User talk:BevChuang

August 2014

Hello, I'm Largoplazo. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Bevan Chuang without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:44, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, BevChuang. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Bevan Chuang, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:44, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Susanna Kruger

Can I ask why you are wikilinking Susanna Kruger when no such article exists, and the person appears to be a very long way off from meeting notability? Without notability, there won't be an article. And without an article, there's no point introducing wikilinks. I see you are a new editor and I appreciate that Wikipedia's rules are many and varied, but I'd be glad to receive a short reply (here's good) and won't just revert your edits. Schwede 66 04:52, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see you tried to write an article about her. Schwede 66 04:55, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your request at Files for upload

Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for upload! I've looked over your request and left a comment. Please check the comment and respond at your request on the main Files for Upload page (not here). Your request will stay there for seven days and then it will be archived. Regards, TLSuda (talk) 11:53, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your request at Files for upload

Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for upload! Unfortunately, your request has been declined. The reason is shown on the main FFU page. The request will be archived shortly; if you cannot find it on that page, it will probably be at this month's archive. Regards, TLSuda (talk) 03:10, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]