User talk:BT101

Welcome!

Hello, BT101, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Craig Henry Drive, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Beeblebrox (talk) 02:24, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Craig Henry Drive

The article Craig Henry Drive has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this is a notable road, no references. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:24, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:24, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tomken Rd

Hello, BT101. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Tomken Rd, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Sjrct (talk) 02:58, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 12 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Eastgate Parkway page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anjou Interchange for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anjou Interchange is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjou Interchange until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 11:38, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

While your dedication to creating articles on Canada's road system is praiseworthy, and Wikipedia could use your help, your article creation is a bit overzealous. On Wikipedia (WP), we need "significant coverage in reliable sources" to have an article about any subject.

This does not mean we could not have the same information in another format though; before writing any further, I suggest you go and talk with Wikipedia:WikiProject Highways and coordinate with them.

If you have more general questions about Wikipedia, you can ask at the help desk or at the teahouse, or to me here (but then, please notify me by including {{U|Tigraan}} in your comment, and signing it with four tildes: ~~~~ - this will send me a WP:PING).

(Je peux communiquer en français si besoin est.) Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 11:47, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eastgate Parkway

The article Eastgate Parkway has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this subject meets WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 23:24, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Quebec Route Renumbering

Hello, BT101. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Quebec Route Renumbering, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Abbottonian (talk) 13:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Campeau Dr for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Campeau Dr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campeau Dr until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kleuske (talk) 13:55, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kanata Ave

The article Kanata Ave has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, run-of-the-mill road

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 13:59, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Castlefrank Road (Ottawa)

The article Castlefrank Road (Ottawa) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of any notabiity,for this road

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 14:01, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eastgate Parkway for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eastgate Parkway is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eastgate Parkway until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Imzadi 1979 → 17:41, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John Young Elementary School

The article John Young Elementary School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, and elementary schools are not presumed to be notable otherwise

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 23:26, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fallowfield Road

The article Fallowfield Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails to meet WP:GNG; run of the mill road

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 23:35, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stittsville Main Street (Ottawa)

The article Stittsville Main Street (Ottawa) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject fails to meet the general notability guideline

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Rrburke (talk) 14:43, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Richardson Side Road for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richardson Side Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richardson Side Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Domdeparis (talk) 15:44, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stittsville Main Street (Ottawa) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stittsville Main Street (Ottawa) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stittsville Main Street (Ottawa) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Domdeparis (talk) 15:45, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bayshore Drive (Ottawa) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bayshore Drive (Ottawa) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bayshore Drive (Ottawa) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Domdeparis (talk) 15:47, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Perley Bridge

years ago - when?Xx236 (talk) 08:21, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have written a page about a demolition. Still very liitle about the construction.Xx236 (talk) 12:26, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Which Montreal River?

Xx236 (talk) 12:24, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Minto Recreation Complex for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Minto Recreation Complex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minto Recreation Complex until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 23:25, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Montreal River Hill for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Montreal River Hill is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montreal River Hill until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 23:30, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Perley Bridge for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Perley Bridge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perley Bridge until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 23:49, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this

Hello,

I already left you a note, above, but you might have missed it. Could you stop this mass-creation of articles and discuss it? We will not "get mad or anything", but if you continue creating articles in the knowledge they will be deleted, it wastes everyone's time and you will end up blocked. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 17:24, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What you need to understand is that Wikipedia is not a place where every road, every hill, every community centre, every bridge that exists (or used to exist) is automatically eligible to have an article just because it is or was a real thing. For an article to be justified, it has to be supported by real coverage in real media (not press releases or Google Maps) that clarify why the topic is important enough for the world to need an encyclopedia article about it. We have specific standards of notability, and specific standards of reliable sourcing, that have to be met before an article becomes earned — you can't just go around trying to create an article about every single thing that merely exists. Bearcat (talk) 19:34, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Greenbank Road (Ottawa)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Greenbank Road (Ottawa), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I'm been doing} 15:17, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Catherine Street (Ottawa)

The article Catherine Street (Ottawa) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable roadway

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 15:45, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Formal ANI notice: you absolutely need to answer to this

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 16:21, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above is a formal requirement, do not be fooled by its innocuous look. If you do not answer to this, you will be forbidden from editing. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 16:23, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of One week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Miniapolis 23:19, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically, you've been blocked for failing to address the concerns (mass creation of articles not meeting WP's notability guidelines) on this page. Miniapolis 23:22, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Split (Ottawa)

The article The Split (Ottawa) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails to establish notability per WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 22:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jeanne d'Arc Boulevard (Ottawa), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queensway. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pinecrest Road (Ottawa)

The article Pinecrest Road (Ottawa) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 06:29, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 23:54, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss your article creation... Wikipedia has some "rules" about what you can write in it. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 23:52, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Souligny Avenue

The article Souligny Avenue has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —JJ Be rs 02:17, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of March Road (Ottawa)

The article March Road (Ottawa) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —JJ Be rs 02:17, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of N216 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article N216 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N216 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:17, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See A303 road for example of a good article; in particular note that the majority of the article talks about things other than simply where it goes. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:20, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jeanne d'Arc Boulevard (Ottawa) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeanne d'Arc Boulevard (Ottawa) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeanne d'Arc Boulevard (Ottawa) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 12:48, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Roads

Please note that Wikipedia does not automatically accept all, or even most, roads as notable just because they exist. To be notable enough for a Wikipedia article, a road requires substantial historical, political or social context for what might make it important for the world to know about, and reliable source coverage about the road to support that — a road is not going to be accepted as notable if all you can do is describe its physical route, and the only source you can provide is its location on Google Maps. For example, Ottawa's Sussex Drive qualifies for an article as it's part of the government's formal ceremony route and has some of Canada's most important governmental institutions located on it — its eligibility for an article is because it has stronger claims to notability than the mere fact that it exists. And this has been explained to you before, so you're going to be running the very real risk of a longer editblock if you continue to disregard it by creating articles about arterial roads with no substantive claim of notability besides just existing. Bearcat (talk) 17:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]