User talk:ExoQuest

A beer for you!

Hey, thanks for your message, I appreciate it. Jswhitten (talk) 01:29, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, thank you! ExoEditor 02:08, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks from the ETD team

Dear ExoEditor, today i wanted to make a new article on the EN Wikipedia, as i had on my ToDo list since January and to my surprise, it is already done! Please accept acklowledgement on my behalf and on behalf of Variable Star Section of Czech Astronomical Society. --EdmundSquirrel (talk) 10:35, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment; my pleasure! ExoEditor 21:32, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Habitable Exoplanets Page

Hi there, new Wikipedia user here! Not quite sure if this is the right place to ask, but I figured I'd give it a go regardless I was checking out the Habitable exoplanet page on Wikipedia that you had started, and on that page you had listed Kepler-1632 b as a habitable exoplanet. Could you let me know what your source for that was, because I went on a bit of a hunt to find it and came up pretty empty on sources for the planet. Thanks for your help! Zestivalfestival (talk) 03:37, 19 April 2022 (UTC)Zestival Festival[reply]

Hello. Welcome to Wikipedia. Kepler-1632 b doesn't seem to be considered potentially habitable anymore according to PHL at Arecibo.

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, ExoQuest

Thank you for creating Cool Companions on Ultrawide Orbits.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:45, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! ExoEditor 01:39, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

TonyBallioni (talk) 19:57, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, ExoQuest. Thank you for creating TOI-1452 b. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:54, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Bussard ramjet

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Bussard ramjet, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:07, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Magnetic Sail - History of Concept

Hi,

Regarding your edits on June 5 to Magnetic sail#History of concept

Not sure if what Friedman defined as "solar sailing" includes using the solar wind for magnetic or electric sails. That 1988 book is out of print, and a used copy was $54 on Amazon. Does the book describe using a magnetic field to deflect charged particles in the solar wind? That is the basic definition of a magnetic sail. If that book states this fact then it was in fact prior to Zubrin, but is an arcane reference and the citation is incomplete. Please fix the citation or else it will likely be deleted by an editor.

I looked at this further on 7/10 on I looked into this a luttle further on 7/10 at https://www.google.com/books/edition/Starsailing/iQqnAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&kptab=editions&gbpv=1&bsq=%22Solar%20wind%22 that has a searchable version of the Friedman citation. I searched on "solar wind" and found the following quote on page 17:

"The solar wind plays no part in solar sailing; it's important to understand this from the start. The solar sail operates on sunlight pressure --"

Based upon this citation I disagree with the addition of all the text you inserted. I think the proper place for a summary and citation of the 1988 Friedman book is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_sail. If you can write the summary sentence(s) I can help you make the citation conform to Wikipedia guidelines. I see that you also made an improper citation in the Bussard Ramjet article.

I also disagree with your deletion of the text summarizing the book by Dana Andrews. I believe that many sources cite Andrews/Zubrin as the first to use the term "magnetic sail."

Also, I think that the Davidson reference you added to the "Sharkfin Magnetic Sail" should be deleted - it is one of many papers that summarize Zubrin and not the most comprehensive; for example, the following is a much better summary: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329103132_Review_of_Solar_Magnetic_Sailing_Configurations_for_Space_Travel

,which is already cited in the article.

In my opinion, adding a summary of the Sharkfin magnetic sail as another topic in the section Magnetic sail#Proposed magnetic sail systems would be the appropriate place for a reference to include a short summary of Davidson with the citation.

If I don't hear back from you in a few weeks, I will make the above changes - delete Friedman, restore Anrews summary, add sentence for Sharkfin and move Davidson citation there.

Thanks!

Dmcdysan (talk) 22:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Had not seen a response from you, so I had to manually undo the changes you made. Please reply to this Talk page if you disagree.

Still reading Sharkfin paper - did not find any citations supporting or refuting Davidson in an initial search, but is on my list of things to do for Magnetic Sail page.

Thanks. Dmcdysan (talk) 21:57, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]