User talk:Assaf050

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because it has, or may have, been compromised.
Please refer to contributions for evidence. If you are the legitimate owner of the account, you should contact ca

wikimedia.org for assistance.
(see: block log • contributions • page moves)

Welcome!

Hello, Assaf050, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —Ynhockey ^(Talk) 09:44, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tel Aviv - New York City sistercities?

Hi Assaf050, you added at the New York City article Tel Aviv as sister city (and vice versa). Can you tell where you get this information from? --Pilettes (talk) 00:44, 22 May 2011 (UTC) Here :) http://www.tel-aviv.gov.il/Cityhall/Pages/Partnerships.aspx[reply]

Ok, i have seen it. But it seems they are no twin cities, only global partners (whatever that means). I wrote it at the NYC discussion page, please feel free to talk there what you think about this. And two tips: try to make a ":" at the beginning of your post and see what happens. And it is very welcome if you sign your posts. Just look out for the symbol with the signature and the pencil above the edit box. --Pilettes (talk) 12:58, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Assaf050. If you want to add Tel Aviv to the "Sister Cities" section of the New York City article, will you please join the discussion here, explaining why you think it is correct, rather that just putting it back in? Best wishes, AndyJones (talk) 19:38, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Direct flights

Please read the WP:AIRPORTS page content, for direct flights that don't require a change of plane, we don't use "via" (since Jat Airways flight does Tel Aviv-Larnaca-Belgrade). For destinations of Jat Airways, just list as below:

Airlines	Destinations
Jat Airways	Belgrade, Larnaca

Full quote fom Wikipedia:AIRPORT-CONTENT#body:

7.List non-stop and direct flights only. That means the flight number and the aircraft, starts at this airport and continues to one or more airports. Avoid using the description 'via' since that is more correctly listed as another destination. If passengers can not disembark at a stop on a direct flight, then do not list it as a destination or as 'via'. Direct flights are not always non-stop flights. However, avoid listing direct flights that contain a stop at a domestic hub, as virtually all of these are simply flights from one "spoke city" to a hub, with the plane continuing from the hub to a second spoke city. Furthermore, these flights often involve plane changes, despite the direct designation. Including these flights dramatically increases the length of destination listings, artificially inflates the airline's presence at a location and requires constant updating, as these "timetable direct" destinations have little rhyme or reason and may change as often as every week or two.

I have bolded the "via" designation for emphasis on why i and other editors continue to revert your edits.

Snoozlepet (talk) 22:44, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Your recent edit to the page Logan International Airport appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. HkCaGu (talk) 16:54, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:06, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

your editing privledges

Just to be clear, you are free to edit this page, it's your page. But it's also the only page you may edit and your editing privileges have been removed. Removing the notice informing you of this wont change that.--RadioFan (talk) 20:16, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

-Hi, I think someone entered to my user today...because i was not on the computer today until now...--Assaf050 (talk) 20:23, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to be unblocked, you must appeal it first. Removing the block notice will not unblock you. However, it is best to leave the block notice so that other editors can tell whether a person is block or not. Snoozlepet (talk) 20:32, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But i'm telling you tht i wasn't delete the blocking message!!!. Whatever, I changed my password...--Assaf050 (talk) 23:48, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I buy that. You've removed the notice twice. Honesty will help you in appealing a block, a "my dog ate my homework" approach will not.--RadioFan (talk) 01:08, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How long the blockage will remain?--Assaf050 (talk) 12:53, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The block is indefinite as per the block template message you have received. You can appeal this block by following the instruction on the block template. Snoozlepet (talk) 21:37, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really sorry about everything ...I think that the ban it's too long. I see a lot of mistakes and just no one listened to me (I felt that) until now I see mistakes (Air Canada and other companies that not operate seasonal flights) and the fact it's infuriating. Who can I talk with him about the ban?--Assaf050 (talk) 22:25, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock-auto|...}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Assaf050 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, i am really really sorry about the case and the mess that i did. I behaved childishly and could prevent the vandalism of Karparthos in other ways. Please cancel my block, I've learned my lesson. I also would love to thst someone explain to me what to do if someone tries to open the an edit wars against me as happened last time with Karparthos.Assaf050 (talk) 12:52, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were blocked for using sock puppets, not edit warring or vandalism. Alexandria (talk) 14:31, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Assaf050 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, First I want to really apologize to you I made a mess and I had to listen to you if you open the Edit wars against me, it's really important for me to say. Now the point, I behaved childishly about that opening that I use. I felt that no one wants Lhtkshib me and I felt a sense of frustration. I really do not do it again, I promise you.

Decline reason:

Someone using this account tells us that this account has been repeatedly used by someone else without their knowledge. Wikipedia practice is to block such compromised accounts and keep them blocked. Someone using this account says they have changed the password, but we have no way of knowing whether that is the original user or someone else, and we also have no way of knowing whether that claim is true or not. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:25, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I really do not understand what do you want from me. I do everything ... I apologized and everything. Although I am not wiped out the warning but if I will tell it's me you pull out the blockage?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Assaf050 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I really do not understand what do you want from me. I do everything ... I apologized and everything. Although I am not wiped out the warning but if I will tell it's me you pull out the blockage?

Decline reason:

Everything I would say to a user in this situation, JamesBWatson said just as well. We do not unblock admittedly compromised accounts. EVER.. This is just basic network security. I do not know how much clearer this can be made to you. And, actually, that problem will shortly become academic as I am cutting off your access to this page so you won't waste any more of our time. If you really think you have something to edit, start a new account. — Daniel Case (talk) 19:11, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That's unusual. It's nearly always a brother, as indicated at WP:BROTHER, though I have known it to be a son, a cousin, or a friend. I don't off hand remember a sister before. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:44, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

its really offends me that you sneer at me. I have a younger sister and she got me for user to drive me crazy, that's all. I do not understand why you're laughing at me. I'm really angry and despairing :( --Assaf050 (talk) 17:48, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not lying and it really offends me that you have written about me. I really do not know what to do, but you just humiliate me and that's really insulting I still do not understand why you blocked my IP .--Assaf050 (talk) 17:52, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I honestly didn't intend to offend you, so I'm sorry if I did. However, if you are really offended by comments like that then you are probably better off staying away from editing Wikipedia. I have frequently received much worse than that. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:36, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]