User talk:AngelCxNT

A tag has been placed on AngelCxNT, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

Please be aware that we strongly discourage people from writing about themselves and their projects - see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest for more details. FreplySpang 21:59, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If I may make a comment too, Wikipedia has clearly-defined guidelines on what constitutes a business/company notable enough to warrant an article (often referred to by the shorthand WP:CORP). No completed productions were mentioned in the article, only future ones (see "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball"). The "Google test", while not a definitive indicator of notability, produces not a single result for the studio name. With the large number of animation discussion forums, magazines and websites on the internet, it's not unreasonable to expect the name to show up a number of times. An animation studio, even one that releases content on the internet rather than the traditional TV/video/cinema route, should be documented by third parties in multiple reliable sources, in accordance with Wikipedia's verifiability requirements. I wish you all the luck in the world with your animation projects, but it's too early for a Wikipedia article just yet. ~Matticus ^T_C 22:21, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Matticus has explained the situation well (thanks!). The deletion of your article does not necessarily imply that your project is "some mere schoolboy folly," but only that you haven't (yet) achieved a certain level of recognition from other sources. Wikipedia is not a place to promote new projects. FreplySpang 22:34, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]