User talk:Awnhi
==Latest revision as of 08:53, 27 June 2014==c I think that you could have ADDED TO the standing article the information instead of using it to REPLACE what had existed.
As such, I think that your edit should be reverted because it "vandalized" previously documented content and converted/converts the article into something more like a 'puff piece' and less like an encyclopedia article.
Indeed, one can argue that anyone can present herself as she wants to present herself (as 'Dr. Ann'), but that clouds the figure's past history in the 'lifetime mythos' in which she lived until she tripped over the frayed cord in Beacon Hill and triggered a fire which burned down her residence, which fire resulted in her death (and the world's loss of 'Dr. Ann').
But who had 'Dr. Ann' been. That biographical research on her natural personage should not be disrespected.MaynardClark (talk) 13:06, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Here's my suggestion, but you've been obstinate about this.
My suggestion is that you ADD what you had and NOT remove the earlier research. You are challenging the research as false, which claim you need to document. Surely 'Dr. Ann' was not BORN as 'Dr. Ann'!
Make your work compatible with prior work; add it, document it, but don't vandalize the existing article. MaynardClark (talk) 13:17, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
June 2014
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Wheatgrass has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Wheatgrass was changed by Awnhi (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.894427 on 2014-06-27T15:25:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:25, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest
[edit]
Hello, Awnhi. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Ann Wigmore, you may have a conflict of interest.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 17:54, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
- Why can't I edit Wikipedia?
Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.
- Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?
Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.
- What can I do now?
If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.
If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:
- Add the text
{{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}}on your user talk page. - Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
- Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
- Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
- Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.