User talk:Banoffee Pies

Image tagging for Image:Elphinstone day.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Elphinstone day.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:06, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: CfR for Category:Tall Buildings in Glasgow

Hello, Banoffee Pies. Just to let you know, I have nominated Category:Tall Buildings in Glasgow, which it appears you created, for a renaming to Category:Buildings in Glasgow. I think the category would best serve the project by not including the qualification of height, something which is somewhat ambiguous to begin with. The category won't be renamed immediately - there is a discussion taking place here to decide if this will be worthwhile or not. Please help us decide by participating in the discussion - we would be more than happy to have your input as the creator. Thank you! Hersfold ^(talk/work) 21:25, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Gallow.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Gallow.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:06, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Bluevalestreet pic1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bluevalestreet pic1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:05, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Cumber1 lrg.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cumber1 lrg.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:06, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Antonine Centre

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Antonine Centre, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 17:35, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Areas of Cumbernauld

Template:Areas of Cumbernauld has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Mike Peel 21:59, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Antonine Centre for deletion

The article Antonine Centre is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonine Centre until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 02:39, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]