Jump to content

User talk:Ammarpad/Archive 10

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 15

The Bugle: Issue CLII, December 2018

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:34, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

17:33, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018

Hello Ammarpad,

Reviewer of the Year

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.

Thanks are also extended for their work to JTtheOG (15,059 reviews), Boleyn (12,760 reviews), Cwmhiraeth (9,001 reviews), Semmendinger (8,440 reviews), PRehse (8,092 reviews), Arthistorian1977 (5,306 reviews), Abishe (4,153 reviews), Barkeep49 (4,016 reviews), and Elmidae (3,615 reviews).
Cwmhiraeth, Semmendinger, Barkeep49, and Elmidae have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only seven months, while Boleyn, with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.

See also the list of top 100 reviewers.

Less good news, and an appeal for some help

The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640 holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.


Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019

At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3 December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.


Training video

Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minute video was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers.


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

RollingStoneAlbum listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect RollingStoneAlbum. Since you had some involvement with the RollingStoneAlbum redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Stefan2 (talk) 22:02, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

20:34, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:2019 Pro Bowl logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2019 Pro Bowl logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Timeless Newsletter • Issue 3

Newsletter • December 2018

Welcome to the third issue of the Timeless newsletter, complete with a somewhat dubious explanation of where I've been all this time.

Somewhat dubious explanation of where I've been all this time:

I suffered a rather bad concussion in October, which knocked me pretty much completely out of commission through November, and I'm still recovering even now. One person = bus factor of one, even though it wasn't actually a bus but a very short flight of stairs.

Updates:

  • Random bugs have been fixed. More bugs have been found. For a full list of horrors, see the workboard.
  • Implementing themes (T131991: the dark/night mode and winter variants of the skin) has proven far more complicated than initially thought, lacking either the extension, or preferably, some core support for this functionality. Thus:
    • I have submitted a Request for Comment proposing to merge Extension:Theme into core - this will enable skins to specify style variants as distinct options for users to select in their preferences by letting the skin specify the styles separately for each, a much neater way of implementing this than some of the existing hacks.
    • Jack Phoenix has already submitted a patch to do this. We simply need the buy-in and consensus to merge it, and to resolve whatever issues may arise from this wider review.

Comments on the RfC (MediaWiki wiki RfC page, task) or bugs, or further reports, are always appreciated.

Until next time, hopefully with no further injuries,

-— Isarra 22:35, 20 December 2018 (UTC)


Yo Ho Ho

ϢereSpielChequers 13:10, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. Happy Holidays. –Ammarpad (talk) 09:12, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Ammarpad, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,

Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 21:45, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Thank you, Dreamy Jazz. Happy Holidays. –Ammarpad (talk) 06:55, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2018

Mail call

You've got some email. Or if you'd prefer, just look at my last edit in my contributions... WormTT(talk) 21:40, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Ammarpad!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Precious

Nigeria and beyond

Thank you for quality articles such as Nigerian Academy of Letters, BBC Hausa, Farooq Kperogi and 2018 London Marathon, for creating and maintaining {{Nigeria Prize for Literature}}, for support at the Teahouse, and for "Everything meaningful is welcome. "- na gode, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:59, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Greetings.

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Hope the new year will bring more friendly debates and collaboration for us. Best wishes. Cheers --DBigXray 15:31, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Ammarpad!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year!

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

A Barnstar for You

The Original Barnstar
Thanks for your many contributions to the project and for stepping up at RfA. While that didn't go as well as hoped, your work here is greatly appreciated. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:38, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks

Now feels like a good time to thank you for all you do for Wikipedia. I am sure the RfA was disappointing but I hope you are able to take some positives from it and continue the work of improving freely available knowledge to the world. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 19:02, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you @Barkeep49:. –Ammarpad (talk) 03:50, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLIII, January 2019

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Nigerian Civil War/Biafran War

Thought I'd let you know I've reopened the discussion, this time according to the book. I apologize of getting ahead of myself yesterday. As I said before, I am not particularly opinionated on this issue, and you just might change my mind. Cheers! Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 19:17, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, I will comment over there. –Ammarpad (talk) 05:24, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Just some thoughts

Wanted you to know that I will continue to support you in any future bid for adminship. I withdrew from my RfA for different reasons, and you stuck it out quite a bit longer than I did. The only reason I ran was because two awesome people wanted me to run. Couldn't really think of a good reason to be an admin, since anytime I need the tools, there is always a helpful admin to make the edits for me. Since my RfA I've been on a roller coaster of yes or no wanting to be an admin, and I think the only good and solid reason for wanting to be an admin is to know that you have the trust of the community, well perhaps a couple hundred of them, anyway. This essay helped me and might you also. Happy New Year and always yours... Paine Ellsworth, ed.  put'r there  03:04, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you, Paine Ellsworth, for the kind words and support. Happy New Year to you too. –Ammarpad (talk) 08:39, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
I for one think this whole process has evolved into a bunch of BS over the last few years, and you are an unfortunate victim. There is no such thing as a perfect candidate, and the nitpickers will dredge up whatever bogus negatives they can find and then it will snowball against an RFA candidate. We are losing admins faster than we are gaining them, and good people like you are getting rejected. It is truly a broken system. --rogerd (talk) 22:03, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Ammarpad, I meant to come earlier to tell you that I hope you take some time, consider the message the Opposers were sending, work on some of your weaker areas (and we all have them!) and have a second RfA. Quite a few of our current admins had two or even three RfAs before they passed. I've been through the RfA meat-grinder, too, and going through it a second time probably feels like the last thing you want to put yourself through. I know I wanted to withdraw halfway through my RfA when things weren't going well but I saw all of the people supporting me and decided to wait it through. Still, the people opposing me had some good points and even though I passed, I've changed some of my behavior.
I don't have any doubt you would make a good admin so I hope you continue to do good work, work on a couple areas of improvement and throw your hat in the ring again when the time feels right. You had a lot of support and I'm sure those editors will show up and support you again. Cheers! Liz Read! Talk! 05:55, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Thank you guys, @Liz and Rogerd: I appreciate your messages, and I can assure you that I am not dispirited, not even thought of something close to that. To me, I have already moved ahead and I am contented with where I am for now. Best wishes to you all. –Ammarpad (talk) 10:35, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

18:29, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Paweł Adamowicz

On 14 January 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Paweł Adamowicz, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:18, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Notification of AFD

Hiya, you were previously involved with the article KC International Airlines. Just wanted to know I had nominated the article for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KC International Airlines (2nd nomination). Please voice your opinions there. See below. Notified the wrong user. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 16:19, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

@Tyw7: Please explain the involvement I had with the page. I did not create it and also never edited it. I am not even aware of its existence until now. –Ammarpad (talk) 17:42, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Ammarpad, whoops. I saw you at User_talk:Kwanefung and thought you had nominated the article for speedy deletion. You were kinda sandwiched between two editors who had PROD and SPEEDY the KC Airlines article. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 17:45, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
It's all right. –Ammarpad (talk) 19:17, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

AfroCine: Thank You!

Greetings!

The Months of African Cinema Global Edit-a-thon was concluded on 30 November 2018, and we've had amazing results. Over 570 articles were created across 8 language-Wikipedias. 7 in-person gatherings of Wikipedians were organized across different parts of the world.

All our winners have been recognized and you can check the complete list here.

For a pilot event, all our expectations were surpassed and we have you to thank for that. Thank you so much for being part of this global event! Thank you for helping to fix African content gaps on Wikipedia! We hope to see more of your participation in future AfroCine events and activities. Please remember to signup on the main WikiProject participants page, in order to get updated with these activities.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:50, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

20:34, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Template:Shortdescription listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Shortdescription. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Shortdescription redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 20:09, 24 January 2019 (UTC) Redirects cause problems with the short description editing gadget. Cheers · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 18:34, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 2

18:15, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:2019 Pro Bowl logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2019 Pro Bowl logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:22, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2019

GOCE 2018 Annual Report

Guild of Copy Editors 2018 Annual Report

Our 2018 Annual Report is now ready for review.

Highlights:

  • Overview of Backlog-reduction progress;
  • Summary of Drives, Blitzes, and the Requests page;
  • Membership news and results of elections;
  • Annual leaderboard;
  • Plans for 2019.
– Your project coordinators: Miniapolis, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, Reidgreg and Tdslk.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.


MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

17:11, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLIV, February 2019

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:19, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

18:45, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

8th ISCB Wikipedia Competition: a reminder

Growth team updates #5

Welcome to the fifth newsletter for the new Growth team!  

The Growth team's objective is to work on software changes that help retain new contributors in mid-size Wikimedia projects.

New projects for discussion

We began the "Personalized first day" project with the welcome survey so that we could gather information about what newcomers are trying to accomplish. The next step is to use that information to create experiences that help the newcomers accomplish their goal – actually personalizing their first day. We asked for community thoughts in the previous newsletter, and after discussing with community members and amongst our team, we are now planning two projects as next steps: "engagement emails" and "newcomer homepage".

  • Engagement emails: this project was first discussed positively by community members here back in September 2018, and the team how has bandwidth to pursue it. The idea is that newcomers who leave the wiki don't get encouraged to return to the wiki and edit. We can engage them through emails that send them the specific information they need to be successful – such as contact from a mentor, the impact of their edits, or task recommendations. Please read over the project page, and comment on its discussion page with any ideas, questions, or concerns. Do you think this is a good idea? Where could we go wrong?
  • Newcomer homepage: we developed the idea for this project after analyzing the data from the welcome survey and EditorJourney datasets. We saw that many newcomers seem to be looking for a place to get started – a place that collects their past work, options for future work, and ways to learn more. We can build this place, and it can connect to the engagement emails. The content of both could be guided by what newcomers say they need during their welcome survey, and contain things like contact from a mentor, impact of their edits, or task recommendations. Please read over the project page, and comment on its discussion page with any ideas, questions, or concerns. Do you think this is a good idea? Where could we go wrong?

Initial reports on newcomer activity

We have published initial reports on each of the team's first two projects. These reports give the basic numbers from each project, and there are many more questions we will continue to answer in future reports. We're excited about these initial findings. They have already helped us define and design parts of our future projects.

  • Welcome survey: the initial report on welcome survey responses is available here. Some of the main findings:
    • Most users respond to the survey, giving it high response rates of 67% and 62% in Czech and Korean Wikipedias, respectively.
    • The survey does not cause newcomers to be less likely to edit.
    • The most common reason for creating an account in Korean Wikipedia is to read articles—not for editing—with 29% of Korean users giving that responses.
    • Large numbers of respondents said they are interested in being contacted to get help with editing: 36% in Czech and 53% in Korean.
  • Understanding first day: the initial report on what newcomers do on their first day is available here. Some of the main findings:
    • Large numbers of users view help or policy pages on their first day: 42% in Czech and 28% in Korean.
    • Large numbers of users view their own User or User Talk page on their first day: 34% in Czech and 39% in Korean.
    • A majority of new users open an editor on their first day – but about a quarter of them do not go on to save an edit during that time.

Help panel deployment

The help panel was deployed in Czech and Korean Wikipedias on January 10. Over the past four weeks:

  • About 400 newcomers in each wiki have seen the help panel button.
  • About 20% of them open up the help panel.
  • About 50% of those who open it up click on one of the links.
  • About 5% of Czech users ask questions, and about 1% of Korean users ask questions.

We think that the 20% open rate and 50% click rate are strong numbers, showing that a lot of people are looking for help, and many want to help themselves by looking at help pages. The somewhat lower numbers of asking questions (especially in Korean Wikipedia) has caused us to consider new features to allow people to help themselves. We're going to be adding a search bar to the help panel next, which will allow users to type a search that only looks for pages in the Help and Wikipedia namespaces.

How to create a good feedback page?

What is the way to built a good help page? What blocks you when writing an help page? Your replies will help to create better help contents to newcomers, that would be used on Help panel.

Growth team's newsletter prepared by the Growth team and posted by bot, 14:15, 13 February 2019 (UTC) • Give feedbackSubscribe or unsubscribe.

23:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Talk to us about talking

Trizek (WMF) 15:08, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

21:16, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 3

You changed my edits, why?

Hey man, I saw that you reverted my edits earlier; however, I don't think you understand that my edits were truthful and agreed upon within this high school community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tupac lives in cuba (talkcontribs) 16:23, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

I explained why on your talkpage, even before you ask. Wikipedia has its own standard and does not follow what individual communities agreed upon, besides the fact that you're just making up this claim. When did the community resolved to call the town "trashy"? –Ammarpad (talk) 16:32, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

16:38, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLV, March 2019

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:00, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

19:29, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2010–2017 Toronto serial homicides. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.17

Hello Ammarpad,

News
Discussions of interest
  • Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
  • {{db-blankdraft}} was merged into G13 (Discussion)
  • A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
  • There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.
Reminders
  • NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.
NPP Tools Report
  • Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
  • copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
  • The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828
Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.


Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Growth team updates #6

18:19, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

19:43, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

March GOCE newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors March 2019 Newsletter

Hello and welcome to the March newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since December 2018. All being well, we're planning to issue these quarterly in 2019, balancing the need to communicate widely with the avoidance of filling up talk pages. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below.

January Drive: Thanks to everyone for the splendid work in January's Backlog Elimination Drive. We removed copyedit tags from all of the articles tagged in our original target months of June, July and August 2018, and by 24 January we ran out of articles. After adding September, we finished the month with 8 target articles remaining and 842 left in the backlog. GOCE copyeditors also completed 48 requests for copyedit in January. Of the 31 people who signed up for this drive, 24 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Blitz: Thanks to everyone who participated in the February Blitz. Of the 15 people who signed up, 13 copyedited at least one article. Participants claimed 32 copyedits, including 15 requests. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Progress report: As of 23:39, 18 March 2019 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have completed 108 requests since 1 January and the backlog stands at 851 articles.

March Drive: The month-long March drive is now underway; the target months are October and November 2018. Awards will be given to everyone who copyedits at least one article from the backlog. Sign up here!

Election reminder: It may only be March but don't forget our mid-year Election of Coordinators opens for nominations on 1 June. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Miniapolis, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, Reidgreg and Tdslk.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Christchurch mosque shootings. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (academics). Legobot (talk) 04:31, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

ITN

Please stop your disruptive closures. As stated in my edit summary, there is nothing that states that the posting should be closed but enough to say it should remain open. At the very least, other users should be given time to respond to the posting instead of it being posted and closed/archived overnight. Please explain how your actions adhere to Wikipedia:In the news/Administrator instructions#ITN/C. Thank you. Nihlus 06:56, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Also, please stop edit warring. Nihlus 07:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
There was overwhelming consensus to post this and it was posted; that's the end of the issue as per as ITN/C is concerned. You should respect the consensus formed even though you don't like it. I also told you to air your grievance at the right place, i.e either at WP:ERRORS or by opening a new nomination for pulling. And please... stop grandstanding, edit inline with consensus is not disruptive, but editing to subvert consensus certainly is.– Ammarpad (talk) 07:10, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Please explain how your actions adhere to Wikipedia:In the news/Administrator instructions#ITN/C, specifically the part that I keep posting: Posted nominations generally are not closed so that the nomination can be used as a workspace for an item (beyond the scope of WP:ERRORS) or if there is a possibility of additional voters later requesting that the item be pulled. Thanks. (Also, there is hardly overwhelming consensus to post it as a blurb. I see a lot of support for ongoing.) Nihlus 07:17, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
I reopened the discussion, Nihlus. I also responded on the ITN talkpage. Thanks. – Ammarpad (talk) 10:14, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

18:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Template namespace. Legobot (talk) 04:34, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 4

The Signpost: 31 March 2019

Please comment on Talk:Companion (Doctor Who)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Companion (Doctor Who). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

TV episode titles

For disptitle usage in proper TV episode title disambiguation, please see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Titles#Italicizing Wikipedia article titles. — Wyliepedia @ 10:08, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

When I removed it, I did so to remove the page from this error category not because of the italic title. Also FYI, use of the template {{DISPLAYTITLE}} is discouraged in favor of the magicword {{DISPLAYTITLE:pagetitle}}. So I changed it to use the magicword.– Ammarpad (talk) 10:59, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

User access level question

Hi Ammarpad. I have a quick question you may be able to answer given your recent edit to Wikipedia:User access levels. I do not have the "page mover" user right but until the last few days have been able to move categories. Do you know if this is now something that is restricted to this user group? Thanks. Jevansen (talk) 01:57, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

@Jevansen: Yes, previously all registered user could move category pages, this was recently changed after this discusssion. It was deployed here on April 3. – Ammarpad (talk) 05:32, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Ok that explains it. Thanks a lot. Jevansen (talk) 06:08, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLVI, April 2019

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:00, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

8th ISCB Wikipedia Competition: entries closing soon!

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy/Proposed amendment (April 2019). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Voodoo Doughnut

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Voodoo Doughnut. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

A welcome message of yours

Did you noticed that you welcomed a Holocaust denier?[37] Doug Weller talk 05:23, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

@Doug Weller: Well, no. I welcomed them because they asked for help about citation error at the Teahouse which I helped them resolve. And It seems they did the edit you're referring a day after I welcomed them; so there's no way for me to guess, in advance, what they didn't commit at the time of welcoming. – Ammarpad (talk Ammarpad) 05:40, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
I'm sure you must have missed it, but the edit I'm talking about left their user page looking like this:[38] "Hello this is my user page, don't know how you found it but dont expect much as im not very great at making wiki articles. The Holocaust is a lie; The Leuchter Reports http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/16-tlr.pdf" - unless I'm reading it wrong.Doug Weller talk 07:30, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Indeed I had not seen that. Thanks. – Ammarpad (talk) 11:10, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

RfC discussion

I think you may have misunderstood. The RfC at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ethnic groups is specifically about reversing this guideline which resulted from this RfC. This is a discussion about a guideline. --T*U (talk) 21:33, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

You're right @T*U: so I reverted. I of course misunderstood. I found that people are just plastering "policy" to any random rfc which led to bloating of this list and then cause unnecessary notifications to people who are not interested in such topics. But I should have check that more. Thanks for the clarification. – Ammarpad (talk) 05:24, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:User access levels. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 27 April 2019 (UTC)