User talk:Aucir

blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 01:41, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aucir (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

why Aucir (talk) 01:30, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Because of edits like this one. Max Semenik (talk) 02:15, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Aucir (talk) 01:30, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note to reviewing admin - I blocked this user after noting over 50 contributions consisting of random, uncommented, unsourced changes to data in articles. I imagine there's an explanation. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 01:40, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpgordon: Looking at the most recent edit before the unblock request made by this user, I see this edit, which seems like pure nonsense. I sense WP:IDHT. --JustBerry (talk) 02:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:MaxSem: Possible sock is User:Axsem considering this. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:04, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Anna. Max Semenik (talk) 04:16, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious socks

[1]

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:50, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unblock req

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aucir (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

im blocked more than years can you please help me Aucir (talk) 15:16, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 15:18, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock req

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aucir (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please help im block from 1year ago Aucir (talk) 15:21, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please read the guide to appealing blocks (which is linked in the block message) and then make a request which explains what you were doing wrong and why, in a way that convinces us that you genuinely do understand and will change your ways, and which also explains what you will do if unblocked. Remember that decisions made by those who review unblock requests are based on their judgment of whether it is to Wikipedia's benefit to have you back editing here, and I've seen nothing so far that convinces me that is the case. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:48, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Aucir (talk) 15:21, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are not permitted to blank declines for existing blocks. Do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 15:27, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aucir (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1-Maybe some of my post are mistake 2-i will better on wiki from now 3-i edit some post if i have info about it thanksAucir (talk) 19:55, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It seems clear that for whatever reason, you lack the needed skills to be able to edit. Once you take some time(at least 6 months) to improve your skills, you can request unblock using WP:UTRS. 331dot (talk) 20:22, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You've wasted our time with four unblock requests. I have revoked your talk page access to prevent you from wasting any more of our time. --Yamla (talk) 20:04, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]