User talk:Beersaur

Welcome!

Hello, Beersaur, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! —Snigbrook 13:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brook Green article

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Brook Green article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Help Desk". You can also leave a message on my talk page. —Snigbrook 13:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Warlock. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:15, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How is it unconstructive? Charlie Sheen is a Warlock. It's all through the media, it can be verified. How would you prove that he is not a warlock?

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Warlock, you may be blocked from editing. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:51, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

actually please stop your disruptive editing and please join the community and engage your grievance on the articles talk page like a grown up before continuing your reverting.Beersaur (talk) 05:24, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Warlock, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:25, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay - an editor (me) responded on the talk page. Would you like to follow your own advice and do the same? You are already past WP:3RR, and another revert would surely mean a trip to WP:3RRNB (which would mean a block, I would wager). Cheers :> Doc talk 05:43, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

woo scary. 3RR, I might get blocked. How tough are you.... haha lolz

Whatever... Doc talk 06:01, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE - I added your report to the WP:3RRNB. Even though you eventually stopped reverting, it took 3 vandalism warnings and a 3RR warning which you "lolz"ed. You committed six reverts on the same page in under 90 minutes: we don't do that on WP. Please don't revert like this in the future. Thanks. Doc talk 06:50, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Warlock. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sandstein 20:12, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Beersaur, you just very narrowly escaped a block for edit warring, and only because you did not continue edit-warring after the warning. If you do not make useful contributions henceforth, rather than the unwise and confrontative ones you have been making so far, I predict that your editing career will come to an abrupt end rather soon. Sandstein 20:14, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]