User talk:Utoppiaa575

December 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Nick-D (talk) 22:27, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your article 周健

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page 周健 to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 04:02, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to 周健 has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. --Poem (talk) 12:44, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Hello, I'm Sheldybett. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Boris Johnson, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. He has not yet have a sworn in date. Sheldybett (talk) 11:27, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. You have been regularly asked to add WP:RS - please do that JarrahTree 09:52, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Churchill image

Hello. You will need to establish a consensus among interested editors if you wish to change the image in the infobox. Please go to Talk:Winston Churchill#Infobox image and join the discussion I have initiated. After I opened this, however, I noticed that it is the second time in a few weeks that you have made this particular change. Your first attempt was also reverted for lack of consensus. You need to be aware of the importance on this site of WP:CONSENSUS when high-profile or fundamental changes are proposed. You would be quite in order, per WP:BOLD, to place your preferred image somewhere in the article's narrative section, even by replacing one of the images already there, but the infobox image is high profile and you must have consensus to change that. Thanks. No Great Shaker (talk) 09:25, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Apollovvv! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! User:HiLo48 (talk) 02:46, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HiLo48 (talk) 02:39, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Apollovvv, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!

HiLo48 (talk) 02:39, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello, I'm ItsCheck. An edit that you recently made to Empress Dowager Cixi seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ItsCheck (talk) 21:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shi Jianru moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Shi Jianru. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 16:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Shi Jianru. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shi Jianru

Hello, Utoppiaa575. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shi Jianru, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:11, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at 2024 Zhuhai car attack, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:35, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:AVOIDBOLD

您好，关于2024 Zhuhai car attack，我觉得首段不需要凑标题出来。去年广州天河的英维条目也是直接讲发生了什么，没有说2023广州车辆袭击是云云。祝编安。

General meaning in English: Like 2023 Guangzhou car attack, I don't think we should mention the title in the lead section.

— 魔琴 (Zauber Violino) [ talk contribs ] 08:51, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

你好，重复标题是维基常见的通用格式，表示客观性以及凸显词条的完整，建议还是存留。

Best,

Utoppiaa575 Utoppiaa575 (talk) 08:59, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

重复标题是MOS:BOLDLEAD的规定：If an article's title is a formal or widely accepted name for the subject, display it in bold as early as possible in the first sentence。瞄一眼References就能看出，很明显"2024 Zhuhai car attack"并非“正式或广泛接受的名称”。MOS:AVOIDBOLD说并非所有情况下都要重复标题，其例子“2011 Mississippi River floods”也与本次事故的标题十分相似，应该参照处理。您给出的理据并不能支撑。

General meaning in English: It does not follow MOS:BOLDLEAD and MOS:AVOIDBOLD.

— 魔琴 (Zauber Violino) [ talk contribs ] 09:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

为什么一定要用特殊情况否定一般情况？

Regards, Utoppiaa575 (talk) 09:24, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

虽然维基百科的编辑结果繁杂多样，但如果能做到的话，为什么不能让词条的客观和正式性强一些？

Regards, Utoppiaa575 (talk) 09:27, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

我并没有“用特殊情况否定一般情况”，2024 Zhuhai car attack就是指引所规定的不应该BOLDLEAD的情况。（见Wikipedia:Superfluous bolding explained#Superfluous bolding）。如果您觉得这种规定就是不合适地“用特殊情况否定一般情况”，我觉得应该去提案废除MOS:AVOIDBOLD和相关条文，而不是在这里扯“客观和正式”。MOS:BOLDLEAD也没说加粗是为了“客观和正式”。您这样勉强将条目主题塞进去，反倒是不符合指引规定，我看更像会损害条目的正式。

General meaning in English: I didn't negatate the general case. This case is defined in the guideline. MOS:BOLDLEAD didn't say anything about "neutrality and formality," which your edits may have been detrimental to.

— 魔琴 (Zauber Violino) [ talk contribs ] 10:26, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]