User talk:Andrzejbanas/Archive 8

Disambiguation link notification for December 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited City of the Living Dead, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anchor Bay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:33, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-edit

Hello, Andrzejbanas. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Planet Rock (song) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Puddleglum ^2.0 17:47, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving

Hi! I noticed you archived your talk page, but it was also done manually. It's all cool if you want to manually do that, but there are also multiple bots that are easy to set up that will automatically archive your talk page. If you want to set those up, I can help you or just set it up myself. The bots are ClueBot III and Lowercase sigambot III. Set up instructions can be found on those pages. Just a thought! Thanks, Puddleglum ^2.0 17:52, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Four of the Apocalypse.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Four of the Apocalypse.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers

Damon Runyon's short story "Dancing Dan's Christmas" is a fun read if you have the time. Right from the start it extols the virtues of the hot Tom and Jerry

This hot Tom and Jerry is an old-time drink that is once used by one and all in this country to celebrate Christmas with, and in fact it is once so popular that many people think Christmas is invented only to furnish an excuse for hot Tom and Jerry, although of course this is by no means true.

No matter what concoction is your favorite to imbibe during this festive season I would like to toast you with it and to thank you for all your work here at the 'pedia this past year. Best wishes for your 2020 as well A. MarnetteD|Talk 19:33, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Horror Newsletter - December 2019

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:03, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Four Times That Night, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antonio Rinaldi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:35, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Planet Rock (song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Planet Rock (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 22:01, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese films' database

I don't have sufficient knowledge about Chinese films or websites. Is there any place where I can find out the names of the the producers, production companies and distributors of the film Sheep Without a Shepherd, so that I can add it in the infobox. 137.97.37.58 (talk) 10:00, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Last Hunter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tony King (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:23, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Miyamoto-musashi-japanese-movie-poster-md.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Miyamoto-musashi-japanese-movie-poster-md.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited House of Horror (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Ford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

House by the Cemetery poster

Hey @Andrzejbanas: I was wondering about the House by the Cemetery artwork you reverted, and why it has the empty purple-bordered box above the key art—I have seen these on several poster uploads, mainly for Italian horror films, and don't understand what they are—moreover, I'm wondering if it's necessary to use these version of the poster(s) if there are alternate versions that don't have it. The empty box adds nothing of value and if nothing else, it extends the length of the infobox for no real purpose. Cinematerial has an alternate Italian-language poster for House by the Cemetery that contains the same artwork as the aforementioned one, but without the needless blank box above it. --Drown Soda (talk) 06:31, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey hey @Drown Soda:, I'm a bit more focused on using posters which I know aren't cropped. I believe if we are saying something is the poster for a film, we shouldn't use a cropped version if possible. Looking at some stuff on cinematerial, it is pulling information from people just googling posters online. Based on sites that specifically sell posters (i.e: [http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/search/house%2520by%2520the%2520cemetery/tag/nation%253AItaly/archive.html emovieposter.com for The House by the Cemetery), it shows them uncropped. I don't suggesting using these watermarked images, but it gives a good idea of what is a cropped poster and which is not. So I'm not too set on the big square, but I don't think we should be using cropped imagery either. If you have cleanner scans of a poster you think looks better with less white space, I'd suggest using it. Otherwise, The poster size is no big issue for me personally. Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:12, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Planet Rock (song)

The article Planet Rock (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Planet Rock (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 19:01, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Supercop2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Supercop2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:17, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Rock Box (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Sugar Hill and It's Like That

Looking for the Perfect Beat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Arthur Baker

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:13, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Openingnightposter.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Openingnightposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Madadayo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Rainbow Bridge

Take All of Me (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Richard Johnson

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:11, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tabufilmposter.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tabufilmposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 03:01, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Walls (Louis Tomlinson album)

Can you keep an eye of the page? Make sure its genres are based on sources that explicitly says. 2402:1980:82A6:ADFC:2F7F:F36E:9274:BD6C (talk) 06:39, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Madadayo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rainbow Bridge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:My man godfrey.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:My man godfrey.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 23:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kung Fu

Dear Andrzejbanas! Can you make an article about movie Kung Fu on Bosphorus 1974 (also titled Ninja Killer, in this movie played Bolo Yeung), co-production with Turkey and upload Hong Kong poster? Thank you! --95.54.103.156 (talk) 17:21, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cursemummystomb.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cursemummystomb.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Evilofrankenstein.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Evilofrankenstein.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Crescendo (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chris Barnes

Nightmare (1964 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Wilcox

The Gorgon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Michael Reed

The Legend of the 7 Golden Vampires (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Forbes-Robertson

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:17, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The-Legend-of-the-Seven-Golden-Vampires-poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The-Legend-of-the-Seven-Golden-Vampires-poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:26, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your Two Cents

Hey there, it's been a while. If I remembered correctly, I think you were opposed to using Toho Kingdom as a source for some kaiju-related articles. A topic was been brought up in the Godzilla franchise talk page to bring up a consensus to whether or not to use the site as a source. I think your two cents would be beneficial to the dialogue established. Armegon (talk) 10:26, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey hey @Armegon:, I will definitely chime in. Thanks for the heads up. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:31, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 29

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Crescendo (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chris Barnes

Sound of Horror (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Arturo Fernández

The Gorgon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Michael Reed

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Turkeyshootposter.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Turkeyshootposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sound of Horror, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arturo Fernández (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:47, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Robot in the Family newspaper citation

Hey there! I noticed that, in the article Robot in the Family, you added a Release section with a reference to a March 1994 issue of the newspaper The Brattleboro Reformer. I can't find any references to the cited article online, not even on Newspapers.com. Could you provide some way to verify this source please? —Matthew - (talk) 21:20, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey hey @MatthewHoobin: actually found it on Newspapers.com! Just by searching for Robot in the Family. Its just in a section in the paper saying "New On Home Video" and is the earliest mention of the film I could find. Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:26, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Andrzejbanas: Oh heck, my bad. I've found it. I added a clipping to the citation just now for verifiability. —Matthew - (talk) 21:47, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Sins of Rome (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Renzo Rossellini

Tutta la città canta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Musical

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:33, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Highlander (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tony Mitchell

Sins of Rome (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Renzo Rossellini

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:25, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Daughter of Darkness (1990 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Jack Coleman and Bates Motel

Highlander (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tony Mitchell

La voce senza volto (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Domenico Scala

The Black Eagle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dubrovsky

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"The Holy Mountain (1926 fillm)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Holy Mountain (1926 fillm). Since you had some involvement with the The Holy Mountain (1926 fillm) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC678 15:50, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Toweroflondonfilm.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Toweroflondonfilm.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ASPHALT orig colour.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ASPHALT orig colour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fernando Di Leo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Margaret Lee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:13, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apple Music editors' notes

Can we use Apple Music editors' notes? [1] However did not find evidence of editorial oversight. 2402:1980:246:10B4:3E04:479D:E039:3C13 (talk) 11:40, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Two Faces of Fear, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manuel Rojas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:12, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nazi zombies

I try my best to add information to the list article "Nazi zombies". It lists the Films & Television, Video Games, and Books & Other, sources of Nazi Zombie related materials. I have tried my best to make it a better, more complete list. Other people keep coming along to vandalize the page, and delete relevant information. It is so hard to try and make a single article better when others just try to keep tearing down my efforts. I have tried to do non bias contributions, and list all the relevant information in the list of "Nazi Zombie" horror pop culture sources. Someone even tried to claim a copyright issue on the image of a "Nazi Zombie" that was shown on the article. I was 100% the creator of that image. There was no copyright violation, but the image was deleted anyways. I made a Nazi Zombie horror movie. I was just trying to make the article better by listing all the Movies, Video Games, and Comic Books that relate to Nazi Zombies. To make it a better list article.ZombieHorrorMovie13 (talk) 14:34, 18 April 2020

I try to be constructive and add information, when others try to be Fascists over what they think their stupid rules are, and delete relevant information. how about you try to be a constructive person, and stop trying to tear the world down. There were other people that were good people that added info to the article. I didn't revert their edits.ZombieHorrorMovie13 (talk) 14:48, 18 April 2020

I don't think assuming the world is against you here. If there are rules it should be clear which are the ones to follow. Just like trying to build anything, it would be better to follow the rules which include having reliable sources, yes, even in list articles @ZombiieHorrorMOviie13:. Andrzejbanas (talk) 09:01, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Again, Bad People came along and deleted a good article, "Don't Play No Game I Can't Win" was a good article, and A-Holes deleted it. I do not "seem to think if anyone edits or changes your edits, they are vandalizing". Some people changed my edits for the better. The vandalism is deleting information, or whole articles. You came here to this article, "Nazi zombies" and deleted information from the intro. You also are just trying to tear everything down and delete it all. If you want your sourcing requirements, how about you add them to the article yourself? How about you go google search all the movies, TV shows, Video Games, and books, and do all the sourcing for them. Instead of deleting information and whole articles. How about you try to be a good constructive person, and not a negative bad destructive person? The only problem here is you attempting to vandalize pages, and delete them all together. ZombieHorrorMovie13 (talk) 10:46, 19 April 2020

Okay, I left your Fascist "Rules-Nazi" needs sourcing banner. But, please just stop from deleting the relevant information to the article. I still feel that the Needs Sourcing banner is vandalism to the page. It is added to say that something is wrong with the article. Added by someone that isn't trying to make the article better. Added by someone that just wants to rub dirt onto the article instead of cleaning it up to make it shine. If you wanted to make it better, you should have instead have done your own research to add sourcing, that only you seemed to want in the first place. Instead, you just wanted to rub dirt onto the article to make it worse, by slapping your banner onto it. Anf, that isn't all you tried to do. You also tried to delete relevant information, besides adding the banner ZombieHorrorMovie13 (talk) 13:22, 19 April 2020

Changing the format, deleting relevant information. "Nazi Zombie Battleground" had 5 titles. I at least included them all to tell the reader that those different titles were all the same movie. You are just butchering the whole article. You even deleted information that I used sourcing on. You are the bad person here. I was trying to be a good person, and give in, to try and comply with adding sourcing. Tried to do re-writes with correct information, when you added sourced information that was still incorrect. God, this whole mess is all your fault. You went and butchered an article. You didn't improve things, you made them worse. You seem to enjoy being combative, and butchering other people's work and effort. The truth. ZombieHorrorMovie13 (talk) 15:18, 19 April 2020

You did work hard on it. And so am I except I'm not violating Wikipedia:Verifiability. I'm trying to keep as much content as you have included (and am learning some new things along the way). I'm not sure how venting to me is going to change my mind on the fact that the article needs sources. Andrzejbanas (talk) 00:23, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All your fault. You butchered the article. The "Films & Television" section doesn't even have the movies listed in the proper release year order anymore. You are messing up the whole article. It had the movies listed in the correct order, which you have screwed up. All your fault. You couldn't just leave things alone in the first place. You had to go and ruin it all. The truth. ZombieHorrorMovie13 (talk) 15:32, 19 April 2020

I'm more curious why the old version mixed television and film without a source, included shorts and films that weren't released or even made such as Worst Case Scenario. How does that help? Also I'm including a source for all the years of release if I can find them in the article so I'm not sure what you mean.Andrzejbanas (talk) 00:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to just give up. I am quitting. The user, "Andrzejbanas", butchered the article I was working on. I was going to add more films, and video games, and printed materials to the list. The user, "Andrzejbanas", came along and deleted way too much relevant information to the subject matter in the article "Nazi zombies". He mixed up the order of the films, which had been ordered by release date. The whole article has been butchered by the user, "Andrzejbanas". I tried to fix it up, and improve the overall quality, but he kept combating my efforts. He kept trying to undermine everything, and succeed in butchering the article. I am now done with Wikipedia all together. I have given up. I will not try to add any more contributions to Human knowledge, when people like "Andrzejbanas" just want to censor, vandalize, and tear everything down. You win, small minded Fascist people. I have given up.ZombieHorrorMovie13 (talk) 15:48, 19 April 2020

Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge

Hi, feel free to add your articles to this! We don't get many films coming in!† Encyclopædius 21:26, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blood and Black Lace

Hello Andrzejbanas, you reverted my edit yesterday.

Original poster in the article in Italian

Producing countries Italy, France and Germany

Directed by Mario Bava - Italian

Produced by Massimo Patrizi and Alfredo Mirabile - both Italien

Screenplay by Marcello Fondato, Giuseppe Barilla and Mario Bava - all Italien

Story by Marcello Fondato - Italian

Music by Carlo Rustichelli - Italien

Cinematography Ubaldo Terzano - Italien

Edited by Mario Serandrei - Italien

Original title: Sei donne per l’assassino

And language English?? Really? Where is the reference for this?

References for language Italian:

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058567/ I know not the best reference

https://www.rogerebert.com/streaming/the-politics-of-murdered-and-murderous-women-part-1-mario-bavas-blood-and-black-lace

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blutige_Seide

Please undo your edit. Regards --Serols (talk) 08:05, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Merge of contributions)

Hi Serols. Although I agree with you its an Italian production, Tim Lucas, who wrote an entire comprehensive documentary on Bava states that the films script was written in English and the cast spoke English on the set (its in the prose of the article). Sounds a bit convoluted for a production four non-English production countries, but that is why I reverted your edit. Andrzejbanas (talk) 09:35, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello Andrzejbanas, please lead the discussion where it started.

That is the only source that says so, all others write language: Italian.

All other Wikipedias write Italian:

https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sei_donne_per_l%27assassino

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_femmes_pour_l%27assassin

https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sei_donne_per_l%E2%80%99assassino

https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sei_donne_per_l%27assassino

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blutige_Seide

They are all wrong, only Wikipedia.en is correct? Think you don't really believe that now.

Again, please undo your edit, otherwise I'll do it. Thanks and Regards --Serols (talk) 10:53, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I won't and it shouldn't be removed. Also, all those articles are not sourced. Ours is the only one that's per WP:RS and WP:OR. Andrzejbanas (talk) 10:57, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist: sorry for pinging you, but we need a third opinion here. Can you help us please. Regards --Serols (talk) 11:28, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've made a discussion point of it on the films talks page. Probably best to continue the conversation there. Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:42, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Rock Box

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rock Box you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 00:20, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pickuponsouthstreet.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pickuponsouthstreet.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Rock Box

The article Rock Box you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rock Box for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 14:40, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Youngmrlincoln.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Youngmrlincoln.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Emanuellearoundtheworld.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Emanuellearoundtheworld.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Rock Box

The article Rock Box you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rock Box for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 00:41, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gangbuster (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ray Lovelock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cat People

Hi, Andrzejbanas. Thanks for your expansion of Cat People. Great work! I've carried out a thorough copy-edit ahead of its GA review. Let me know what you think. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 04:46, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Crescendo (1970 film)

Hi, and thanks for all your work on WP. I ran across this edit while fixing the typo at the bottom for "frequent→frequent". It appears that the word "been" might have been omitted while transcribing the quotation. As it is in a quotation, I didn't want to just "fix" it. Can you help? --LilHelpa (talk) 00:05, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rome Against Rome, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peplum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:16, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Roy Colt & Winchester Jack (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Antonio Rinaldi

The Battle of El Alamein (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to George Hilton

The Road to Fort Alamo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mario Costa

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:15, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop Stalking me

I don't know why you are harassing me, but every day you keep deleting all my edits and writing nasty things on my talk page about how I am intentionally vandalizing wikipedia. I think you are stalking me or harassing me for some reason, and I am asking you not to write any more to my talk page. If you persist in cluttering up my talk page and harassing me, I will seek help from an administrator to prevent the harassment. I will report you for harassment. Do not write to my talk page again! If you don't like my edits, report me to wikipedia but do NOT write to me again.FrankensteinsDad (talk) 17:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by FrankensteinsDad (talk • contribs)

Your editing patterns continue to be adding material that's against the rules of Wikipedia, even after I've explained why they don't follow the rules you continue to use them again, I've even suggested you seek discussion from WP:FILM. so @FrankensteinsDad:, I'll be happy to stop removing or editing them, but you have to add material that actually reflects the content of your sources, which you have been very obviously been misinterpreting or using citing inappropriately. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:28, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't work for you. In fact, I don't even get paid for doing this. I'm sorry as hell that you don't like my edits, but I can't put up with your harassment. If you think I'm purposely vandalizing wikipedia, REPORT ME! Get me thrown off. Have me arrested even! But don't keep posting your nasty comments on my talk page. I don't want to hear how i'm vandalizing wikipedia when I spend hundreds of hours trying to improve the site without getting paid a cent! I don't need the aggravation. So just report me and get my account cancelled, but DO'NT WRITE TO MY TALK PAGE any more. I will consider it stalking and harassment. I will report you for harassment if you keep accusing me of vandalism. Go harass some other poor soul. FrankensteinsDad (talk) 17:47, 14 May 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by FrankensteinsDad (talk • contribs)

There are thousands of people editing wikipedia, but you follow me every day from page to page, nitpicking and second guessing me on every bit of info I add to the site. That is harassment! If you don't like an edit I do, delete it. If you think I'm intentionally vandalizing wikipedia, then by all means, report me and get me kicked off. But there's no need to clutter up my talk page with dozens of warnings and threats, you're just harassing me. Just delete my work and report me. But again I am asking you DO NOT WRITE TO MY TALK PAGE. I will consider it harassment and I will report it. You're just trying to fill up my talk page with threats and notices pointing out how incompetent I am and how knowledgeable you are, and I don't want to hear it. Just report me and have my account blocked, ok? But LEAVE ME ALONE!!! and do not write to my Talk Page any more!FrankensteinsDad (talk) 18:36, 14 May 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by FrankensteinsDad (talk • contribs)

@FrankensteinsDad:, I'm not sure how we can communicate to solve issues with articles if you don't want me to post on your talk page, but its relatively standard to give people warnings that can be viewed as vandalism. I'm not trying to call you out and we both seem to have interests in the same material to write about on Wikipedia. One goal on Wikipedia is to form a consensus and its okay to make mistakes, but when you repeat them, I'm not really sure what to do. Please do not take my warnings personally, I am just trying to maintain the rules so you are not banned/etc. If you feel I'm doing anything in an error, please discuss it with an administrator, I'll be happy to discuss it. Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:43, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are not my father. No one on wikipedia assigned you to watch over me and constantly delete all my edits and threaten me every time you don't agree with something I write. If wikipedia has appointed you to harass me, please tell them to appoint a different editor to monitor me and you can "communicate" with the thousands of other editors on wikipedia, I'm sure there are many people working on the site who don't mind being bullied and threatened and having all of their edits reverted every day like clockwork. You don't own wikipedia. If the people in charge of the site feel i'm vandalizing it, then let them block my account and I will waste my life at some other endeavor. But you're not my father, and you don't have to obsess over stalking me every day, trying to undo all my contributions. Just stop following me and writing to me, that's all I ask. Don't you have a life? If not, please get one! I will report you for harassment every time you bother me from now on. Any site that can't prevent its editors from being harassed isn't worth contributing to anyway. No sane person would put up with a stalker like this bothering them every day.FrankensteinsDad (talk) 19:19, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've posted a follow-up on your page. Also, please refrain for rude comments on my or any talk page here. I'd rather discuss our edits than behaviours here. Please keep in mind WP:GOODFAITH, where we assume editors are trying to make positive changes on wikipedia. Your edits mean well, but they break the rules so they require formatting/clean-up and in some cases removal. I've tried explaining this to you, but I'm not really sure how to re-phrase it so you understand what I'm trying to get at here. Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:34, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Danger on the Air (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Crime Club

Father of the Godfathers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to I Am the Law

Inner Sanctum Mystery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to David Hoffman

Jungle Woman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Richard Davis

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Black Rose Mansion.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Black Rose Mansion.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 26

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Father of the Godfathers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to I Am the Law

Zapp II (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to George Clinton

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:15, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jam on Revenge

Hi... just a quick question, do you think the title of this album should be Jam On Revenge, with the "on" capitalized? It strikes me from reading the article that the artists use "jam on" throughout their productions as a phrasal verb "to keep on jamming", and not in the sense of putting jam on top of revenge, so the title is "the revenge of Jam On Productions" – that's my reading of it. Richard3120 (talk) 16:26, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply, I just wondered if as the article creator you had more information about the album and group than I did, I didn't want to change anything without being sure. I'll see if I can find out anything else that would give us a definite clue one way or the other - I don't think a rename is a pressing issue at the moment. Richard3120 (talk) 18:52, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Vampyros-soundtrack.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vampyros-soundtrack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No UFO's article

Thanks for the No UFO's article you've recently created, it's a great song and I love electronic music! I wonder if it's possible to turn it into a GA. I«ias!:,,.:usbk»I 08:51, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @I'm Aya Syameimaru!: I agree on the great song factor, thanks for adding the sound sample and pic in there (too bad we don't have a better free pic to use of Juan!). I think the article needs a bit more beefing up a pinch before I can submit it as a GA. At least some information on the songs reception and actual composition. as that information is a bit small. I don't expect it to be as large and as the article on "Planet Rock", but we'll see what we can do. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:57, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. I«ias!:,,.:usbk»I 18:06, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 3

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

The Case of the Black Cat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Craig Reynolds

The Cat Creeps (1946 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to George Robinson

The Mummy's Hand (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Green Hell

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:StarsInMyCrown.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:StarsInMyCrown.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Parasite Eve film

This would be a good article to get to Good Article status, since it’s technically outside of Wikiproject Square Enixs purview, this article will be needed when we get the videos games to GA and the book as well, then we can have a Parasite Eve good topic! Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:00, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 10

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Crocodile (2000 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Lake Placid, Michael Weiss, Jack Anderson and Gary Jones

Children of the Living Dead (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Colorization

The Monster and the Girl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Black Friday

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Marenostrumposter.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Marenostrumposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Squirm

I'm really worried about the Squirm FAC being failed in less than a week. I'm hoping you can answer whether or not you support or oppose the nomination. I still think that the Fangoria source is not much of an issue, though. GamerPro64 03:47, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know that I took care of the Leonard Maltin book comment you brought up. GamerPro64 04:57, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 17

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Night Games (1980 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to John Barry and Paul Jenkins

The Raven (1935 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to The Invisible Ray and Michael Simmons

Chinatown Squad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to George Robinson

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Horror Newsletter - June 2020

Sent by Path slopu on the behalf of WikiProject Horror.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:45, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Skin of the South

The Galbraith source is outdated, published in 2008. The latest Honda book by Ryfle and Godziszewski, published in 2017, refers to the film by that title in multiple chapters. So we have a reliable and fresher source to cite the English title under, which is exactly what I did in the lead. Armegon (talk) 22:07, 20 June 2020 (UTC) @Armegon:, Galbraith's book goes specifically into detailing what films had English titles and not. Does the 2017 book actually state how they used titles? It's common for writers to use English names even if they are directly translated one, but we shouldn't apply a title to a film that wasn't presented it that way. Andrzejbanas (talk) 22:09, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Honda TV wikitable

Is it truly necessary to revert back to the old edit for the sake of illustrating the episodes that Honda directed? If the latter is so important, we can list the Honda-directed episodes in an EFN next to the episode count in the notes column. It's overkill to list the airdates of every single Honda-directed episode when a year column would suffice. Noting the channel where it aired on is redundant and trivial to English readers who likely aren't familiar with those channels. If the channels are so important, then we can list them in the same efn as the episodes list. The current TV wikitable is a mess. We should go by the recommendations of WP:FILMOGRAPHY. Armegon (talk) 22:52, 20 June 2020 (UTC) I'm happy to remove the networks which aren't too important, but I think the episodes in question would be of interest to our readers. I would keep the original release dates as well as it gives specific details of when his work premiered. These episodes aren't going to get unique articles any time soon, so I don't think it hurts anything. I'd say its a bit of a stretch to call it a mess, what parts of WP:FILMOGRAPHY are we or aren't we following here? Andrzejbanas (talk) 23:15, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So we are in agreement to remove the non-essential networks. As for the others. Part of why I feel the current table is a mess is because the airdates and episodes are stacked and stacked upon each other, generating one rowspan after another that excessively extends the table. It comes off as unorganized. WP:FILMOGRAPHY's recommendation keeps the table simple and contained. Like I said, we can still retain the airdates and episode lists in the new table through an EFN. Like this:

Year	Title	Director	Notes
1971	The Return of Ultraman	Yes	5 episodes^[a]

^ "Charge of the Monsters" - Airdate: April 2, 1971
"Takkong's Great Revenge" - Airdate: April 9, 1971
"Operation Monster Rainbow" - Airdate: May 14, 1971
"SOS Monster Island" - May 29, 1971
"The Five Ultra Pledges" - Airdate: March 31, 1971

The actual expanded notes will be shown below the article. Not on top of the table like it shows here. Feel free to remove the table. I only added it as an example to my proposal. Armegon (talk) 00:04, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, what do you think? It's a solid compromise that combines the old edit and the new edit. Armegon (talk) 04:53, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cat People (1942 film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cat People (1942 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 17:21, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Noise Made by People.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Noise Made by People.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hahasound.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hahasound.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Workandnonwork.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Workandnonwork.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Viking Crown albums

A tag has been placed on Category:Viking Crown albums requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:32, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SHEWOLFOFLONDON2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SHEWOLFOFLONDON2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Houseofhorrors.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Houseofhorrors.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Action film

How do I explain to you that the various genres you removed here had many incoming links? You could have at least left them as bullet points with anchor links. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:26, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792:. Then unlink them. If we have a genre that we can't back-up, we shouldn't be linking them. If we can, then get sources and re-add them. Either way, I think we should move the argument to the talk page of the article. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:32, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of content from Ghost Town (Kanye West song)

Hi, I understand that you removed rap rock as a genre from this article because it was not directly stated; however, why was hip hop removed when the New Yorker ref directly backs that up? --Kyle Peake (talk) 13:03, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, must have missed that @Kyle Peake:. Please re-add it. :) Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:07, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have already but thanks for the reminder anyway. --Kyle Peake (talk) 13:12, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Lady and the Monster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arthur Roberts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Invisiblemansrevenge.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Invisiblemansrevenge.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lady-and-monster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lady-and-monster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Danger: Diabolik

Was thinking about the prospect of Diabolik to become a Featured Article. Have you ever thought about nominating it there because I believe it can take a nomination. GamerPro64 02:03, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've been tempted to make some articles I've worked on to push them for a FA @GamerPro64:, but I've always felt they weren't good enough. I think the only thing Diabolik might really be weak in is its actual filming section, but failing that, I'd be happy to try to give it a push. Andrzejbanas (talk) 02:52, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Maybe it would need a Peer Review first. GamerPro64 04:10, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Given the expansions I've made on the article lately, would a FA review be more viable now, or would there need to be further work done? PatTheMoron (talk) 13:24, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Parasite Eve (film)

Hello, Andrzejbanas. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Parasite Eve (film) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 05:55, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Linking "rap-folk" on Loser (Beck song)

If "Rap-folk" is not a definitive genre which are users are doing by linking them, do you think you could take a look?115.164.181.148 (talk) 06:39, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cat People (1942 film)

The article Cat People (1942 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cat People (1942 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 08:21, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Horror Newsletter - July 2020

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:27, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Horror Island, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Otto Ludwig.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question

This is embarrassing to ask given my years editing on Wiki, but what is "prose"? I keep seeing that word in talk pages. I googled it but I feel like that may have a different definition to the wiki definition. Armegon (talk) 22:56, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Armegon:, haha no worries. Prose is the just text as a whole. Am i using it in a context that doesn't make sense? I can explain it further if you need more help Andrzejbanas (talk) 00:28, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A little more context would be appreciated, if you don’t mind :) Armegon (talk) 03:18, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the slow reply. I'm basically saying its the writing. Perhaps if you say it as a sentence, or read it somewhere you don't understand, I can make it more clear @Armegon: Andrzejbanas (talk) 08:04, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Acid Tracks"

Thank you so much for restoring this article... I'd been working on it in my sandbox since the redirect, because for those who know it's clearly it's one of the most influential electronic dance music tracks of all time, and it's ridiculous that it didn't have its own article while thousands of barely notable songs do. I have some more legacy text that I can add to the article, but I'll wait until you're done editing, in case I cause an edit conflict. Richard3120 (talk) 16:31, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome! Yeah I got into a frenzy of updating after seeing how such a popular article did not even have a stubby article. I think I'm generally done for now if you want to add things. Andrzejbanas (talk) 01:54, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eazy Duz It

There has been many sources over the years that it was released on Sept 16. Even Discogs confirm the release date. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.147.78.75 (talk) 15:50, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Refer to my comment on the talk page of the article. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:21, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like half of what I come across have a Nov' 88 release date, but it appears on CD releases from what I come across. Regarding Sep 13/16, I would assume those were the on cassette and vinyl as the earliest possible releases. Same with Straight Outta Compton on vinyl/cassette being the original and CD released later. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.203.10.165 (talk) 16:11, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. Can you tell me your sources for this? Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:13, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On Amazon the releases were for cassette/LP were 9/16. On Ebay (for CD) and that book, it was 11/23. But knowing you, that ain't good enough.

Yeah fair enough. Makes it tricky to pin point this stuff down. Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:17, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So all the sources that shows both release dates ain't enough? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.203.11.66 (talk) 16:55, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just finding two release dates does not mean one is more correct than the other. I can provide several more, so we need one that clarifies this. Andrzejbanas (talk) 02:58, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Where are the sources? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.147.68.180 (talk) 16:21, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Book source as stated in article

AllMusic November 26, 1988

RIAA just says 1989.So there you go. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:06, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's it? You said before that Discogs isn't reliable. But are those sites as accurate and reliable? I notice ISRC, the date Jan 1. Any album with an unknown release date has Jan 1. But any date that shows otherwise is fan-based. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.147.68.180 (talk) 17:28, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AllMusic is one of the largest music databases online. It does not take information from user sources without any content and has been used as a source from several sources from The New York Times and Microsoft music players. It's very much reliable. Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:11, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like it does. It isn't that reliable as a source. There's actually been criticism and skepticism of AllMusic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.147.68.180 (talk) 20:03, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is some, but that was predominantly for genre discussions (if there are others, please show me). Regardless, with very little indepth research we have found about four different sources and the one that actually specifically states where the information is from, is the book. For the record, we should probably move this conversation to the talk page of the album. Andrzejbanas (talk) 00:58, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And just only one book. And there are two other books, one being Dr. Dre's Biography showing it came out in Sept. And RateYourMusic shows that month as well.

What's the Dr. Dre book? Also, RateYourMusic is another user-based fan site that takes in submissions. I would suggest reading WP:RS before suggesting other sources to get confirmation for these types of things. Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:51, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.google.com/books/edition/Dr_Dre/IxE6AQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0. Also, what makes you think AMG is that reliable? It's no more different from RYM is Discogs. The user-generated content I see on the latter sites are from comments and reviews. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.147.68.180 (talk) 14:52, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to check that, I would take up with WP:ALBUMS etc. It's been established as fine there outside a few bits and bobs. I know we don't use the genre field. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:28, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Acid Tracks

Just to acknowledge, really great work on this. It was always amazing to me that one of the most seminal and important tracks of the last 40 years was alternating between a stub and a redirect. You have done a great job in both conveying its almost by accident genesis, and slow build cultural importance. Ceoil (talk) 15:31, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I've received a few comments like this so I'm glad others have clicked in on it. There's a few more tracks like this one I'd like to cover. It's so funny how so many of these songs have changed have relatively complicated histories. Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:58, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, without the track we wouldn't have had Acid House or raves. And it really resonates, even today. The first time I heard it was c 1989, and my mind almost melted...what am I listening to, how on earth did they do this??!! I have a few more book sources on the history of the track, so may add in the next week or so. Ceoil (talk) 16:17, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ps, Stakker Humanoid is another one with a very good back story, currently not covered by its article. Also, how come Shoom is a red link! Anyway, thanks again for the work. Ceoil (talk) 16:20, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed about Shroom! I'm surprised "Move Your Body" also has no article either for that matter (i'm not as crazy about that track but...still a big-ish track right?) Lotta late 1980s dance classics to seek out. Andrzejbanas (talk) 08:12, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Have made an attempt at Shoom, if you have other source or could help. Ceoil (talk)

Monty Python and the Holy Grail

Hello. I apologise to bother you, but if you don't mind, I would like to ask a question. I propose to add the information regarding Monty Python and the Holy Grail as a parody of costume movies' clichés. I would support it with the following sources: the Monty Python's official website ("The movie sends up costume picture clichés"), the New York Times article ("it manages to send up the legend, courtly love, fidelity, bravery, costume movies"). Like Monty Python's Life of Brian, The Holy Grail would be then included in the "British parody films" category. You are an experienced user, and you contributed in Life of Brian, so I would like to discuss it with you. Could you help me with that, please? Thanks a lot! --89.66.254.10 (talk) 18:05, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Horror Newsletter - August 2020

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:09, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Electro house

added a link pointing to Digitalism

Layers of Fear

added a link pointing to Horror

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Slackerposter.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Slackerposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:43, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Strike-Commando-2-poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Strike-Commando-2-poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ~ GB fan 10:49, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mentioned

Hi Andrzejbanas. Your name was mentioned at User talk:EdJohnston#Blocked IP 68.129.15.71 seems to be back as user EuroHorrorGuy. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 14:08, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
Diversity winner - $100
Gender-gap fillers - $100
Language Winners - up to $100*

We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited War of the Robots (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medium.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:32, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of horror films of 2006 and others

I saw you reverted PoisonOnHisLips's edits on List of horror films of 2006 and I looked through their various additions to "List of horror films of X year" articles and none of them are horror films. Further none of the references this person is adding call them horror films. 9 out of 10 times the word "horror" doesn't even appear in the reference and that 10th time it is in a context speaking of the horror of a situation and not calling the film horror. I reverted most of them after looking through the references but they seemed to to just wait a few hours after you reverted them to do it again so I don't know if the entries will be restored by the time you read this. Helper202 (talk) 23:30, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The-unknown-purple-newspaper-ad.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The-unknown-purple-newspaper-ad.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Islandoflostsouls.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Islandoflostsouls.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:44, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of horror television programs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inner Sanctum.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:42, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Parasite Eve (film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Parasite Eve (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 06:01, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Parasite Eve (film)

The article Parasite Eve (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Parasite Eve (film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 15:02, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited La belva col mitra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anchor Bay.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for your helpful edit to Bloodlust Zombies! What do you think of the new article so far? Right cite (talk) 14:38, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:The Business (band) albums

A tag has been placed on Category:The Business (band) albums requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:14, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blood and Black Lace

Hi there, I like a lot of your work on the Blood and Black Lace article, and have made some expansions and corrections of my own. I have also nominated the article for GA status, although I think there is potentially more work to be done, as I'm concerned with the writer's credit in the infobox, although reviewers might be able to give their own suggestions. Thanks! PatTheMoron (talk) 06:47, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @PatTheMoron:. Thanks for tackling a copy-edit. I was going to submit it for a GA-review but I had submitted it for a copy-edit initially. Looks like it's gone through all that. I went through your edits and everything seems hunky dory. I'm not too concerned about the writing edits in the infobox. The screenwriting history per Curti's book on the film showcase that its very unclear who exactly wrote it and some credits seem to be likely fabricated based on Bertrand Tavernier's statements, so they should be taken with a grain of salt. I've had other articles in the past where credits were considered unclear and I generally think the best solution is to follow standard infobox guidelines. That being that the infobox should reflect the information in the article in a simple and clean manner, if it can't, then it probably shouldn't. Andrzejbanas (talk) 11:21, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers! The other main thing I think could be added is a track listing for the soundtrack. Even though we sometimes butt heads with regards to our edits, I'm glad we're in agreement on the state of this article. PatTheMoron (talk) 11:41, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! :) I'm glad we are able to work together. haha. The soundtrack is a tricky one as it's honestly a relatively obscure soundtrack with little information on its release and is not readily available (even if it took years for a full score to be released, standard stuff from some older genre films). I don't think it's 100% essential for the article. I know I've added it in the past to films like Eyes Without a Face, and I dig the score, but I don't think it's 100% needed. Andrzejbanas (talk) 11:44, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All good - with regards to the Masked Killer screenshot, I get your idea with regards to the info that should be beneath it and the colour timing, but I can't overwrite the current file with a screenshot from the Arrow Blu-ray - do you think it'll be fine if I just upload an entirely new image for it, or just stick with it? PatTheMoron (talk) 11:47, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, depends on what we are trying to say with it. I believe what you were saying before with the statement is that its killer is a masked black-gloved psychopath of gialli history, but I don't think it really accurate that it set the template per se (as stated, several Krimi's and several Italian comics featured similar villains), not to mention there's black-gloved unknown killers in The Girl Who Knew Too Much and I Vampiri too! Gah!). The killer in this film has kind of an awesome look to him, and I was trying myself at one point to shoe him into the article, but I couldn't find any concrete things. Some people have suggested the faceless look had influenced Carpenter to do Michael Myers, but way back (in 2006(!)) when i was working on the Eyes Without a Face article, Carpenter seems to say he doens't know where the idea came from, but suggested maybe Eyes Without a Face. I'm kind of more comfortable with specific relations and authors admitting influence than assumptions that seem to contradict what the creators say. Hell, Carpenter might not have even seen this one. I uhh, went off on a bit of a tangent there, but yeah, if you want to add it with a specific statement, it would depend on what were are trying to say and illustrate. Like, I included the blood pooling in the tub scene at the bottom as it is specifically referenced by a few major filmmakers, I feel that could pass for a copywritten image, y'know? Andrzejbanas (talk) 11:53, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I probably will get a screengrab from my own Arrow Blu-ray of the same scene. Part of the reason I mentioned in the caption that Unger doubled for both Mitchell and Bartok was because, from what I can recall, The Masked Killer started a trend of a killer who was not only multi-identity, but multi-gendered. I'll have a scan through some of Lucas' material and the Arrow special features, specifically the "Gender and Giallo" video essay to see if it comes up, since the multi-identity/gender aspect was one of the biggest influences on The Bird with the Crystal Plumage. PatTheMoron (talk) 12:04, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. I know it's totally against wiki standards, but doing this (especially with such a striking image no doubt) is going to spoil this film for countless readers. ;) I know there is no rules against that on wikipedia, but even when i'm just scrumming through an article, i tend to avoid reading plot sections to avoid spoilers myself. If you can add proper expansion on it, I think it could be alright (probably in the legacy section more so though). Honestly, the image itself isn't 100% necessary for understanding that factor of the genre, we know the person is masked and unidentifyiable, is it really required to have an image shown to illustrate that it hides the gender? Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:09, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How about this as a example? "Gofreddo Unger (doubling for Cameron Mitchell and Eva Bartok) as The Masked Killer. Tim Lucas has noted that the depiction of a "split identity" villain - an evolution from the split personality present in such films as Psycho - predates its later use in the Scream franchise, while Michael MacKenzie has noted that the disguising of the character(s)' gender would become a recurring element in other gialli, particularly the films of Dario Argento." 12:22, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

I mean, they did it first, but it's not like Scream franchise is specifically influenced by that. I think maybe this information would belong better in the giallo article. It's not really needed as an image either so far to understand the context. Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:32, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I might come back to it if I have another idea regarding the use of the image. PatTheMoron (talk) 12:34, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. maybe bring it up on the talk page there. Thanks for chatting it out first. Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I decided to put the info under the image on the giallo page instead for the time being. PatTheMoron (talk) 12:40, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thriller

Ok, I added those dates again because I misunderstood the edit summary, sorry. --Blueberry72 (talk) 13:37, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Just dig up the sources for it and it should be good. :) Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:38, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

JPL on Diabolik

I can understand your concern with regards to bias in JPL's quote about Diabolik, but even though it's especially flattering towards the film, I think it is important to present his view on the film, especially with regards to its frequent framing as Barbarella's less-known but better-regarded brother. PatTheMoron (talk) 03:21, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not against him saying this, but it feels a bit promo-y. If you can find a decent way to sneak it in sure, but placing it as big block quote seems a bit much and I can't see a way to squeeze it in without it just being a bit shoved in there. Y'know? Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:22, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could I perhaps use the block quote, but drop his last sentence "I think Diabolik probably is the masterpiece"? I think that it becomes less promo-y that way. PatTheMoron (talk) 03:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, I just feel like it's kind of a weak quote. He's pulls a quote from "a book" (what book?) and just state hes agrees with it, but doesn't state why. I find it interesting as a fan, but I really don't think it's as revealing or important to readers and just feels like a way for fans to pat themselves on the back for liking this film. Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:30, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay. I might leave it alone for now. PatTheMoron (talk) 03:31, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thanks for stopping by with your helpful edit to Superman vs. Spider-Man XXX: An Axel Braun Parody! What do you think of the recent improvements to the page? Right cite (talk) 19:24, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Barbarella

Hey there! I've got two queries for you regarding Barbarella - they're on the talk page over there. PatTheMoron (talk) 22:46, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blood and Black Lace

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Blood and Black Lace has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:28, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!

Greetings,

Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.

It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.

Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
Diversity winner - $100
Gender-gap filler - $100
Language Winners - up to $100*

We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!

Thank you once again for being part of this global event! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Son of Frankenstein

Hello, Andrzejbanas. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Son of Frankenstein at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 05:10, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Son of Frankenstein

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Son of Frankenstein you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:40, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me

It is not hard for me to look up for sources, and I did, but seems it's even simpler for you to remove what's already sourced. If the article mentioned this film as simply "horror", I consider it a vandalism from your side to remove entirely any mentions of horror genre in the definition and categories.--Zukazaka (talk) 17:37, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Son of Frankenstein

Congrats dude! The article you were working on, Son of Frankenstein, has passed the Good Article criteria, becoming a good article on November 23, 2020.

Great job on the improvements! For you're hard work, I award you this image of a cute cat. Enjoy!

Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 19:47, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent! I'll treasure this kitty. Thanks for taking the time to review the article. :) Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:48, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Son of Frankenstein

The article Son of Frankenstein you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Son of Frankenstein for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Genuine plakat.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Genuine plakat.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aeon flux poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aeon flux poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Universal Monsters template

but I wanted to mention the Universal films after 1956 because I feel like those films are important too

- User:Minemaster1337

I'm not saying they aren't important, it's a matter of if they belong or not. I'll make a post about it there soon. Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:05, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Metal Storm

Can you tell me (mostly out of curiosity) where http://www.metalstorm.net/pub/article.php?article_id=68 is listed as an editable wiki?

Sure. Perhaps I was wrong calling it a wiki, but it appears to be a power by message boards and run by a group of enthusiastic fans [2] rather then be a notable publication. They seem to do great work but it's source as a reliable source seems questionable just based on how they run. It's tricky with these metal-based scenes. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:35, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Black Abbot (1963 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hermann Haller.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BloodRayne Film Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BloodRayne Film Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mammatus (band)

The article Mammatus (band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources are unreliable, could not find any other reliable references. Fails WP:BAND.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JayJay^{What did I do?} 00:13, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Flesh-for-frankenstein-german-movie-poster-md.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Flesh-for-frankenstein-german-movie-poster-md.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blood and Black Lace and other Bavas

Hey there! I'm helping Gerald Waldo Luis with his suggestions at Talk:Blood and Black Lace/GA1, and was hoping to get your expertise, particularly with regards to the article's sources. Also, I had an idea with the infobox conundrum we had with some of Bava's other movies, which I detailed in one of your old entries at Talk:Caltiki – The Immortal Monster. Cheers! PatTheMoron (talk) 12:33, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Merry!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Andrzejbanas, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021.
Happy editing,
★Trekker (talk) 15:49, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kill, Baby, Kill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Giorgio Bianchi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Murders in the Rue Morgue (1932 film)

Hello, Andrzejbanas. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Murders in the Rue Morgue (1932 film) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 02:37, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Black Sunday (1960 film)

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Black Sunday (1960 film) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:01, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kill Baby Kill

Hi again - do you think much work needs to be done on Kill, Baby, Kill before it can be put up for a GA nomination? There are some areas that could be expanded, but I think it at least covers everything of interest related to the film. PatTheMoron (talk) 09:54, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Hey. I have about two GA's going at the moment, i'd like to at least give the reception section a do-over for Kill, Baby, Kill and maybe submit it for a copy-edit first. Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:32, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Understood - I'll see what else I can contribute in the meantime. Afterwards, it might be worthwhile for us to really give The Whip and the Body a good hot crack. PatTheMoron (talk) 13:38, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Whip and the Body could definitely use an overhall as could A Bay of Blood (not that it's bad, but needs a tidy up!). The sad thing is I haven't actually seen those two films yet! Eep! Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:44, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, at least you can fall back on me in that regard (I'll probably need to write Whip's summary)... hope you enjoy them once you get around to them! PatTheMoron (talk) 02:36, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As another point, I'm thinking this image (https://screen-slate-rails.herokuapp.com/system/images/W1siZiIsIjIwMTcvMDcvMDcvMTcvMDQvMTIvMGFjOWYzMmYtZGIzMS00YTRhLTgzNTMtMTI3ZWRiMDE4ZDc0L0ZlYXR1cmVkLTE3MDcxMS1LaWxsQmFieS5qcGciXV0/Featured-170711-KillBaby.jpg?sha=1fda958f55d80914) might be a better example of what to illustrate in the legacy section with regards to Melissa's influence, since here (unlike my first attempt) she's holding her white ball. PatTheMoron (talk) 08:57, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like there isn't really an image that states her influence too well because you can describe how she looks without it. Perhaps if you had some text backing up the androgynous/unique look of Melissa, it might make it more copyright-friendly. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:09, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Beastfromhauntedcave.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beastfromhauntedcave.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Looking for the Perfect Beat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electro.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Murders in the Rue Morgue (1932 film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Murders in the Rue Morgue (1932 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 18:40, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Murders in the Rue Morgue (1932 film)

Congrats dude! The article you were working on, Murders in the Rue Morgue (1932 film), has passed the GA-criteria, becoming a good article on January 21, 2021.

Great job on the improvements! For you're hard work, I award you this interesting image of a "Sweet Brown Snail". Enjoy!

Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 21:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Murders in the Rue Morgue (1932 film)

The article Murders in the Rue Morgue (1932 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Murders in the Rue Morgue (1932 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Weirsky

I started a draft about Michael Weirsky. Can you please make it a full article that is a good article or featured article, please? I would prefer it to be featured article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Michael_Weirsky — Preceding unsigned comment added by LotteryGeek (talk • contribs) 17:45, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TestamentOfDrMabuse-Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TestamentOfDrMabuse-Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jungle Captive, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phil Brown.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Boogiemanwillgetyou.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Boogiemanwillgetyou.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The-Undying-Monster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The-Undying-Monster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TheClimaxPoster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheClimaxPoster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:00, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fromhellitcame.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fromhellitcame.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TetsuoII.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TetsuoII.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tetsuoposter.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tetsuoposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Daimajin-bluray-cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Daimajin-bluray-cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Answer to previous message

Aren't the changes I made to Ley Lines and Shangri-La based on the Wikipedia articles of these two films mentioned as such in Galbraith IV's book? If so, then the articles may be right about the Japanese titles and you may be wrong. And the Japanese title used for The Transparent Man, according to this article, is Tomei ningen arawaru. If the first two words are translated into English as The Transparent Man, then what is the third word translated into English? Doesn't the book say what it is? IIRC, an older version of this article did call this film in English The Transparent Man Appears or something similar to that. Just so you know, in March Arrow Video is officially releasing this film on Blu-ray under the title The Invisible Man Appears along with the 1957 film The Invisible Man vs. the Human Fly (which is called on the list The Transparent Man vs. the Fly Man). Since these titles seem to be the official English titles for these two films, then maybe the ones that are there now should both be changed as well to reflect this knowledge.

Finally, you seem to have some kind of major influence on this article, so I'd like to ask a few favors of you, if you please.

Can you please check the book and see if it mentions Rainbow Man (Niji Otoko (1949); this film came before The Transparent Man Appears and is the earliest Japanese sci-fi tokusatsu film known to exist) and The Invisible Demon (Tomei tengu (1960); another invisible man film Daiei made)? If it does, these two films should be put in the list, as they are important. I don't have the book with me and I don't know where or how to get it offhand.

Can you please change the title of the article to "List of Daiei films" since the word "Films", as it's written, is grammatically incorrect? Failing that, to "List of Daiei film productions"? I don't know how to change article titles.

Aren't the second and third Daimajin films' titles in English supposed to be Return of Daimajin and Daimajin Strikes Again (as they are translated on the Mill Creek Blu-ray release of the trilogy) or is what you have there on the list again taken directly from the book? If so, have you ever considered the possibility that these titles I've mentioned here may be the right ones and the ones that are now on the list may be wrong?

Please reply back to me as soon as you can. Thanks!Mcfoureyes (talk) 05:04, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Mcfoureyes:. To answer your questions:

Rainbow Man is not mentioned in the book. At least not under that title.
the Invisible Man section states Tomei ningen arawaru and yes, the translated title would be Invisible Man Appears. However, its International title (as stated by the book) is The Transparent Man. As the sentence right above the list states, the titles are not direct translations, but their English-language film titles.
There is no mention of Tomei tengen or The Invisible Demon in the book.
For the Daimajin films, the book first states "Majin / Dai Majin" and its translated title (which we don't use, as it's not an official title) as "Great Majin". These films have had several English titles and it's a relatively low-profile series, I haven't found any specific most common names. For example, the first film was released as Majin the Hideous Idol, The Devil Got Angry and The Vengeance of the Monster and as Majin, the Monster of Terror. As you can see, it's had quite a wild release history so I've kept the titles simple on pages, and expanded on them on the Daimajin series article.

As for moving the article, yeah, it should probably be moved. I'll bring that up on the talk page. Andrzejbanas (talk) 05:20, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed the Arrow release, so yes, find a reliable source that backs this up and we should definitely add them as their new most prominent titles. Andrzejbanas (talk) 05:28, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your quick reply! Very interesting indeed!

I had one of the titles wrong; it's Tomei tengu. Could you please check and see if that title is mentioned? If not, then Galbraith IV's book is not all that complete if it's missing these two.

What about the other sources in the References? Do any of them mention these two films?Mcfoureyes (talk) 05:40, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, the book is definitely incomplete. I developed that list when people were just adding any genre film to the list with various bits of inaccuracies (no year of release, no citations, titles and translations sitting next to each other, etc.), in short, it didn't feel very professional. And no doubt Galbraith's book is incomplete, but I'm working with sources I have. :) He made a very nice book which lists nearly all the Toho productions and distributed films they had made, which is far more reaching. Also, there is no mention of Tomei tengu in the book, at least under that title. Andrzejbanas (talk) 05:44, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just found some possible candidates for the 1949 and 1957 invisible man films. They're from blu-ray.com. If anyone knows anything about Blu-ray releases, they do.

www.blu-ray.com/movies/The-Invisible-Man-Appears-and-The-Invisible-Man-vs-The-Human-Fly-Blu-ray/283111/
www.blu-ray.com/movies/The-Invisible-Man-Appears-Blu-ray/283135/
www.blu-ray.com/movies/The-Invisible-Man-vs-The-Human-Fly-Blu-ray/283112/

I hope this counts as a reliable source.

Also, I saw a website called Japanonfilm that listed Rainbow Man. Would that one be considered a reliable source? If it is, I'll use it.Mcfoureyes (talk) 06:05, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not familiar with Japanonfilm, but I'd ask around WP:HORROR or WP:FILM. Per WP:RS/IMDB we should not be using Blu-ray.com as a source as it's a fan-generated community. People seem to be okay with Bloody Disgusting on WP:HORROR, so perhaps use this here @Mcfoureyes: It's an exciting release for sure! Andrzejbanas (talk) 06:39, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all your help! All that remains now is to fix the article's title.

Did you know that Arrow Video has also recently released Warning from Space officially on Blu-ray, too? You might want to consider including a reference to that, too. Just sayin'...2600:1700:7E31:5710:A46A:BDF7:73F8:FCE4 (talk) 02:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed! I'm a big fan of Arrow Video's works. I see that they've released it, but I don't see anything wrong with the title on the page. Is there something I'm missing here? Andrzejbanas (talk) 09:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, no, no, nothing's wrong with the title at all. I was talking about referring to the Blu-ray release.

There's some DVD releases of some Daiei films that haven't been placed in either the Gamera or Daimajin articles yet. Retromedia released these films on DVD before the Alpha Video releases (the titles are as listed):

Destroy All Planets/Attack of the Monsters
Gamera vs. Monster X/Monster from a Prehistoric Planet
Return of the Giant Monsters/The Magic Serpent
Majin the Monster of Terror/Return of the Giant Majin.Mcfoureyes (talk) 04:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you can find sources for them, be my guest, but remember that Wikipedia isn't a collection of every detailed release of these films, so it might not be wise to mention every individual release. Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've found a reliable source for Arrow Video's Blu-ray release of Warning from Space:

www.diabloikdvd.com/product/warning-from-space-arrow-us-blu-ray/

Please see what you can do with this, if anything.Mcfoureyes (talk) 14:25, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you want to do with this. Mcfoureyes. Also, I'd read up on WP:RS and such on finding reliable sources. Generally speaking, sites which are just shops are not really going to win many people over on being Reliable Sources. Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:35, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to put it in the article, but it seems I can't. The only other possibility I could find was the listing of the film on Arrow Video's website. Would that count as reliable - right from the source itself?Mcfoureyes (talk) 17:46, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've done some googling and added a source. Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Violent City

Hey there - are you able to add any info from Curti's book on Italian crime movies to Violent City, especially with regard to the original casting choices and any other info he provides? I've added a few things from him, but I'm limited by what's presented on the Preview of the book since I don't own it. PatTheMoron (talk) 07:26, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I'm about to head to work but I'll see if there's anything I can add tonight. Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:57, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Stompshoutscream.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stompshoutscream.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request

As one of the few Acid house heads on wiki, would appreciate if you could cast a weary eye on Shoom, which am intending to take to FAC in a few weeks. Brutal comments welcome. Ceoil (talk) 17:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ceoil:, I gave it some quick lookover and outside some mild re-organization, i think it looks good. I'll try to take a quick look at the sources later. Andrzejbanas (talk) 23:31, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Necronomicon-poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Necronomicon-poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Invisible Man (1933 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roxy Theatre.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bella Morte albums

A tag has been placed on Category:Bella Morte albums requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:50, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Black Sunday (1960 film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Black Sunday (1960 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:20, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hanna-d-la-ragazza-del-vondel-park-italian-movie-poster-md.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hanna-d-la-ragazza-del-vondel-park-italian-movie-poster-md.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Black Sunday (1960 film)

The article Black Sunday (1960 film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Black Sunday (1960 film) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:20, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Black Sunday (1960 film)

The article Black Sunday (1960 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Black Sunday (1960 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:21, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1990: The Bronx Warriors, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Starburst.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Universal Classic Monsters

The Dark Universe was attempted and was scrapped due to the negative reception of the Mummy. Universal Classic Monsters was the name of franchise. Don't revert. The Dark Universe page became a draft because it was scrapped.

Red Mask X — Preceding unsigned comment added by Red Mask X (talk • contribs) 17:27, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you are trying to say. What rule is being broken and what do you actively want restored? You seem to be just revering a section by adding several unsourced content that goes against a talk page consensus. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:33, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.-Andrzejbanas I am putting on an edit warring for you now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Red Mask X (talk • contribs) 17:41, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Red Mask X:, thanks, i've posted a follow-up. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:49, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:The Fades albums

A tag has been placed on Category:The Fades albums requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:02, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Everhood moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Everhood, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. VAXIDICAE💉 22:13, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Everhood has been accepted

Everhood, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 10:09, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Invisible Man (1933 film)

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article The Invisible Man (1933 film) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

There are a couple of things that need your attention.

In the Pre-roduction section this sentence appears: By June 6, John L. Balderston, whose name had appeared in the credits of Dracula and Frankenstein, submitted a screenplay for The Invisible Man in collaboration with the film's new director John L. Balderston. Obviously the new director is not Balderston. Do you know who it was?

In the Reception section this quote appears: In Kim Newman and James Marriott's book The Definitive Guide to Horror Movies (2006), Marriott praised the film as "a perfectly judged marriage of menace and comedy, anchored by superlative special special effects and a bravura performance from Rains". Are you able to check the source to confirm that "special" should appear twice?

Those are the only issues I found.

Best of luck with the GAN. Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:27, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I've fixed these issues. Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:19, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Invisible Man (1933 film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Invisible Man (1933 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:00, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Invisible Man (1933 film)

The article The Invisible Man (1933 film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Invisible Man (1933 film) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:00, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Invisible Man (1933 film)

Congrats dude! The article you were working on, The Invisible Man (1933 film), has passed the GA-criteria, becoming a good article on April 8, 2021.

Great job on the improvements! For you're hard work, I award you this image of a cute dog. Enjoy!

Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:31, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What a cute dog! Thank you! Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:50, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Invisible Man (1933 film)

The article The Invisible Man (1933 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Invisible Man (1933 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:41, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Uninvited (1944 film)

Hello, Andrzejbanas. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for The Uninvited (1944 film) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 05:55, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Uninvited (1944 film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Uninvited (1944 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:00, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Uninvited (1944 film)

The article The Uninvited (1944 film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Uninvited (1944 film) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:40, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Uninvited (1944 film)

The article The Uninvited (1944 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Uninvited (1944 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:41, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Son of Dracula (1943 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Friday.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Blackfridayposter.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Blackfridayposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zombie Nightmare

Will you be making a follow-up on your review here? GamerPro64 01:19, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I answered the rest of your comments. GamerPro64 19:01, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:B5-daimajin-xl.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:B5-daimajin-xl.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dtest sndtrk.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dtest sndtrk.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Black Moon (1934 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Holt.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "Charge of the Monsters" - Airdate: April 2, 1971
"Takkong's Great Revenge" - Airdate: April 9, 1971
"Operation Monster Rainbow" - Airdate: May 14, 1971
"SOS Monster Island" - May 29, 1971
"The Five Ultra Pledges" - Airdate: March 31, 1971

[a]