User talk:Alex R. (Toronto)

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Alex_R._(Toronto).

Referring to Toronto subway lines

I have started a discussion on this issue at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Toronto#Referring_to_Toronto_subway_lines. I invite your comments. until this issue has been resolved, please refrain from changing references in the text from lines names to numbers. Thanks. Ground Zero | t 19:10, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 510 Spadina may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

that issues a P-O-P receipt, as operators in the new vehicles now sit in a fully enclosed cab (similar to those used on the new [[Toronto Rocket]] subway and [[Scarborough RT|Line 3, Scarborough
used on the new [[Toronto Rocket]] subway and [[Scarborough RT|Line 3, Scarborough RT]] trains]] meaning they are no longer exposed to the public unlike the older streetcars. for riders who

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:03, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Writing sentences

Alex, when you string together a whole bunch of information using bracketed phrases, and comma splices, and so on, you diminsh the quality of the article. Doing this makes it harder to read. Please stop doing it. here is an example of a mess that you created. I know that you mean well and want to contribute, but you must understand that you are doing damage to these articles. You must start breaking up these run-on sentences into separate sentences. I have been cleaning up after you for a long time now, and you still keep doing this. If you ignore this request, you can expect that I will start commenting your contributions out so that they do not degrade the article. Please fix the 509 article as a signal that you understand and will start trying harder. Thank you. Ground Zero | t 16:00, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted the edits you just restored to the 509 Harbourfront article in oreder to protect the article's quality. Your edits do not met Wikipedia standards. Please fix your edits instead of engaging in an edit war. Ground Zero | t 16:01, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]