Jump to content

User talk:Stuartlittlewrites

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:ArceeDigital)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Noor Mahal Hotel Karnal (June 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Amkgp was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
~ Amkgp 💬 07:43, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, ArceeDigital! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~ Amkgp 💬 07:43, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Noor Mahal Hotel Karnal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~ Amkgp 💬 07:43, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

[edit]

 Draft:Noor Mahal Hotel Karnal has been deleted
Hello, ArceeDigital. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but  Draft:Noor Mahal Hotel Karnal has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD#G11. "This applies to pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION." These must be rewritten from scratch from "reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject." See WP:RS.

Wikipedia:Identifying blatant advertising#Typical signs of blatant advertising contains information about content to avoid. For more information on content that may be perceived as promotional, click User:Deepfriedokra/promo. These are just rough guides. Pages can avoid all those pitfalls and still be glaringly obvious ad copy. Sometimes pages meeting WP:CSD#G11 give the appearance of an editor violating Wikipedia:Conflict of interest or WP:PAID. Please read and heed them if they apply to you. Please read Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations.

There is a very common mistake of assuming that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to promotion for commercial gain, but that is not so. Sometimes creators of promotional content are bewildered that it is considered such. If one has been trained to write or spent some time writing corporate documents or mission/vision statements or anything similar, they may simply be blind to the promotionality. It can be hard to unlearn.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources . Template:cite has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{references}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there.

The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. --Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 07:53, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. --Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 07:55, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dr-Taher renamed ArceeDigital to Stuartlittlewrites

[edit]
Dr-Taher renamed ArceeDigital to Stuartlittlewrites  --Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 13:56, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am blocked

[edit]

I was told my user name earlier was like a company name due to which it was looking like a advertising and promotional work. However, since i am a researcher by profession and i keep writing various articles i wanted to pursue my skills on wikipedia by contributing content here as well of relevant titles as per wikipedia guidelines. I immediately changed my name on wikipedia following guidelines where i received email : ‪Deepfriedokra‬ left a message on your talk page in "‪Dr-Taher renamed ArceeDigital to Stuartlittlewrites‬". Dr-Taher renamed ArceeDigital to Stuartlittlewrites Hence, i request to unblock my account so i can continue contributing and editing. Regards

Help me!

[edit]

Please help me with... I was told my user name earlier was like a company name due to which it was looking like a advertising and promotional work. However, since i am a researcher by profession and i keep writing various articles i wanted to pursue my skills on wikipedia by contributing content here as well of relevant titles as per wikipedia guidelines. I immediately changed my name on wikipedia following guidelines where i received email : ‪Deepfriedokra‬ left a message on your talk page in "‪Dr-Taher renamed ArceeDigital to Stuartlittlewrites‬". Dr-Taher renamed ArceeDigital to Stuartlittlewrites Hence, i request to unblock my account so i can continue contributing and editing. Regards Stuartlittlewrites (talk) 09:03, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To request unblock, please follow the instructions in the block notice. 331dot (talk) 09:05, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me 331dot

[edit]

Sir, i didn't understood the instruction as you said. I dont know what is block notice. Please help.

Help me unblock

[edit]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Stuartlittlewrites (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

I was told my user name earlier was like a company name due to which it was looking like a advertising and promotional work. However, since i am a researcher by profession and i keep writing various articles i wanted to pursue my skills on wikipedia by contributing content here as well of relevant titles as per wikipedia guidelines. I immediately changed my name on wikipedia following guidelines where i received email : ‪Deepfriedokra‬ left a message on your talk page in "‪Dr-Taher renamed ArceeDigital to Stuartlittlewrites‬". Dr-Taher renamed ArceeDigital to Stuartlittlewrites Hence, i request to unblock my account so i can continue contributing and editing. Regards

Decline reason:

Arcee Digital markets themselves as "Social media, Digital marketing, SEO, Website, Google Ads, Content, Article[...]" That would be a violation of our terms of use, as well as WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO. While I can't say for sure that an account that used to be named ArceeDigital is the same Arcee Digital I found elsewhere, I can say that your contributions were completely inappropriate, obvious violations of WP:PROMO and likely violations of WP:COI and WP:PAID. We aren't interested in that and you haven't addressed this in your unblock request. Yamla (talk) 10:47, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stuartlittlewrites (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Sir, i am a new contributor to WIkipedia. I somehow was not able to follow the guidelines of wikipedia which lead to its blocking. I apoogise for the mistaken Request if you can unblock me back again.

Decline reason:

Please read the message Yamla left for you in the previous declined unblock request and address those concerns. That is the only way that you can be unblocked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:12, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.