintea felului in care am inteles eu sa editez acest articol. Exista vreo anumita ierarhie in ce priveste autoritatea contributorilor? Faptul ca am editat un singur articol ma face mai putin relevant pentru wikipedia decat o persoana care se ocupa regulat cu editarea de articole? - Mai concret m-ar interesa de ce ati elimiat de pe pagina referintele la inregistrarile pianistului Weiss postate pe youtube? Am citit regulile si nu inteleg totusi motivul, cu atat mai mult cu cat astfel de linkuri sunt prezente pe multe pagini wikipedia. - Ce anume va spune ca Ferdinand Weiss trebuie sa faca parte din categoria "Romanian Jews"? - In ce sens va deranjeaza formularea "well-known pianist" atata timp cat este adevarata? - de ce considerati articolul ca fiind lipsit de referinte atat timp cat exista atat citate si referinta spre sursa lor, cat si alte surse de informatie in "Further reading" Va multumesc anticipat pentru un raspuns promt. Rares Micu — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raresoft (talk • contribs) 21:57, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Va multumesc pentru raspunsul prompt. Am inteles acum ratiunile care au dus la modificarile facute de dumneavoastra. As vrea sa va intreb ce anume ar trebui sa modific concret la capitolul "Artistic career" pentru a putea elimina flag-ul "refimprove"? Sursa informatiilor enuntate in acel capitol este Memoriul de activitate depus la Academia de Muzica Gherorghe Dima din Cluj-Napoca, mentionat in capitolul "Further readings". Ar fi o solutie includerea sa ca capitolul referinte? S-ar putea sa fi facut eu o confuzie intre capitolul Bibliografie si "Further reading" sau "References". Dupa aceasta imbunatatire, pot elimina flagul "refimprove"? Va multumesc din nou anticipat.

Rares Micu — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raresoft (talk • contribs) 23:38, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, va multumesc din nou. Am sa ma mai documentez putin si am sa incerc sa adaptez partea de referinte conform cerintelor. Doar o intrebare mai am: cat timp am la dispozitie inainte ca articolul sa fie sters din aceasta cauza? Multumesc.

Rares Micu — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raresoft (talk • contribs) 12:59, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, multumesc! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raresoft (talk • contribs) 17:11, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pope Francis

Interesting news! Check out the Pope Francis page. The traffic and edit warring is tremendous at this time. --Codrin.B (talk) 20:07, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unirea

ACUM ORI NICIODATĂ!

Duminică, 24 martie, ora 14:00, în fața Universității Alexandru Ioan Cuza din Iași, ne întâlnim pentru a sărbători unul dintre cele mai importante momente din istoria contemporană a României, revenirea Basarabiei alături de Țara Mamă.

Anul acesta se împlinesc 95 de ani de la Unirea Basarabiei cu România (27 martie 1918). Ieșenii întotdeauna au fost alături de frații lor de peste Prut. Să arătăm încă o dată acest lucru și să cerem revenirea Basarabiei acasă! Viitorul Unirii sta în noi. Vom reuși doar dacă arătăm că suntem o forță!

Pentru mine, pentru tine, pentru noi, ne vedem cu toții duminică pentru a arăta ca UNIREA E VIE!

Manifestația este organizată de Platforma Civică „Acțiunea 2012” alături de alte organizații care susțin UNIREA. Marșul va porni din fața Universității Alexandru Ioan Cuza, vom coborî bulevardul Carol I, apoi mica străduță Lăpușneanu pentru a ajunge în punctul final - Piața Unirii.

UNIREA face PUTEREA! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cei Trei (talk • contribs) 08:09, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hungarian Constitutional Amendments, International Criticism, and POV Neutrality

For a neutral POV on an important ongoing international development like the new Hungarian constitution, its amendments, and the international criticisms of the constitution and its amendments, it is not sufficient to summarize the government's view and simply state that there has also been international criticism. The summary of the government's points have to be balanced with a summary of the points being made by the critics. Editors can elaborate the summaries if they wish, but please refrain from deleting the summaries of the other side. Stevan Harnad Harnad (talk)

Biruitorul: I wrote a balanced summary of the recent amendment to the Hungarian constitution: one paragraph of description, one of criticism.

Harnad: The summary is unfortunately far from balanced. It states the Hungarian government's point of view and allows that there were some points of controversy. The substance and evidence behind the points of controversy is left out. Those missing substantive points are exactly the ones Professor Scheppele made -- most recently at the Washington Helsinki Commission Hearing in Washington last week^[3]. And those are the points Biruitorul keeps deleting, even though, word for word, they are no longer than his pro-governnment summary. I first posted the points as a direct quote. Then the objection was against long direct quotes instead of summaries, so I replaced them by a light paraphrase. Then that was deleted too.

Biruitorul: Given the size of the rest of the article, I think this is an appropriate dimension. Also, this is not that significant of an event - yes, it's important, but it isn't, as Harnad claims, an "important, ongoing historic event... gaining more and more attention and weight worldwide". With all due respect, the last time anyone really cared about internal developments in Hungary was the Ajka alumina plant accident.

Harnad: I think the daily growing international press attention, EU and US governmental attention and academic attention to the new Hungarian constitution is ample evidence that there is indeed worldwide concern about internal developments in Hungary.

Biruitorul: I vociferously object to the inclusion of the blog post in question. For one, no matter how many times Harnad repeats the phrase "International constitutional scholar and Hungary specialist, Professor Kim Lane Scheppele", that does not automatically mean we should be quoting her. And it's slightly misleading to say the comments appeared on "Nobel Laureate Paul Krugman's New York Times Blog"; there is Paul-Krugman-as-economist, and there is Paul Krugman-as-politically-opinionated-individual, and it's the latter who mainly runs the blog. The comments are partisan in tone, they are on a blog (i.e., not peer reviewed), they are editorial content - in short, they are not relevant to the topic.

Harnad: Professor Scheppele's analysis has also been presented to Senator Cardin's Committee (last week) and is now published in the record of the US Helsinki Commision^[4] (Critiques by others have also been published in the official working documents of the European Parliament^[5]^[6]^[7]^[8] and by the Venice Commission on Hungary^[9].)

Biruitorul: And I'd like to point out that Harnad has spread around the exact same blog quote at Second Cabinet of Viktor Orbán, Politics of Hungary, Constitutional Court of Hungary, Fidesz, Viktor Orbán and, most ludicrously, given that it covers 2000 years, History of Hungary.

Harnad: I don't know what WP policy is about information that is pertinent to multiple articles. Cross-referring might be a solution, but I think the passages are short enough so it is more useful and informative to include them at the appropriate point of each of these articles. (And, yes, I would say that the Hungarian constitutional controversy is pertinent to the history of Hungary too. It would be good to hear other views on that, though. Please let's keep the question of whether the critiques of the new Hungarian Constitution should appear in the article about the new Hungarian Constitution separate from the question of what other articles they should also appear in.)

Biruitorul: Does Kim Lane Scheppele (note the red link) really have to be mentioned in all those articles? I happen to care about the article on the Constitution the most because I wrote it (and no, I'm not claiming I own it, but it's natural I should care), but this should be addressed. Harnad's strong feelings on the topic shouldn't be making a soapbox out of a whole spectrum of articles. - Biruitorul ^Talk 16:17, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Harnad: Biruitorul may have written most of the Constitution of Hungary article, but a new Hungarian Constitution has been written recently, and an internationally controversial one. And, yes, Professor Scheppele ^[10] ^[11] ^[12] ^[13] is probably today's foremost expert on international constitutional law and the new Hungarian Constitution. Why on earth should the summary of the main points of her critique -- now being consulted and discussed worldwide -- be deleted from the WP article about the Constitution of Hungary? --Stevan Harnad 01:06, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "Constitution of Hungary".

Guide for participants

If you wish to open a DR/N filing, click the "Request dispute resolution" button below this guide or go to Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/request for an easy to follow, step by step request form.

What this noticeboard is:

It is an early step to resolve content disputes after talk page discussions have stalled. If it's something we can't help you with, or is too complex to resolve here, our volunteers will point you in the right direction.

What this noticeboard is not:

It is not a place to deal with the behavior of other editors. We deal with disputes about article content, not disputes about user conduct.
It is not a place to discuss disputes that are already under discussion at other dispute resolution forums.
It is not a substitute for the talk pages: the dispute must have been discussed extensively on a talk page (not just through edit summaries) before resorting to DRN.
It is not a court with judges or arbitrators that issue binding decisions: we focus on resolving disputes through consensus, compromise, and explanation of policy.

Things to remember:

Discussions should be civil, calm, concise, neutral, and objective. Comment only about the article's content, not the other editors. Participants who go off-topic or become uncivil may be asked to leave the discussion.
Let the other editors know about the discussion by posting {{subst:drn-notice}} on their user talk page.
Sign and date your posts with four tildes "~~~~".
If you ever need any help, ask one of our volunteers, who will help you as best as they can. You may also wish to read through the FAQ page located here and on the DR/N talkpage.

Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you! CarrieVS (talk) 12:50, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIV, March 2013

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content
Book reviews: Nick-D looks at refugees during the Battle of France
Interview: Editors discuss writing articles about the former Yugoslavia
Op-ed: Prioryman on German V-weapon sites and the historian's responsibility

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:24, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe self-proclaimed naming and advocacy?

Help please! We're in a bit of a pickle here and here. Thank uou for your brief attention. --Septimus Wilkinson (talk) 00:09, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe self-proclaimed naming and advocacy?

Help please! We're in a bit of a pickle here and here. Thank uou for your brief attention. --Septimus Wilkinson (talk) 00:09, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Barro

Hi Biruitorul, this is Josh Barro. I'm writing an article about the discussion on deleting my Wikipedia page and was hoping I could ask you a few questions. If you'd be willing to chat, could you please email me at jbarro1@bloomberg.net? Poshua (talk) 13:41, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Constitution of Hungary DRN filing

A proposal to close the filing as stale has been floated at WP:DRN and in less than 48 hours will be acted upon unless there is significant objection. Please consider if the dispute is still active and respond if appropriate. Hasteur (talk) 03:18, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Files missing description details

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 09:17, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CasinoWebScripts

I removed the {{db-repost}} tag you placed on CasinoWebScripts because the page was deleted because of a speedy deletion tag and not as a result a discussion. smtchahal^(talk) 14:59, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I also removed the {{db-spam}} tag because the article does not really look like it's been written in a purely promotional tone. smtchahal^(talk) 15:02, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

vezi ce idiot esti, "biruitorule" de cacat !--213.233.101.67 (talk) 16:13, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

^hahaha! --Cei Trei (talk) 18:18, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ion Jinga Biography

Hi. I've realised that you have removed a section from my contribuiton to the Ion Jinga biography with reference to a possible BLP issue or vandalism. I am still trying to familiarize myself with the wiki guidelines and I have modified the text. I am quite familiar with the particular issue and I feel that the contribution is incomplete as it is at the moment. I am thus adding a reviewed text. Please, if I do not follow the BLP guidelines to the letter feel free to modify my section but please do let me know which element I need to improve upon as I love the way in which wikipedia works and I am really trying to do my best. I am also quite informed about the story and I would hope to contribuite to it in order to make it both complete and comprehensive for the readers. Thank you for your review and potential future comments.

AcBaib

The Bugle: Issue LXXXV, April 2013

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content
Book reviews: Sturmvogel 66 and Hawkeye7 look at aspects of the Pacific War
Op-ed: ErrantX considers the rabbit hole of research

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:48, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

email dahn and tell him to be more active on wikipedia. it's not like he got 3 years in jail. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cei Trei (talk • contribs) 15:41, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVI, May 2013

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content
Book reviews: Dumelow on the French Foreign Legion and Nick-D on New Zealand military history
Op-ed: Nick-D on military history tourism

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:42, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Buna ziua

Va rog sa lasati textul respective cateva zile. Am nevoie pentru nota la facultate. E important. Multumesc! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Denissageorgiana (talk • contribs) 13:31, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVII, June 2013

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content
Book reviews: Works on the RNZAF, World War I in the Baltic, and British battleship construction
Op-ed: Anchors Aweigh for the Majestic Titans

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:19, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Casimcea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Qasim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Malnaş

I definitely have no pleasure in a sterile discussion with you. But I suggested and you agreed that the dispute should be settled following a discussion in which wikipedians find a consensus. Until then, please refrain from vandalizing articles I am working on. And if you merge them, please refrain from eliminating information which you do not find relevant but which could be of some importance to other readers. If there is a discussion which indicates that a consensus has been reached, please indicate where it can be found. Otherwise please refrain from taking dictatorial decisions which are not justified by an accepted Wikipedia policy.Afil (talk) 04:13, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Andreea Bănică

Please add template on this article. --Kolega2357 (talk) 15:14, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request to take part in a survey

Hi there. I would very much appreciate it if you could spend ~2 minutes and take a short survey - a project trying to understand why the most active Wikipedia contributors (such as yourself) may reduce their activity, or retire. I sent you an email with details, if you did not get it please send me a wikiemail, so that I can send you an email with the survey questions. I would very much appreciate your cooperation, as you are among the most active Wikipedia editors who show a pattern of reduced activity, and thus your response would be extremely valuable. Thanks! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:20, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Biruitorul. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVIII, July 2013

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content
Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Australia's frontier wars
Interview: What Wikimedia chapters can offer military history editors

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:56, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Chamber of Commerce and Industry France Moldova

Hello Biruitorul. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Chamber of Commerce and Industry France Moldova, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. Ged UK 12:11, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Regulamentul Organic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pandur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Petru of Moldavia

I have difficulties understanding why you refuse to be uptodate in questions related to Romanian history. Recent historical research has found that after Bodgan I of Moldavia, the voivodate of Moldavia was first taken over by his grandson Petru, who is therefore entitled to be Petru I of Moldavia. The information you are quoting is unfortunately for you outdated. Dont bother to respond. Instead, try to learn more about the history of Romania.Afil (talk) 21:07, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orăștioara de Sus and many others

Hi there! I noticed you started to add a lot of Hungarian names to Romanian villages, such as Orăștioara de Sus. Could you please remind me which WP rules require that? Does the village need to have a certain linguistic minority level before you can do that? Most of the modified articles seem to have no census that. Best--Codrin.B (talk) 08:23, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

KISA (NGO)

Back in October 2012 you PRODded this, and it was deleted. Undeletion has been requested at WP:REFUND, so per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider AfD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:25, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIX, August 2013

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content
Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the death of Osama bin Laden
Op-ed: Sturmvogel_66 presents his secrets of prolific contribution

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:32, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Joyce Evidis

The so-called "eye roll" was not an explicit edit summary (we are not mind readers), but the new edit summary makes things clear. "Please" was simply uninformative. I was not going to sit around all day waiting for insight to strike after reading simply "please". As you say yourself, "clear now"? — O'Dea (talk) 12:18, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Copley statue.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:Copley statue.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 00:33, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill ^[talk] 16:11, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXXXX, September 2013

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content
Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the American Civil War

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:28, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Moldovan communes

Pretty sad isn't it that it' s taken 4 years for anybody to add any meaningful content to Fundul Galbenei...♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:22, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vâlcea County, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roma (people) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

încăpățânare

Ești un hater, invidios fără minte. Ce plm te încurcă articolul ăla? Cât de frustrat poți să fii să te legi de tot fleacul? Eu pur și simplu nu o duc prea bine cu engleza, dar Mihai Burciu e una din cele mai proeminente personalități din sportul moldav, și în loc să distrugi și să vandalizezi mai bine ai ajuta la crearea articolului. --XXN (talk) 22:00, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Aesop Dekker

Hello Biruitorul. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Aesop Dekker, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Being or having been member of a notable band indicates importance/significance. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:03, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aesop Dekker

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Aesop Dekker, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, please to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion if you feel it should be deleted. 79.117.183.247 (talk) 06:06, 14 October 2013 (UTC) 79.117.183.247 (talk) 06:06, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GDR mass orgs

Hi, thanks. Yes, I saw your recent edits of membership figures, great. I'm a bit tied up off-wiki this week, mainly doing casual editing for now, I'll see if I'm able to engage in some article creations or expansions. --Soman (talk) 13:36, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I started GDR Union of Journalists‎, based on your advice. --Soman (talk) 17:11, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Soimus back and forth

This thing with the soimus link, you removing and me reading it, is somewhat infuriating to me, because I legitimately think that link is relevant, I don't know if you have actually visited the website, but it has data on it relevant to Soimus on it. I tried to generate a discussion about it on the talk page, but you wouldn't respond, and would just remove the link without saying anything. and of course now you threatened to report me, it is all very passive aggressive. I would far rather have a civil discussion on the pros/cons, if you made a good argument as to why you think it is irrelevant then I would be swayed, but so far you have given no real justification for removing the link. Please lets have a debate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GrassHopHer (talk • contribs) 15:59, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue XCI, October 2013

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content
Book reviews: Nick-D looks Austro-Hungarian battleships of World War I
Op-ed: Advice on reviewing Featured and A-Class articles

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:11, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Biruitorul. You have new messages at Andrei Stroe's talk page.
Message added 16:57, 14 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

- Andrei (talk) 16:57, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue XCII, November 2013

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content
Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at US industry in World War II
Op-ed: AustralianRupert offers a soldier's perspective on editing Wikipedia

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 06:19, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of local administrative units of Romania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Smârdan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Adventures of Fakirbakir

Hi Biruitorul, because you are more experienced than me and perhaps wiser, I would ask you an advice about the stubbornness of Fakirbakir regarding his last reverts on History of Transylvania. -- Saturnian (talk) 20:20, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of the most common surnames in Europe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stan (surname) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Alexandru Ioan Cuza Dealul Patriarhiei.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:36, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:ArchStreetBos.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:09, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Biserica Patriarhiei1.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:30, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Biserica Slobozia.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:34, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:BulfinchUrn.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:30, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue XCIII, December 2013

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content
Book reviews: Carcharoth and Hawkeye7 look at World War I cemeteries and the British Army in World War II
Interview: Less-represented areas of military history – part 2
Op-ed: TomStar81 and Nick-D look back on 2013 and ahead to 2014

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:26, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AfD-notice

Hi. You probably already know about {{AfD-notice}}. I recently spotted a couple of AfDs where you didn't notify the article creators, as advised at WP:AFD. One case was a new user who hadn't yet been welcomed to the project. Maybe you've notified in the past and these were simply missed out, but I thought I'd mention it anyway. Hope you don't mind. Cheers. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 12:25, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Emil Rebreanu

On 23 December 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Emil Rebreanu, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the experience of Emil Rebreanu, an Austro-Hungarian Romanian military officer executed during World War I, inspired his brother Liviu to write the novel Forest of the Hanged? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Emil Rebreanu. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop vandalizing!

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Neagu Djuvara. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you.--Keshetsven (talk) 03:03, 23 December 2013 (UTC) Check the official website.[reply]

Why are you blocking constuctive edits on Cluj, Biruitorul ?? Stop it! You seem to be another anti-Hungarian pro-Ceausescu provocateur? You should know the reasons why Hungarians are now in a minority in their own city, which was up until 1960 Hungarian majority city. Kolozsvár IS the legitimate other name for this Transylvanian city. This is NOT vandalising, it is FACT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.89.201.254 (talk) 14:35, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! Greetings, --Norden1990 (talk) 21:45, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Job

Salut,
știu că-ți place să ștergi pagini pentru lipsă de notabilitate... Ai putea să te uiți aici Wikipedia talk:Notability#Notability, am postat o listă de vreo 20 de biserici și moschee dubioase de prin Albania și Tunisia. IMHO, majoritatea din ele n-au ce căuta aici. Pe wikipedia română, luna trecută au fost șterse vreo 40 de articole de mănăstiri pentru lipsă de notabilitate (inclusiv cele mai renumite mănăstiri din Republica Moldova). Cred că și astea ar cădea sub incidența acestei reguli minunate) Deci, acolo unde am scris, mi s-a sugerat să etichetez articolele. Eu nu prea cunosc etichetele de pe enwiki, și cu engleza nu stau excelent. Ai putea să te uiți tu prin ele să vezi ce-i dânsele? Articolele astea sunt create de userul Dr. Blofeld. El are create peste 40000 de articole. Sunt încrezut că dacă te înfoi tu în articolele lui, vre-un procent din ele riscă să fie șterse)) Eu cred în tine. Baftă. XXN (talk) 19:20, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese School in Bucharest

Hi! I'm not sure if PROD tags require you to notify the original author, but I would appreciate it next time if I was notified that one of the articles I started is being PRODed.

Secondly I have discovered that international schools tend to almost always have secondary sources, even if the international school doesn't cover high school level. In the case of Japanese School in Bucharest it probably only covers elementary and junior high. However at here. I'm looking into finding secondary sources in Japanese.

Also on the Romanian side I can imagine newspapers cover the school. Articles may be like "look what the Japanese do differently!" or "here's the practices of the international schools here." Some example articles:

Humaira, Ansari. "In this slice of Japan, a dash of Mumbai masala." (Archive) Daily News and Analysis (DNA). Thursday 12 June 2008.

Japanese School of Mumbai

Lyman, Rick. "THE JAPANESE WAY IN A QUIET NEW YORK SCHOOL, 463 CHILDREN OF JAPAN'S CORPORATE ELITE GET A PROPER EDUCATION." The Philadelphia Inquirer. April 22, 1988. C01 Features Daily Magazine. Retrieved on January 9, 2012.

The Japanese School of New York

White, Betsy. "School in Atlanta skips Saturdays Japanese youngsters here enjoy community instead." Atlanta Journal-Constitution. September 12, 1992. A7.

Seigakuin Atlanta International School

I wouldn't be surprised to see this kind of article from a Bucharest newspaper. WhisperToMe (talk) 19:14, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

While it's a good thing that you used AFD when you disagree with removing a PROD, I would have appreciated being notified. Anyway, the guideline for PROD is that ideally the article creator should be notified unless the article creator is no longer editing: Wikipedia:PROD: "The article's creator or other significant contributors should ideally be left a message at their talk page(s) informing them of the proposed article deletion, except for cases where contributors are no longer regarded as active editors on Wikipedia. This should be done by adding the (TWINKLE??)" tag - And AFD says that while it's not required the article creator may be notified: Wikipedia:AFD#After_nominating:_Notify_interested_projects_and_editors

WhisperToMe (talk) 04:45, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject International relations/Bilateral relations task force

Wikipedia:WikiProject International relations/Bilateral relations task force, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject International relations/Bilateral relations task force and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject International relations/Bilateral relations task force during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. And Adoil Descended (talk) 22:37, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Iosif Vulcan

On 8 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Iosif Vulcan, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Iosif Vulcan changed the name of a young literary debutant to Mihai Eminescu, later Romania's national poet? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Iosif Vulcan. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Herman Leonard may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Leonard's parents, Joseph Leonard and Rose Morrison, were [[Romania|n [[Jews|Jewish]] immigrants who emigrated from [[Iaşi]] to the [[United States]].<ref name=

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:43, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add ethnic or religious categories to our biographical articles, as you did to Benedict Freedman, without reliable sources that explain the significance of this categorization to the notability of the subject and without textual support for the category within the article itself. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:55, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue XCIV, January 2014

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content
Book reviews: Nick-D, Zawed and Hawkeye7 look at recent releases

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Salut,
când ai timp revezi contribuțiile lui User: Anonimu. Îmi pare mie că el încearcă să manipuleze cu opinia publică, și de fapt nu ar fi cela drept cine se dă. XXN (talk) 00:38, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bridges Are Born for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bridges Are Born is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridges Are Born until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Giant Snowman 11:53, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Salutare,

Eu am editat si creat pagina "Bridges Are Born" pe care tu ai raportat-o. te rog sa iti justifici actiunea. Sunt de acord ca necesita updatata, dar nu cunosc argumentul pentru actiunea ta. Daca ai nevoie de date, te rog contacteaza-ma. User:Andyar85 —Preceding undated comment added 15:01, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages

Thank you for your recent articles, including Octavian Smigelschi, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. This can help you too, as the WikiProject members will often defend your work from deletion and try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 16:01, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Ianţu Virgil

Hello Biruitorul. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ianţu Virgil, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not previously been deleted via a deletion discussion. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:12, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Octavian Codru Tăslăuanu

On 5 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Octavian Codru Tăslăuanu, which you created or substantially expanded. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Octavian Codru Tăslăuanu. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:13, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adrian Sînă

You previously moved Adrian Sina to Adrian Sînă. Just a heads up that a now-blocked user cut-and-pasted the article back to Adrian Sina. I've slapped a HISTMERGE on the page but thought you might want to know. — AjaxSmack 01:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ribnita sub-district listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ribnita sub-district. Since you had some involvement with the Ribnita sub-district redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Androoox (talk) 08:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rîbniţa sub-district listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rîbniţa sub-district. Since you had some involvement with the Rîbniţa sub-district redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Androoox (talk) 09:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Diacritics

Regarding this - are you sure, per WP:COMMONNAME? I regret to say that I've created an article for which I have a conflict of interest because I've played rugby with the guy and indeed still know him well. He doesn't use the diacritic, nor do the sources. I admit that there may be Romanian sources out there that do use it for him or for others with the Raducanu name but (a) the man has spent more time in the UK than he ever spent in Romania and (b) doesn't COMMONNAME apply to Romanian people, as it usually does for Indian people? - Sitush (talk) 08:32, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Per the recent Comana, Giurgiu article edits, the following is how the article appeared as far back as June 2013 (see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Comana,_Giurgiu&diff=560355319&oldid=545029563):

Comana is a commune in Giurgiu County, Romania. It is composed of five villages: Comana, Vlad Ţepeş, Budeni, Falaştoaca and Grădiştea.

Comana monastery was founded by Vlad Ţepeş in 1461, and is possibly the site of his tomb. It was demolished and rebuilt from scratch in 1589 by Radu Șerban of Coiani, future prince of Wallachia. The new monastery measured 61 x 56 m and was fortified with a defensive walls and five towers. It was repaired in 1700 by Serban Cantacuzino, and again in the 18th and 19th centuries. The foundation of the original monastery by Vlad Ţepeş was only rediscovered in 1861, by Ioan Brezoianu, and by 1960 a separate village named for Vlad had sprung up, situated 4 km west of Comana.[2]

Also located in Comana municipality is Comana Nature Park.

1) Information on the Comana Monastery is provided in the June 2013 version of the article. Its deletion is not required by Wikipedia policy simply because a specific Wikipedia article exists for the Comana Monastery.

2) 3 photos of the Comana Monastery are present in the June 2013 version of the article.

3) The majority of English speakers throughout the world are NOT familiar with the Romanian language and its use of non-English punctuation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marrowstonia (talk • contribs) 03:11, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I came here because someone reported User:Marrowstonia at AIV. Regarding the proper accents to use on a player's name, generally the player is the final judge of that (if his wishes can be determined). If not, we would tend to follow reliable sources of the country where he plays. For a recent example see Talk:Carlos Tevez#Requested move. To solve a disagreement over accents anyone could open a WP:RM. EdJohnston (talk) 04:36, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Octavian Smigelschi

On 13 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Octavian Smigelschi, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Octavian Smigelschi's depiction of the Three Magi in the Romanian Orthodox cathedral in Sibiu may have been inspired by portraits of actual princes who ruled in the three Romanian provinces? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Octavian Smigelschi. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of settlements in Covasna County, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Norica Nicolai

Hi there,

Just to let you know, we're a team of interns updating wiki profiles of several MEPs from several political groups. We're trying to add as much content as possible and reference it and we'd appreciate it if, when deleting or undoing our edits, you can let us know what exactly it is that we need to improve. Yes, we are in Brussels and yes we use also info directly from MEPs, but we're trying to provide accurate, updated info on their activities. Thank you for your help!

Robert — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.173.162.144 (talk) 11:25, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proper links

Is the acceptable version Romanian or Romanian becuase you changed it from romanian people to romania on Vasile Tcaciuc. Is there a proper one. AndySherwood (talk)

DYK for Călan steel works

On 22 February 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Călan steel works, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that scrap metal dealers who took apart the remains of the Călan steel works sorted and sold the metal on the works' grounds? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Călan steel works. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCV, February 2014

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content
Book reviews: Rabaul in World War II and Australia in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:45, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Galați County Prefecture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ruse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ionel Sinescu

Hello! I just wanted to let you know I'm not going to "request" any move at that page. It's absurd. The name is incorrect. If you want proof, you can check the official page of the Center for Urological Surgery (Fundeni Institute). I warmly invite you to do so and convince yourself. You can do that here.

I checked the third-party sources 5 times each and on 3 different browsers. I received errors at 8 out of 11 sources mentioned in the article. In addition, the information suggested by those web sites could not be verified and was deleted. --Winter^eu (user talk) 21:52, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of Swedish-speaking and bilingual municipalities of Finland

Hi Biruitorul,

Considering that you and I are both such active Wikipedia editors, I'm surprised that it has taken us this long to cross paths. I like the List of Swedish-speaking and bilingual municipalities of Finland you translated and had promoted to featured list status. Considering that it has been seven years since then and there has been little change to the article over that time, I thought that I would do some work on it. I've added images of the various municipal coats of arms and done some other cleanup work. I hope that you approve. I was wondering what you might think of expanding the list to include the municipalities of Finland in which Sami languages are official. These municipalities are already identified in the map included in the lead; all we would need to do would be to add the municipalities to the table and rename the article something like List of municipalities of Finland in which Finnish is not the sole official language. Your thoughts on this matter would be greatly appreciated.

Neelix (talk) 19:45, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Biruitorul,

I'm glad you're interested in revisiting this article! Would you mind making the statistics changes to the lead? I feel like you know those numbers better than I do.

There must be a way to get around having to create a new section for the Sami entries. Perhaps we could rename the "Swedish-speaking percentage" column to "Percentage of population speaking official language other than Finnish". I feel like we can overcome the language code issue by getting rid of the codes; it's such a narrow table with so much space available that we might as well spell out "Monolingually Swedish", "Swedish majority, Finnish minority", "Finnish majority, Swedish minority", and "Finnish majority, Sami minority". What do you think?

I agree that the title you suggest is shorter than my suggestion, but I have two concerns: 1) I think that the title should be consistent with Municipalities of Finland rather than using the form "Finnish municipalities", and 2) "List of not..." sounds like an awkward construction to me. I would be glad for your further thoughts on this matter. It is good to be collaborating with you.

Neelix (talk) 01:09, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Biruitorul,

Thank you very much for your flexibility with this article. I have made the changes I proposed, adding the Sami languages and restructuring the article accordingly. I am considering nominating the article for a Today's Featured List slot on the main page. Would you be willing to look over the article and see if anything else needs to be altered before I do so? I am particularly unsure about the percentages for the Sami minorities, whether or not the municipalities with Sami as an official language follow the same 8% or 3,000-speaker rules, and whether there is a more recent source than the 2011 one from which to derive the statistics. Your input on these matters would be greatly appreciated. Thanks again!

Neelix (talk) 17:18, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Biruitorul,

I greatly appreciate your updates to this article. I was wondering about the statement that Lohja is the only municipality to make use of the special provision; only 5.9% of the population of Helsinki is Swedish-speaking, so does Helsinki also make use of the special provision as well? I wanted to ask before I nominate the list for a main page slot, which I intend to do soon.

Neelix (talk) 21:03, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Biruitorul,

That makes sense to me. I have updated the lead of the article accordingly.

Neelix (talk) 23:24, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

a request

I saw that Talk:Arsen Mikayelyan (Armenian diplomat) was recently deleted, as orphaned talk page. I worked on half a dozen or so BLPs of public figures from Nagorno-Karabakh, a Caucasian region that claims to be an independent state, but which is only recognized by Armenia, and the dozen or so other unrecognized states.

I had come across a mass AFD, for about a dozen of these individuals, and before I weighed in, I complied with [[WP:BEFORE}], and concluded that while about half those individuals were totally unknown, the others were either marginally notable or were firmly notable.

I put in quite a few hours on those articles.

Anyhow, I saw that you had been the contributor who nominated the Arsen Mikayelyan article for deletion, back in November 2013. But there was no notice on my talk page that you made that nomination. That was puzzling, as the deletion policy recommends informing the contributor who started the article, and/or its major contributors, when one nominates an article for deletion.

Not everyone understands that complying with this advice is very important because our decision-making is supposed to be consensus-based. For the decision to be truly consensus based the nominator really needs to inform those who would likely want to defend the article. Specifically dis-including those likely to disagree with the nomination can trigger dark thoughts when those who worked on the article was deleted, without their being able to weigh in, in its defence.

I see you said Mikayelan's consulate was in a town of only 7,000. I didn't know that. For all I know, if I had participated in a discussion over deleting the article, at the afd, or on the talk page, I may have been convinced it should have been deleted?

Please understand that no good faith contributor wants to continue to make good faith mistakes. Not informing other contributors that they seem to be making a good faith mistake makes it very likely that they will continue to waste their time, and waste the time of other contributors, by making the same kind of mistakes in future. This is another very strong reason why nominators should follow the advice in the deletion policy, and inform article creators when they nominate their articles for deletion. Good faith contributors deserve the opportunity to learn when other contributors think they made a mistake. And, if it turns out that those with the concern had a point, they deserve the opportunity to learn from their mistake.

In this particular case, IF you were correct and Arsen Mikayelyan really didn't merit a standalone article, that would not preclude covering the individual as part of another article. Mikayelyan had not only served as an Armenian diplomat, but he served as a member of the Nagorno-Karabakh legislature, for the Free Motherland party. So, even if he didn't merit a standalone article, I suggest the proper closure would have been redirect to Free Motherland.

I checked your contributions from November 2013, to see if you told someone else that you nominated the article for deletion. I saw that you nominated many articles for deletion, and you didn't seem to ever leave the courtesy heads-up policy recommends.

My request to you is that you consider starting to inform other contributors as recommended by the policy. Geo Swan (talk) 21:45, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quick fix

Can I ask you for a minor favor? This has a picture of Murafa and Mateevici's daughters. I am not using my regular computer, and it seems where I'm at there's a problem with even the most basic of image editors. If you have the time, could you perchance upload a version of it to commons, and link it in the Murafa article? Dahn (talk) 20:47, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also this (the one on the right-hand corner). A fascinating page, that one. Dahn (talk) 20:54, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue XCVI, March 2014

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content
Book reviews: Hawkeye7 on military command and Nick-D on F-111s in combat

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:21, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Altus mare

-- GreenC 15:09, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Novoselytsia Raion

Hey, thanks for making all those village articles on Novoselytsia Raion! I've been trying to tackle the list of urban-type settlements for the most part, but have yet to get around to any the village articles (doubt I ever will..). Anyways, I took the liberty of fixing some of the Ukrainian names to their correct transliteration, hope you won't mind. Cheers, § DDima 17:32, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The No Spam Barnstar

Hi Biruitorul,

I'm the founder of floreni.net and it's real e-shop here in Bulgaria, sorry for using the same name but it's the name choosen long time ago from the owner of the flowers shop. Since i see there is other very different items in Wikipedia under the same wiki-name I wrote just other meaning of that name. Sorry for the inconvinience.

have a nice day!

Hristo ivanov

H.ivanov77 (talk) 10:33, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Constitution of Hungary

I was in the middle of changing the links to the press releases of the European Institutions... Little patience please... --Ltbuni (talk) 14:42, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of people from Timișoara

Hi, I'm MrNiceGuy1113. Biruitorul, thanks for creating List of people from Timișoara!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi, a little elaboration of the text and references would help create readership credibility. Best regards, (MrNiceGuy1113 (talk) 14:46, 28 March 2014 (UTC))[reply]

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. MrNiceGuy1113 (talk) 14:46, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Sextil Pușcariu

On 4 April 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sextil Pușcariu, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Romanian linguist Sextil Pușcariu spent three years in Berlin during World War II, leading a propaganda effort against Hungary's hold on Northern Transylvania? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sextil Pușcariu. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Communes of Romania on ro.wp

I know you don't have much interest in ro.wp, but just FYI, I'm trying to revive your proposals from ro:Discuție Proiect:Comune-Sate#Bălăceanu.- Andrei (talk) 16:32, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review user edits

Salut. Ce se poate de făcut cu userul Tana96 care a început a schimonosi toate numele proprii din sudul Republicii Moldova traducându-le în limba găgăuză (inclusiv mută cu locul articole întregi)? Modificările care le-a făcut până în 10 aprilie (inclusiv) le-am anulat/corectat. Dar azi și ieri iarăși a revenit cu o serie de modificări aiurea; trebuie cumva de oprit. XXN (talk) 22:33, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue XCVII, April 2014

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content
Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at Britain's War Machine
Interview: Article writers discuss German military history

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:46, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	Dear Biruitorul, thank you for adding links to the newly created article about the Army of the Lord throughout Wikipedia. I really appreciate that! Have a great day, Anupam^Talk 00:12, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cold War

Hi Biruitorul, I saw you didn't agree with my edit on the Cold War. So I just want you to know that even though the Soviet Union did practice a form of democracy, It was limited compared to the US and saying that it was a rivalry between the capitalism and democracy doesn't add up since the US represented Capitalism and the Democracy in the Soviet Union was a far cry to be even regarded that it had a democracy. So I thought it would be better to Change Democracy to socialism in order to give the viewer a better notion of the Cold war, specially since its written in the introduction and the Cold war is globally known as a rivalry between the two world powers one (US) representing capitalism and democracy and the other (USSR) representing a socialist system and communism (Even if it had democratic contents). (N0n3up (talk) 00:41, 8 May 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Talk:Marie of Romania/GA1

This user helped promote Marie of Romania to good article status.

Marie of Romania, an article for which you are the main contributor, has been listed as a Good Article. Keep up the good work! SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 10:11, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Virgil Vătășianu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romanian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WHS

Regarding the fortified churches: I changed the infobox in Hildesheim Cathedral, mentioning the WHS data at the bottom, see if that would work for you also, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:26, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue XCVIII, May 2014

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content
Book reviews: Nick-D looks at The Lost Boys of Anzac
Op-ed: Peacemaker67 on Featured Articles involving Yugoslavia in World War II

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:37, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fortified

In the spirit of this "angelic" discussion, I suggest a start for an infobox for one of "your" seven churches, happy to see one of them pictured on the Main page soon. How do you like my latest DYK? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:56, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:10, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Biertan fortified church

On 25 May 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Biertan fortified church, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a World Heritage Site in Romania contains the fortified churches of Biertan (pictured), Câlnic, Prejmer, Saschiz, Valea Viilor, Viscri, and Dârjiu? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:17, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 13:13, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Câlnic Citadel

On 25 May 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Câlnic Citadel, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a World Heritage Site in Romania contains the fortified churches of Biertan (pictured), Câlnic, Prejmer, Saschiz, Valea Viilor, Viscri, and Dârjiu? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:17, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 13:13, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Dârjiu fortified church

On 25 May 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dârjiu fortified church, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a World Heritage Site in Romania contains the fortified churches of Biertan (pictured), Câlnic, Prejmer, Saschiz, Valea Viilor, Viscri, and Dârjiu? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:17, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 13:14, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Prejmer fortified church

On 25 May 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Prejmer fortified church, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a World Heritage Site in Romania contains the fortified churches of Biertan (pictured), Câlnic, Prejmer, Saschiz, Valea Viilor, Viscri, and Dârjiu? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:17, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 13:14, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Saschiz fortified church

On 25 May 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Saschiz fortified church, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a World Heritage Site in Romania contains the fortified churches of Biertan (pictured), Câlnic, Prejmer, Saschiz, Valea Viilor, Viscri, and Dârjiu? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:17, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 13:14, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Valea Viilor fortified church

On 25 May 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Valea Viilor fortified church, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a World Heritage Site in Romania contains the fortified churches of Biertan (pictured), Câlnic, Prejmer, Saschiz, Valea Viilor, Viscri, and Dârjiu? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:17, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 13:14, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Viscri fortified church

On 25 May 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Viscri fortified church, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a World Heritage Site in Romania contains the fortified churches of Biertan (pictured), Câlnic, Prejmer, Saschiz, Valea Viilor, Viscri, and Dârjiu? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:17, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 13:15, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fortified churches

Thank you for your work on the fortified churches that have been featured on the front page today. They've been a joy to read. Crispulop (talk) 17:25, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding attractive infoboxes! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:43, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They are featured now on Portal:Germany. Statistics are promising, only 285 hits off the limit of 5k, those should come today ;) - I was wrong, expecting that people would look only at the first one or two, - probably because those proved so interesting that they kept reading! - Next time: please choose a short simple name for the nomination, just to identify it, Biertan would have been enough ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:18, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

fortified churches
Thank you, editor seeking "to promote peace and harmony among Central and Eastern European Wikipedians". for quality articles on Romanian topics, such as the seven places of a World Heritage Site, for creating and maintaining categories, for having deserved the "Exceptional Newcomer Award for your excellent contribution towards Eastern European topics, including, but not limited to, a great number of useful small edits and corrections" already in 2006. - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (16 April 2009)!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:32, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

edits on dan nica

Hey there! My edit on grammatical errors might not be right, bu I believe your way of spelling is not the right way to go either! look at google, this shows the way the sentence "he was again" is used in phrases online. Its mostly used in biblical stuff or in a different sentence (as in: there he was again, a wandering soul). Maybe the text should be From May 2012 to February 2014 he returned to his former post as Communications Minister. Followed by His current job is blablablabla. to show recent events. What are your thoughts? Tomato 33 (talk) 22:08, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Elena Udrea may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:02, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mircea Gradu

Stimate Domnule Biruitorul. Nu mi-a fost clar de ce ati propus pentru stergere rapida articolul Mircea Gradu. Ati avut curiozitatea sa cautati Mircea Gradu pe Google? Poate gaseati informatii care sa fi intarit articolul. Evident mai arduous decat sa introduceti un {{db}} Google search. Stergerea s-a produs de catre un cetatean care foloseste Wikipedia drept for pentru promovarea propriei imagini User:RHaworth. Ceva nu e corect aici, nu credeti? Simiprof (talk) 13:04, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A ramas sa creati un articol pt. Radu Voinea. 24.175.228.172 (talk) 03:52, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tenor

I started copy-editing Vasile Moldoveanu, - can you help? - I think we don't need all the details ... --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:23, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Right-wing propagandist

I like how your profile highlights your conflict of interest. Look, I realize you are from Eastern Europe or whatever, but you can't go stalking users, reverting edits with the edit summary "heh" just because you don't like them. The fact that you are trying to keep sentences like "communist totalitarianism vs. capitalist democracy" is a joke. Moreover so that you stalk me and revert my edits in the Jobbik article - even though the version which I reverted back to was the version which achieved consensus in the talk page, and the version you reverted back to was the work of some unregistered vandal without an edit summary. So I guess you aren't ashamed of also sticking up for far-right parties in your propagandist endeavors. Zozs (talk) 21:55, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Galindo Mellado Cruz

Hi, your DYK review was incomplete. Please see template. Yoninah (talk) 16:27, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Terrific review! Please add the tick again and it's ready to go. Best, Yoninah (talk) 23:05, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cool but

That's much appreciated, but please pay attention to WP:COPYPASTE (first sentence seem like a clear copyvio...). Actually second one is as well. This kind of stuff can land you in trouble; I'd strongly suggest you rewrite this and spend some time fixing this problem in your past articles. Talk to me in priv id you want more info. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:24, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wookey Hole Caves

I have read with interest your update on this page. "The cave was first opened to the public by the owner Captain G.W. Hodgkinson in 1927 following preparatory work by Balch.[61] Three years later, John Cowper Powys wrote of them in the novel A Glastonbury Romance. Hodgkinson took offence at the portrayal of his fictional equivalent, initiating a costly libel suit.[63]"

Having looked at the Glastonbury Romance page, I can see no reference to the caves at Wookey Hole, and it would seem that the only connection is Captain Hodgkinson. I question, therefore the relevance of the update to this page. On a more minor note, your update indicates that Powys also wrote of Balch in his novel, but I can see no indication of that in the article. Langcliffe (talk) 09:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your reply: Oh, but surely we aren't going to rely on a mere Wikipedia article (and a fairly shabby one at that) to tell us what is or isn't relevant, right? Thank you for your reply. It wasn't the sort of patronising tone that I expected, but each to his own. Thank you for the amplification, and for the clearer wording in the article. Langcliffe (talk) 14:08, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Timișoara deputy mayors

Hello, thank you for your help on the Timișoara page. I wanted to ask if citation is needed when adding deputy mayors. I checked the Cluj-Napoca page, considered a "good article", and it didn't have any. If needed, the information is on the website of the city (in "Conducere"), which is already linked. What do you think?

YoursBadDay (talk) 09:10, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mircea Diaconu

On 17 June 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mircea Diaconu, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mircea Diaconu. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Allen3 ^talk 13:58, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ecaterina Andronescu

Hi, this is news for me that she does not take her seat. Is it known who will take over? Cassandro (talk) 15:20, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I missed that somehow. I corrected the list. Cassandro (talk) 17:26, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue XCIX, June 2014

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content
Book reviews: Nick-D looks at life aboard a US aircraft carrier and Hawkeye7 considers the role of food in World War II

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:28, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Grigore T. Popa

On 24 June 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Grigore T. Popa, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Romanian anatomist Grigore T. Popa's peasant parents sold their land to help finance his education? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Grigore T. Popa. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:32, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Francisc Rainer

On 29 June 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Francisc Rainer, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in 1944 Romanian pathologist Francisc Rainer (pictured) correctly diagnosed himself with lung cancer, predicted the time of his death, and left instructions for his own embalming? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Francisc Rainer. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 16:02, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Toldya. Dahn (talk) 16:13, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warning For Vandalism

You recently vandalized the article "Ferdinand I of Romania" by deleting a big block of text supported by multiple reliable sources. Please refrain yourself from trying to import here on the English version of the Wikipedia the very bad practices of perpetrating and condoning vandalism, which are unfortunately still so customary among some Romanian administrators and users on the Romanian language version. Remus Octavian Mocanu (talk) 05:58, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@ Biruitorul. Don't waste your time explaining... I've already shown him on ro.wiki how part of his sources are unreliable, the problem of giving undue weight to viewpoint he artificially constructs by misinterpreting sources or making strange inferences, the absurdity of implying Ferdinand was a dictator and so forth. He's got a problem with Carol I, Ferdinand and Mihai and he's trying everything to bash them, instead of sticking to scientific consensus.--Mihai (talk) 13:57, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

With still no reply from you to my last interpellation here (other than using anew the delete button in the article), i have no choice but to request the help of administrators so that the sourced text I introduced and you removed repeteadly and for no reson is protected: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Biruitorul_reported_by_User:Remus_Octavian_Mocanu_.28Result:_.29 Remus Octavian Mocanu (talk) 21:54, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

De ce domnule draga ati incercat sa stergeti o pagina Wikipedia facuta de curand cu numele meu...? Nu fac nici politica... Nici nu am facut rau niciodata cuiva... cu atat mai putin dumitale... Tot ce aparea in acea pagina de wikipedia era decent... Sa auzim si de mai bine... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silviu Alexandru Mihaila (talk • contribs) 13:36, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Să auzim de mai bine" after nominating his talk page for speeedy deletion? Good one :)) --Mihai (talk) 13:57, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sun

	Silviu - Iubi-te-voi Doamne (inregistrare)
	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yem2-ajnQ04 Sebastianandrei (talk) 07:07, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

.

B, you forget that most people have no idea how these things look like. You might have seen hundreds, but most Western Europeans haven't. And 4 pictures are not much. Hafspajen (talk) 21:27, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semantrons
this one is very good, showing the wooden walls.
this is different, hanging between trees
this shows how the building looks like, and roof

So, now I am ready. Which ones shall we use? I do think it is good to have a gallery on a subject that is not that well known. Hafspajen (talk) 22:00, 2 July 2014 (UTC) Hafspajen (talk) 22:00, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Alexandru Philippide

On 5 July 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alexandru Philippide, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Romanian linguist Alexandru Philippide championed science and disdained literature, especially poetry, yet his son became a poet? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alexandru Philippide. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:02, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Around?

Well, if you are, I have a surprise waiting for you (and your fresh pair of eyes). Dahn (talk) 16:10, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm getting worried... Dahn (talk) 14:38, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue C, July 2014

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content
Book reviews: Jonas Vinther and Nick-D look at examples of electronic media
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the shot heard around the world

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:47, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CI, August 2014

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content
Book reviews: Wrap-up of some recent external reviews
Interview: World War I editors
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the outbreak of World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:23, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adevărul, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page People's democracy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of George Oprescu

Hello! Your submission of George Oprescu at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 14:11, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nicolae Bălcescu Land Forces Academy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Land Forces Military Academy''' ({{lang-ro|Academia Forțelor Terestre "Nicolae Bălcescu”}})) is an institute of higher military education located in [[Sibiu]], [[Romania]].

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:24, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article Iablanița

I see you keep on deleting my section about tourist attractions and the native ethnicity and religion of Iablanița. You are also deleting my perfectly valid references. Please explain the reason why you are deleting my additions in detail.

Gug01 (talk) 17:33, 30 August 2014 (UTC)Gug01Gug01 (talk) 17:33, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for George Oprescu

On 2 September 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article George Oprescu, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that while working as a French teacher, the future Romanian art critic George Oprescu denounced the German occupation, prompting his arrest and deportation to an internment camp in Bulgaria? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/George Oprescu. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:03, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Razvan Stoica

Hi. You tagged this article for AfD but it appears that you failed to notify the author. Could you correct this please. Thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:36, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Cuibul

Hello Biruitorul. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Cuibul, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:28, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mișu Dulgheru

On 11 September 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mișu Dulgheru, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that after being purged, Romanian communist Mișu Dulgheru went from being a leading figure in the Securitate secret police to heading up Bucharest's waste collectors? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mișu Dulgheru. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:02, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy declined

Hello, this is about the speedy deletion tag you added here. This article was previously deleted as a CSD-A7, so isn't eligible for speedy deletion. If you still feel that the article should be deleted for other policy-based reasons, please initiate an AfD. Risker (talk) 05:07, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bogdana, Vaslui, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bogdăneşti. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Add Grup

I'm sorry, but I declined your G11 and A7 tags on this article because, in my opinion, the article credibly indicates enough significance to avoid A7 and doesn't sound promotional enough for G11. If you still feel the article needs deleted I recommend trying AfD. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 15:52, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CII, September 2014

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content
Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at the military history of Austria-Hungary
Timeleine: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:24, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Moldovans in Ukraine

The whole part with how they emigrated because of the Turks is not cited and likely the author's unverified opinion. We could try to push for its deletion but the fact of the matter is that 250,000 people declared themselves Moldovans and there will be resistance to that. I think the best way to approach this is the same as any other page on Moldovans. Present the fact that this 'ethnic identity' is contested. Best Dapiks (talk) 16:41, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Corneliu Stroe, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! --Mycomp (talk) 09:11, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Constantin Doncea

Hello! Your submission of Constantin Doncea at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:26, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's rather unfair of you to accuse me of abusive behavior when all I did was point out a grammatical issue. As I didn't put the page or the DYK template page on my watchlist, I had no idea that you had fixed the problem until you notified me on my talk page nine days later. The grammar certainly looks better now, and I'm happy to pass it. Yoninah (talk) 18:19, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Nicolae Colan

Hello! Your submission of Nicolae Colan at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Peter I. Vardy (talk) 17:43, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content
Book review: Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:32, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014, Redux

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content
Book reviews: Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars
Timeline: This month in World War I

NOTE: This replaces the earlier October 2014 Bugle message, which had incorrect links -- please ignore/delete the previous message. Thank uou!

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:52, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Please save Lia Olguța Vasilescu, Georgi Ovcharov, Mărinică Dincă, List of mayors of Craiova from deletion. A Hungarian user is asking gor their deletion cause I am a sock. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Osugiba (talk • contribs) 13:24, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Constantin Doncea

On 21 October 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Constantin Doncea, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Romanian communist Constantin Doncea made a well-publicized break from prison, finding his way to Moscow and then to the International Brigades during the Spanish Civil War? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Constantin Doncea. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:44, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bianca may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*[[Bianca Răzor] (born 1994), Romanian sprinter

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:23, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Moldovan (surname) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*[[Moldoveanu (surname)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:25, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Naomi Feinbrun-Dothan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[Babeș-Bolyai University|University of Cluj]], in the [[Romania]]n province of [[Transylvania]]). In 1923, she received her first degree in Botany. She then became a teacher at a Jewish girls

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:23, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Nicolae Colan

On 25 October 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nicolae Colan, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Nicolae Colan was the only Romanian Orthodox bishop who remained in Northern Transylvania after the region was ceded to Hungary in 1940? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nicolae Colan. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:02, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nikita (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nichita. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:35, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alexandra Mas

Draga Biruitorul,
I dont know if you speak romanian,soo I will write in english. First I want to apologize to you. I work very hard at this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandra_Mas. When I see that you are delete it and I was very angry.maybe I overreacted a little and I have introduced that discutions everywhere. Second,I want your sincerely response on thisquestion:do you think that I must continue to work on this article?I see some potential in this subject,but maybe I'm wrong.I'm a pasionate french art consumer and maybe I'm subjective.Can you believe that if I found some good references I can continue the work? Or to stop? I don't know wath to do.To continue to search or not.I will do what you will say. If you believe that I must to continue,please give me an advice of what I must to do.Give me some clue. Please,I want your honestly response at my talk page.

I sent to Alexandra Mas your observations,and in the first time she was angry,but after that she say: "Ok,maybe he has right".She was tell me that if you want,she will send you an invitation at her artshows in Paris.For visiting her artshow it is need by invitation from her. I dont want to interpret this in anyway mode.This is what she say.I just transmit this to you. Please believe me,I never meet this girl. How i discover?I searched some information about pictography on the net and I saw her art works on google search image.In I like this works very much.That's all.You can believe me you can not,but this is the true.i see some very big potential in the art of Alexandra.Again,i never see her,I dot know her.Was just an hazard that I discover her.I just sent her some mails for give to wikipedia the copyrights for the pictures form the articles,and I sent her your observation. Anyway,she was not very interested in this article .
Thank you very much,and again,apologize!I redtired all what I say. Leedskalnin (talk) 19:22, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CIV, November 2014

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content
Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Nazi Germany's Eastern Front allies
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the origins and legacy of trench warfare
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:27, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

National Democratic Hungarian-Szekler Party

Hi Biruitorul. I saw that you created the Magyar Party (Romania) article, and the original version includes a line about the National Democratic Hungarian-Szekler Party (which I just created) taking part in the 1920 elections. According to my election handbook, the party isn't mentioned in that election (although it could be in the "others" that won four seats in total. I was just wondering what your source was, and whether you could possibly clarify if they did take part and if they won any seats. If so, could you also update the article with any other info you can find? Cheers, Number 5 7 22:03, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The award that the Iordan Chimet book got (or didn't get)

Hi, I see that you continue to delete what a reliable source says about one of Iordan Chimet's books winning an award at the National Book Fair in Los Angeles in 1974. When you deleted it the first time, you yourself admitted that Romania literara, a leading Romanian literary weekly, is a reliable source. I reintroduced the information because according to Wikipedia rules, "Editors may not ... remove sources' views from articles simply because they disagree with them" and "editors are not making judgments as to what is true and what is false, but what can be verified in a reliable source". When you deleted it the second time you commented "Well, that's not good enough" when I referred to WP:VNT. According to which rules do you continue to delete that particular information? Have a nice day,--Mycomp (talk) 22:50, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Biruitorul. You have new messages at Mycomp's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ion Negoitescu

Hi, can you, please, tell me what your source is for Stefanita Regman being a "researcher"? I found that he is a high school teacher of Portuguese in Paris and co-author of two language learning textbooks. I am not sure if that qualifies to be called a "researcher." --Mycomp (talk) 06:10, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Romanians were nomads?

Hi. What do you think about the inclusion of the article Origin of the Romanians into Category:Nomadic_groups_in_Eurasia? If you are against, please submit a comment at Talk:Origin_of_the_Romanians 84.197.146.185 (talk) 06:45, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Szilágyi, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Péter Szilágyi and Zsolt Szilágyi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Adrian Năstase. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Diannaa (talk) 19:48, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined speedy

I've declined the speedy on Infected Rain. The big issue is that since they've performed at OST fest, that gives a slight assertion of notability. It's just enough to where it could possibly be contested, so I'm going to take it to AfD instead. I figure this way there will be an official consensus since the band slightly toes that vague assertion of notability line when it comes to speedy deletions. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:20, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alexandra Mas,ce am vrut sa fac de fapt

Draga [[Biruitorul
nu pot sa nu ma abtin sa te intreb daca ai patit ceva la cutremur (eu stau la etajul 7 si m-am speriat tare,ma uitam la primul tau speedy deletion la articol cand a inceput batzaiala).
Stiu ca am facut ceva cam stupid dar am avut ideea sa public articolul ca sa vad ce opinii mai au si alti useri (cateodata din idei stupide iese ceva bun, doar daca nu incerci nimic nu gresesti).Sper ca nu te-am enervat prea tare,stiu ca articolul este in momentul de fata pentru deletion (oricum l-ar fi sters altii),dar eu as vrea sa mai continui sa lucrez la el,o fac din instinct,cred ca in timp Alexandra se va apropia de gradul de notabilitate cerut de wikipedia (Am vorbit cu Francis Paren si a spus ca in tomul 4 de la Art Nude Today va lua mai multe lucrari ale artistei.Si mi-a confirmat banuiala ca Alexandra are un viitor mare in arta).De asemenea o jurnalista franceza mi-a spus ca in 2 luni va apare un amplu articol despre Alexandra intr-o revista de domeniu.
Da-mi si mie te rog doua lamuriri tehnice:
- cum fac sa pun un articol sub urmarire (vreau sa urmaresc si eu un articol al unui user ,banuiesc ca il pui undeva intr-un watchlist).
- cum fac sa pun un comentariu cand fac o modificare la un articol.Acolo sus sub numele userului, cum ai facut tu de exemplu aici<< Adrian Năstase ‎ (could you perhaps do once a week? or once a month? that would help.)>>. Sper ca nu te superi ca m-am uitat prin contributiile tale,jos palaria ce mai.
Apropos,chestia asta cu Nastase e cea mai tare faza care am vazut-o.Userul asta considera wikipedia un fel de rampa politica(adica hai sa vedem cum il mai lovim pe Nastase.
Si ultima chestie in caz ca o sa mai te intreb cate ceva(mai bine te intreb pe tine decat pe Cullen care de abia imi raspunde),daca ai mai mult de 40 de ani sau mai putin (nu vreau sa fiu ireverentios in cazul in care aveti o varsta mai mare ca a mea) si cam din ce zona a tarii esti (eu sunt prahovean stabilit la Tulcea),
Un sfat amical:nu mai lucra atat de tarziu in noapte,nu e bine pentru sanatate crede-ma (oare se merita?) Ok,multumesc!
Leedskalnin (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Nicolae Bălan

On 29 November 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nicolae Bălan, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Romanian Orthodox bishop Nicolae Bălan went from being an Iron Guard supporter to working with his country's new Communist regime in suppressing the Greek-Catholic Church? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nicolae Bălan. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:57, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

The Moldova issue was very well summarized by you somewhere in a strange sandbox that belongs in a newspaper.

Sb2s3 (talk) 23:16, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mantra (restaurant)

I de-prodded this. There is an assertion of notability, as well as reviews from several reliable sources, and a short discussion of its impact in the neighborhood's gentrification. Bearian (talk)

[1] ttp://www.voxnovus.com/composer/Liana_Alexandra.htm

[2] Kim Lane Scheppele, New York Times, March 1, 2013 http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/01/guest-post-constitutional-revenge/ Constitutional Revenge

[3] ttp://hungarianspectrum.wordpress.com/2013/03/19/kim-lane-scheppeles-testimony-at-the-helsinki-commission-hearing-on-hungary-full-text/

[4] ttp://hungarianspectrum.wordpress.com/2013/03/19/kim-lane-scheppeles-testimony-at-the-helsinki-commission-hearing-on-hungary-full-text/

[5] ttp://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2F%2FEP%2F%2FNONSGML%2BCOMPARL%2BPE-491.186%2B02%2BDOC%2BPDF%2BV0%2F%2FEN

[6] ttp://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/libe/dv/906/906320/906320en.pdf

[7] ttp://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2F%2FEP%2F%2FNONSGML%2BCOMPARL%2BPE-500.583%2B01%2BDOC%2BPDF%2BV0%2F%2FEN

[8] ttp://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2F%2FEP%2F%2FNONSGML%2BCOMPARL%2BPE-502.280%2B01%2BDOC%2BPDF%2BV0%2F%2FEN

[9] ttp://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/by_opinion.aspx?country=17

[10] ttp://lapa.princeton.edu/newsdetail.php?ID=63

[11] ttp://lapa.princeton.edu/peopledetail.php?ID=432

[12] ttp://wws.princeton.edu/people/display_person.xml?netid=kimlane&all=yes

[13] ttp://www.ceu.hu/video/2012-02-16/kim-lane-scheppele-on-hungarys-new-constitution-the-full-lecture-at-ceu

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]