User talk:Azores

Miss Sweden

I will assume, then, you were the anonymous IP 212.116.72.47, then. It was considered vandalism, as it had happened before from an anonymous IP address AND that the information was removed without discussion and without reason. You say that it was useless information, yet after the information had been re-added after your removal, you did not go to the talk page to discuss why it should be deleted, or even leave an edit summary. If you believe it should be removed, please add a section to the talk page concerning this information. ~QuasiAbstract (talk/contrib) 00:02, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The articles on Wikipedia are not owned by anyone, even the editors who created them. Whether you created the article or not, major changes should be discussed before implementing them. Please read the five pillars of Wikipedia to better understand what Wikipedia is all about. ~QuasiAbstract (talk/contrib) 18:54, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of cities in the Nordic countries

In the article List of cities in the Nordic countries, you cite the population of Helsinki as the entire population of the Finnish capital region, consisting of Helsinki, Espoo, Vantaa, and Kauniainen, totalling in over a million. The city of Helsinki itself only has a population of a bit over half that. You then proceed to cite Espoo and Vantaa separately. By doing this, you count every Espooan and Vantaa'an as two people. This data is so wrong it has to be corrected or deleted. JIP | Talk 20:01, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Bror Jacques de Wærn

A tag has been placed on Bror Jacques de Wærn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ravenswing 07:09, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Azores! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 6 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 161 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Liza Berggren - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Martin Timell - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jessica Olérs - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Malou Hansson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Anneli Alhanko - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Petra Hultgren - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:11, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Annika Duckmark

The article Annika Duckmark has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG - the winner of a national beauty pageant (see WP:1EVENT) however no other significant achievements. Failed to place at international level.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 06:24, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Annika Duckmark for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Annika Duckmark is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annika Duckmark until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 10:23, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cathrin Skoog

The article Cathrin Skoog has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a contestant in a Beauty Pageant doesn’t make her automatically notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 00:16, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]