Jump to content

User talk:Alex Bakharev/Archive27

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Signpost: 27 June 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 4 July 2011

[edit]

Article importance on Russia task force pages

[edit]

Hello Alex! Since you are experienced in botovodstvo, could you help us with the issue discussed here? GreyHood Talk 15:21, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RUS

[edit]

Note that the page has recently been split. Please, consider to use precise shortcuts. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 08:58, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Meller Allo.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Meller Allo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 18:22, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Merab mamardashvili.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Merab mamardashvili.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 18:39, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 July 2011

[edit]

Non-free rationale for File:Kim Scott.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kim Scott.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 18:14, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zinaida Reich DYK

[edit]

Hi, Alex. I reviewed your article and made copy editing changes for the English. Also suggested a slight modification to your second suggested DYK hook - add that she was an actress and delete the "72 years" - if it were a rounder number, like 75 or 100, it might be more powerful. Best wishes Parkwells (talk) 21:15, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kim Scott.jpg

[edit]

Sorry, I'm not convinced- the cover would be fine on an article about the book, but covers are rarely needed in articles about the authors. Nor could this serve as an identifying image, as it would be replaceable with a free alternative. Is there some reason that this particular cover is important and needs to be shown? J Milburn (talk) 23:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes

[edit]

Hi.

It appears you applied 'Pending Changes' protection to the article Nasir al-Din al-Tusi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) on 7 July [1]

Per the concluded RFC, there is currently no consensus to use that form of protection on any articles (c/f WP:PCPP).

Following a lot of discussion, no agreement could be formed for use of Pending Changes protection at this present time.

Currently, that is the only article on enwiki using 'PC protection'.

Therefore, could you please remove the PC-protection, and - if appropriate - feel free to apply semi-protection as may be necessary.

Best,  Chzz  ►  00:28, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.  Chzz  ►  03:08, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 July 2011

[edit]


Melbourne meetup this Saturday

[edit]
Melbourne Meetup
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup at North Melbourne this Saturday (23 July). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 16 Hope to see you there! JVbot (talk) 04:57, 20 July 2011 (UTC) (this automated message was delivered to all users at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne/Participants)[reply]

DYK for Zinaida Reich

[edit]

Materialscientist (talk) 16:02, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tsarina Golden Palace

[edit]

Hello Alex. The article on Tsarina Golden Palace is tagged for copyediting and I am about to do this. The Kremlin web site calls it the "Golden Tsarina's Chamber". The article itself uses the phrase "Tsarina's Golden Chamber", which I think might be better because it's the chamber rather than the tsarina that is golden :)

In the history, I see that the article started its life with the title "The Tsarina's Golden Chamber", and that you moved it to its present tile because of MOS. I agree with this, at least because MOS says that article titles should not begin with "the". But I wonder if it might be good to move it to "Tsarina's Golden Chamber" (without "the" at the start). I would like to do this, but what is your view, please? --Stfg (talk) 08:45, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • I actually don't sure about the correct name for the article. Russian word palata (палата, the same root as in English word palace) might mean both a building (palace) or a room (chamber). The article is about the building that is mostly notable because of the chamber. Indeed that is the chamber that is golden not the building but we are talking not only about the chamber but also about the outside building. It is confusing. If we could translate the word palata the way to keep the ambiguity it will be great. I will copy the section on the talk page of the article, might be somebody could give better arguments either way. I am personally lean for the name with the word palace but I an not to revert you if you move to the name with the word chamber Alex Bakharev (talk) 09:24, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks. I've replied on the article talk page. By the way, by editing while the {{GOCEinuse}} box was on the page, you created an edit conflict. However, no problem, as I have restored the sentence you inserted. --Stfg (talk) 09:56, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 July 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 01 August 2011

[edit]

Boris Berezovsky - BLPN

[edit]

Hi - I think you are aware but just in case - Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Boris_Berezovsky_.28businessman.29 - please comment thanks - Off2riorob (talk) 20:33, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 08 August 2011

[edit]

File permission problem with File:Cherepanov Engine.JPG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Cherepanov Engine.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 04:46, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Korolev Kurchatov Keldysh.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Korolev Kurchatov Keldysh.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:06, 13 August 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Korin russia walking away.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Korin russia walking away.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:06, 13 August 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Korin Beggar.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Korin Beggar.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:06, 13 August 2011 (UTC) [reply]

The Signpost: 15 August 2011

[edit]


Renaming the article

[edit]
  • Hi,

Please help me. I have made en error in naming my article about a personality. How to correct it?--Gary4bendov (talk) 22:21, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 August 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 29 August 2011

[edit]

Renaming an image

[edit]

Hello Alex!

I write to you as you are both an admin and a member of Eastern Orthodoxy project. Could you please give me a piece of advice. I'm new to Wikipedia but am striving to improve some articles and images on Orthodoxy (I'm Orthodox, my name is Elijah). Correcting both text and graphics for different articles, I've found some images have ugly names. The question is (pardon me for my stupidity I haven't manage to understand it from wiki documentation) how to rename an image. In fact I have some suspicion the point is I'm not "trusted user" yet. So the second question is - how can anyone become trusted (I believe you surely know this being yourself not only trusted but an admin). Regards, B7elijah (talk) 21:10, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 05 September 2011

[edit]

Andreas von Stierland (in russian Вельвен, Андреас фон)

[edit]

Hello Alex Bakharev. Please help translate this article could to English. I translated, but know nothing Russian language. Please help me. The article is short. a greetings--Puedoeditar (talk) 18:54, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 September 2011

[edit]

Kirill Formanchuk

[edit]

Алекс! Мы давно не общались, но сейчас надо. В вашем языковом разделе есть статья ru:Форманчук, Кирилл Викторович, которая в нашем разделе стоит на удалении. В ру-ВП многиеподобные статьи о мелких региональных политиках быстро сносятся. Почему так в ен-ВП, хотя статья о Кате Гордон в своё время была быстро удалена. Прошу вас внимательно присмотреться к этой статье и обсудить проблему с другими участниками. В нашем разделе сейчас наблюдается наплыв всякого рода виртуалов. Скорее всего связано с грядущими выборами президента и госдумы. --Torin (talk) 07:16, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • The article refers to a New York Times article entirely devoted to this guy. Not that many Russian activists have similar articles, thus I think the guy is notable (or have a really good PR support). Maybe I am an inclusionist but I would rather have a biased article than no article, thus, I think the article should stay. I doubt that many voters in Yekaterinburg will be influenced by en-wiki articles one way or another. Alex Bakharev (talk) 08:09, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Понятно! Ну, я ни на чём настаиваю, но в целом его деятельность производит впечатление каких-то эскапад. --Torin (talk) 08:52, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Я стараюсь определять notability по формальным признакм. Да, герой - какой-то шут гороховый, еще и с ЕР - связан. Но, если о нем пишет NYT, то формально условия notabilty - соблюдены. Вреда от этой статьи не вижу. Пускай себе висит. Alex Bakharev (talk) 12:11, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Скажите, а качество статьи в NYT как-то учитывается? Там несколько фактических ошибок, видно, что автор просто не владеет русским языком и не очень разобрался. Так, походя написал проходную колонку из серии "Их нравы". Вот, характерный пример:

And so it was that Mr. Formanchuk became a leader of a budding movement to uphold motorists’ rights


...

Not everyone here approves of Mr. Formanchuk. The chairman of his activist group, Georgy Badyin,

Второе предложение чистая правда, Бадьин - председатель КЗПА, а первое - вранье. Форманчук тогда был весьма начинающим и в судах за него боролись другие, тот же Бадьин. Никакой он не лидер был, да и не стал им потом. Локально известен своей клоунадой и не более того. Могу еще ошибок автора накидать, с пруфлинками. Mir76 (talk) 14:45, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the notion that NYT article has errors would significantly affect the notability of the subject. In a way it even increases the public benefits of the wikipedia article: it is probably the only method to make English-speaking public aware of those inaccuracies. The article should represent the NYT info as well as corrections referenced to local Russian-language materials (including if necessary primary sources but not the vague "local knowledge"). Alex Bakharev (talk) 23:44, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rokhlin

[edit]

Hi,

with some delay (of just 5 years), I have responded to your remark at Talk:Vladimir_Rokhlin_(Soviet_mathematician). Probably the page is no longer in your watchlist, so I am leaving you a note here.

Sasha (talk) 04:49, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 September 2011

[edit]

Non-free rationale for File:Neznaika friends cover.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Neznaika friends cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 11:20, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A little present for ya

[edit]

Hey Sasha, howzit? Remember a while ago...well shit...probably 2 years ago now, we had a difference of opinion on whether a photo of the An-225 in flight with Buran on top would satisfy fair use, given that there are other photos out there which we could try and get a free licence? Well that was my opinion, anyway lol. Well I finally got 'em.

File:Antonov An-225 with Buran at Le Bourget 1989 Manteufel.jpg and File:Antonov An-225 with Buran at Le Bourget 1989 Manteufel-2.jpg. Yay!

I've managed to get a heap of other beauties under a free licence as well...perhaps some will look familiar to you?

File:Tupolev Tu-144 in Hannover in 1972 Manteufel.jpg - File:Aeroflot Mil V-12 (Mi-12) Groningen Airport.jpg - File:Aeroflot Tupolev Tu-144 Paris Air Show 1975 Gilliand.jpg

Just spewing that I missed the Tu-144 era. It would have been a trip to have gotten on one. Anyway, hope all is good with you as well? Russavia Let's dialogue 23:39, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 September 2011

[edit]


Ivan Poddubny

[edit]

Здравствуйте. Чем вы можете, исходя из источников, аргументировать такую свою правку? Вы точно поняли из-за чего пара участников начала вандализм преамбулы статьи в обход их содержания? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.92.176.105 (talk) 20:56, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • In this particular dif I have removed unneeded parentheses and moved a reference a few words ahead. I am not sure what you have found wrong with it. The previous edit is related to the national identification of Poddubny. This is a recurrent problem in Wiki concerning many figures who are usually identified as Russian outside Russia/Soviet Union but were born in the modern Ukraine or/and of Ukrainian ethnicity. The article does not provide sources whether he identified himself as Russian or Ukrainian, but there are references that he is from Ukrainian Cossacks aka Zaporozhizhian Cossacks. He is unlikely to ever represented Ukrainian teams but he was a member of teams of Russian Empire and Soviet Union. I have changed the article lead accordingly. I have chosen the tem Ukrainian Cossacks rather than Zaporozhizhian Cossacks because I wanted to keep the word Ukrainian that is important for some readers. Alex Bakharev (talk) 07:14, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 3 October 2011

[edit]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rtd

[edit]

Template:Rtd has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:19, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rk

[edit]

Template:Rk has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:32, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 October 2011

[edit]

Mark Kac protection

[edit]

Hi, you protected, for good reasons, the page on Mark Kac back in 2008. I don't think this protection is needed any more. Of course stuff could resurface but it looks like it has been quiet for the past 3 years or so. Can you unprotect it?  Volunteer Marek  18:06, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!  Volunteer Marek  19:53, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 October 2011

[edit]

Survey for new page patrollers

[edit]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Alex Bakharev/Archive27! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 10:56, 25 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The Signpost: 24 October 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 31 October 2011

[edit]

Hungry?

[edit]
You look hungry. Danhomer (talk) 03:30, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 7 November2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 14 November 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 21 November 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 28 November 2011

[edit]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lev Yashin.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lev Yashin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:21, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 05 December 2011

[edit]

Orphaned non-free image File:Obruchev za tainami plutona.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Obruchev za tainami plutona.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 19:17, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Polunin in Israel.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Polunin in Israel.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:27, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 December 2011

[edit]

Orphaned non-free image File:Amalrik.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Amalrik.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:51, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amalrik.jpg

[edit]

I have just rescued File:Amalrik.jpg, which you uploaded, from probable deletion on Christmas Day. Somehow it was removed from the article Andrei Amalrik and tagged with an "orphaned image" template. I had just uploaded a file with Amalrik's signature to the Commons for use in the article, so I caught the potential deletion before it took place. Both the image and the signature file are now displayed in an infobox, and I have deleted the "orphan" template from the image file page. Since you're an administrator, you can judge whether I've acted correctly. By the way, I actually met Amalrik in 1977 in Bloomington, Indiana. -- Cuppysfriend (talk) 00:21, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks a lot! The problem is that the file is claimed under "fair use" and the fair use rationale that I wrote is not very convincing. It was OK a few years ago but Wikipedia seems to significantly raise the requirements for fair use since then. I do believe that the fair use claim is valid but it will be difficult to argue if somebody would put it to deletion. Do you by any chance have an Amalrik photo with your copyright that you can release as GFDL or Creative Commons? Or may be you know an Amalrik photo with a story behind it so the fair use claim will be of better merit? Alex Bakharev (talk) 02:25, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 December 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 26 December 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 02 January 2012

[edit]

Whitewashing of Boris Berezovsky article

[edit]

Privet! I'd appreciate if you could comment at this section http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ANI#Whitewashing_of_Boris_Berezovsky_article Thank you! 170.148.198.157 (talk) 09:20, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 09 January 2012

[edit]

Wikipedia Day Melbourne Meetup

[edit]

Hi there. Just inviting youmto the Melbourne meetup this Sunday at 11am, to celebrate our 11th anniversary. Details on that page. Hope to see you there! SteveBot (talk) 01:41, 11 January 2012 (UTC) (on behalf of Steven Zhang)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 January 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 23 January 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 30 January 2012

[edit]

Rinat Akhmetov

[edit]

Dear Alex,
I need your help at the above mentioned article. We've had long discussions with Львівське whose allegations seem to insinuate reputation of Rinat Akhmetov, who is a living public person; recently I have thoroughly reviewed and restructured the article Rinat Akhmetov, removed poorly sourced statements having put proven facts in chronological and logical order. Львівське is now systematically restoring his version though it includes statements violating WIKI policies about Verifiability, Biographies of living persons and gossip. Kindly assist on the matter. If you are interested, I'm open for discussion at my talk page --Orekhova (talk) 08:40, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please bear in mind Orekhova is greatly exaggerating - and flat out lying - about what's going on on the page, and also seems to be too close to the subject matter.--Львівське (говорити) 02:52, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This seems to be the common problem with most articles on post-Soviet billionaires. Most of the subjects were almost certainly involved at some stage into criminal or very shady activities. There are a lot of rumors about this but no court decisions. They also are living people with a lot of money for litigation. My interpretation of the WP:BLP policy is that all unreferenced negative info should go, all notable allegations should stay but be presented as allegations even if all the authors 100% believe the allegations are true (unless there are court decisions and no doubts about political motivations behind them). If there are some retraction of allegations they must be presented as well for the balanced view. If allegations and retractions of a relatively minor fact take to much space in the article they should go to a separate article. Not notable allegations (found only in obscure sources) should be removed. These are my common principles that I am trying to apply for all those articles. I am not familiar with Akhmetov's biography but I would apply similar principles there Alex Bakharev (talk) 04:50, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds reasonable--Львівське (говорити) 05:25, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 06 February 2012

[edit]


MSU Interview

[edit]

Dear Alex Bakharev,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community HERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.


So a few things about the interviews:

  • Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
  • Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
  • All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
  • All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
  • The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.


Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name HERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) 04:13, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February Melbourne Meetup

[edit]

Hi All. Just letting you know that we have another meetup planned for Melbourne, on Sunday, 26th February at 11am. More details can be found at the meetup page. Pizza will be provided. Look forward to seeing all of you there :-) SteveBot (talk) 22:47, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 13 February 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 20 February 2012

[edit]

Ichthus: January 2012

[edit]

ICHTHUS

January 2012
Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions and subscriptions contact the Newsroom

The Signpost: 27 February 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 05 March 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 12 March 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 19 March 2012

[edit]

Melbourne meetup

[edit]

Hey all, just a reminder that there's a meetup tomorrow at 11am in North Melbourne. There are more details at the meetup page. Hope to see you tomorrow! SteveBot (talk) 03:39, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 March 2012

[edit]

Invitation to events: bot, template, and Gadget makers wanted

[edit]

I thought you might want to know about some upcoming events where you can learn more about MediaWiki customization and development, extending functionality with JavaScript, the future of ResourceLoader and Gadgets, the new Lua templating system, how to best use the web API for bots, and various upcoming features and changes. We'd love to have power users, bot maintainers and writers, and template makers at these events so we can all learn from each other and chat about what needs doing.

Check out the the Berlin hackathon in June, the developers' days preceding Wikimania in July in Washington, DC, and our other events.

You can register now for the Berlin event and if you need financial help or visa help, just mention that in the registration form.

Best wishes! - Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation's Volunteer Development Coordinator. Please reply on my talk page, here or at mediawiki.org. Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation Volunteer Development Coordinator 13:36, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 02 April 2012

[edit]

Dispute resolution survey

[edit]

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite

Hello Alex Bakharev. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.

Please click HERE to participate.
Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.

You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 01:28, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link in article 'National Bolshevik Party'

[edit]

Hi. I tried to fix the dead links in 'National Bolshevik Party', but there was one that I couldn't fix. I marked it with {{Dead link}}. Can you help fix the last dead link?


Dead: http://gzt.ru/incident/2007/03/12/183011.html

  • You added this in February 2009.
  • I tried to load this link on 15 March, 17 March, 19 March and today, but it never worked.
  • I looked in The Wayback Machine and WebCite but I couldn't find a suitable replacement.

Please take a look at that article and fix what you can. Thank you!


PS- you can opt-out of these notifications by adding {{Bots |deny=BlevintronBot}} to your user page or user talk page. BlevintronBot (talk) 07:33, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 09 April 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 16 April 2012

[edit]

Wikipedia Stories Project

[edit]

Hi!

My name is Victor and I'm a storyteller with the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit organization that supports Wikipedia. I'm chronicling the inspiring stories of the Wikipedia community around the world, including those from readers, editors, and donors. Stories are absolutely essential for any non-profit to persuade people to support the cause, and we know the vast network of people who make and use Wikipedia have so much to share.

I'm scouring user pages looking for inspiring, motivating and interesting stories of how Wikipedia has affected the lives of people. I'm asking questions like "How has Wikipedia changed your life?", "What's the most interesting story you have about Wikipedia?" and "Has Wikipedia ever surprised you?"

Last year, we used the annual fundraiser as a way to show the world who it is who actually writes Wikipedia. We featured editors from Brazil, Ukraine, Argentina, Saudi Arabia, Kenya, India, United States and England. This campaign was a huge success, resulting in the most financially successful fundraising campaign ever. It was also a campaign that stayed true to the spirit of Wikipedia, educating the public that this free top-5 website is created by volunteers like you and I.

This year we want to highlight more Russian-language Wikipedia editors, so I am in the process of planning a trip to Russia to interview editors.

If you or someone you know (or have heard about) has been positively affected by Wikipedia, or have something interesting to say about Wikipedia I'd very much like to hear about it!

Please let me know if you're inclined to take part in the Wikipedia Stories Project, or if you know someone else with whom I should speak.

Of course, if you have any questions or concerns, please ask! I will answer as soon as I can. I apologize for any poor translation of this letter, I am using Google-translate. I hope it makes you laugh :)

Thank you for your time,

Victor Grigas

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Victorgrigas

vgrigas@wikimedia.org


__________________________________

Привет!

Меня зовут Виктор, и я рассказчик с Wikimedia Foundation, некоммерческая организация, которая поддерживает Википедию. Я хроник вдохновляющих историй сообщества Википедии по всему миру, в том числе и читателей, редакторов и доноров. Истории совершенно необходимы для любой некоммерческой органицации, чтобы убедить людей поддержывать наш проект, и мы знаем, что у людей, которые строют и используют Википедии есть много, что рассказать!

Я ищу вдохновляющие страницы пользователей, и интересных историй о том, как Википедия влияют на жизнь людей. Я задавал вопросы вроде "Как Википедия изменила Вашу жизнь?", "Какая самая интересная история у Вас есть о Википедии?" и "Википедия ли когда-нибудь Вас удивило?"

В прошлом году мы использовали ежегодный сбор средств как способ показать миру, кто на самом деле пишет Википедия. Мы показывали редакторов из Бразилии, Украины, Аргентины, Саудовской Аравии, Кении, Индии, США и Англии. Этот метод имел огромный успех, в результате чего у нас была наиболее финансово успешная кампании по сбору средств в историе организации. Кроме того, мы остались верны духу Википедии, просвещение общественности, что это бесплатно ТОП-5 Сайт создан добровольцами, как Ви и я.

В этом году мы хотим выделить еще редакторов Википедии на русском языке, так что я нахожусь в процессе планирования поездки в Россию и интервью с редакторами.

Если Википедия положительно повлеяла на Вас или на кого-то из Ваших знакомых, или у Вас есть что-то интересное сказать о Википедии, я бы очень хотел услышать об этом!

Пожалуйста, дайте мне знать, если Ви бы хотели участвовать в проекте Истории Википедии, или если вы знаете кого-то еще, с кем я должен поговорить.

Конечно, если у Вас есть какие-либо вопросы или сомнения, пожалуйста, обращайтесь! Я отвечу, как только смогу. Извините за плохой перевод этого письма, я использую Google-перевод. Я надеюсь, что заставляет вас смеяться :)


Спасибо за Ваше время,

Victor Grigas

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Victorgrigas

vgrigas@wikimedia.org

Victor Grigas (talk) 23:40, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 April 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 30 April 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 07 May 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 14 May 2012

[edit]

Non-free rationale for File:Vasilchikov Diaries.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Vasilchikov Diaries.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:22, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Voznesenskaya-moi posmertnye prikljuchenija.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Voznesenskaya-moi posmertnye prikljuchenija.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:03, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 21 May 2012

[edit]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kryakutnoy.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kryakutnoy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:00, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 May 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 04 June 2012

[edit]

Non-free rationale for File:Smirnov-Rusetsky-1985.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Smirnov-Rusetsky-1985.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:31, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 June 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 18 June 2012

[edit]

Non-free rationale for File:Shilov Alboum.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Shilov Alboum.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:56, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Yegor Yakovlev.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Yegor Yakovlev.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:26, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Znamja.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Znamja.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:30, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 June 2012

[edit]

Non-free rationale for File:Rukhin fonar.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Rukhin fonar.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:50, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Tovstonogov.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tovstonogov.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:10, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Stus book.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Stus book.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:25, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 02 July 2012

[edit]

Non-free rationale for File:Totskoe-nuke.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Totskoe-nuke.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:59, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 09 July 2012

[edit]

July WMAU Melbourne Meetup

[edit]

Hi, At last month's June meetup we discussed the idea of setting up a Training Course at a University of the Third Age (U3A) to be held in 2013 and named Becoming a Wikipedia editor. In order to get this course up and running we are calling for volunteers to help develop the idea, and either tutor part of the course, or provide one on one help to students in the class. All local Wikipedians are welcome to discuss this at our 11am meetup to be held this Sunday on 22 July. Please add your name to the attending list at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 23. Food and beverages are provided. Cuddy Wifter (talk) 02:15, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 July 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 23 July 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 30 July 2012

[edit]

Non-free rationale for File:Romm kak v kino.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Romm kak v kino.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:21, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Senkevich-puteshestvie-99.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Senkevich-puteshestvie-99.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:40, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 06 August 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 13 August 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 20 August 2012

[edit]

Non-free rationale for File:Vjach Ivanov Rower.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Vjach Ivanov Rower.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:34, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 August 2012

[edit]

Non-free rationale for File:Totskoe-Zhukov Malyshev.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Totskoe-Zhukov Malyshev.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:29, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 03 September 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 10 September 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 17 September 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 15 October 2012

[edit]

Replaceable fair use File:Danzig self.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Danzig self.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 03:20, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 October 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 29 October 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 05 November 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 12 November 2012

[edit]

Non-free rationale for File:Russian South Pole Traverse.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Russian South Pole Traverse.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 13:56, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 November 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 26 November 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 03 December 2012

[edit]

User:Khodabandeh14

[edit]

Alex, you locked this user's talk page back in 2011. I see no basis for continuing the lock, although the user wants it (for ill-conceived reasons), and I've removed it. You weren't around to consult before doing this, but just in case you're watching from wherever you are, I thought I'd give you a heads up.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:38, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 December 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 17 December 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 24 December 2012

[edit]

Meetup invitation: Melbourne 26

[edit]

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 26. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 04:52, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Victoria)

The Signpost: 31 December 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 07 January 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 14 January 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 21 January 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 28 January 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 04 February 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 11 February 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 18 February 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 25 February 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 04 March 2013

[edit]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Burliuk Livshits.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Burliuk Livshits.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:36, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 March 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 18 March 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 25 March 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 01 April 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 08 April 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 15 April 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 22 April 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 29 April 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 06 May 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 13 May 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 20 May 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 27 May 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 05 June 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 12 June 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 19 June 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 26 June 2013

[edit]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

[edit]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 03 July 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 10 July 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 17 July 2013

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alex_Bakharev/Archive27&oldid=1168298822"