It looks like this currently only allows for 37 total, but the code appears to include up to 50. I doubt we really need more than say 25, so I propose we cut it down to just 25. This will reduce the complexity of the code as well. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 20:02, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Example
Highest-grossing film series
Rank
Series
Total worldwide box office
No. of films
Average of films
Highest-grossing film
1
Foo Series
4,000
40
100
Foobar 1 (100)
1
Part 1
100
2
Part 2
100
3
Part 3
100
4
Part 4
100
5
Part 5
100
6
Part 6
100
7
Part 7
100
8
Part 8
100
9
Part 9
100
10
Part 10
100
11
Part 11
100
12
Part 12
100
13
Part 13
100
14
Part 14
100
15
Part 15
100
16
Part 16
100
17
Part 17
100
18
Part 18
100
19
Part 19
100
20
Part 20
100
21
Part 21
100
22
Part 22
100
23
Part 23
100
24
Part 24
100
25
Part 25
100
26
Part 26
100
27
Part 27
100
28
Part 28
100
29
Part 29
100
30
Part 30
100
31
Part 31
100
32
Part 32
100
33
Part 33
100
34
Part 34
100
35
Part 35
100
36
Part 36
100
37
Part 37
100
38
Part 38
100
39
Part 39
100
40
Part 40
100
Yes, due to the nested expression depth limitation, the limit was effectively 37 films. I have gone ahead and cut the template down to a maximum of 30. I believe this is still far higher than the record number of films in a series, or at least in a highest-grossing film franchise. Another option would be to just unnest the list at the end. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 20:08, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]