User talk:Albert Tachibaña

February 2022

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Saint Paul Island (Alaska), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Souliousery (talk) 06:36, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The question about replacing the template is because the data is outdated (I updated the data from 1991-2020, and the original is 10 years ago), and the previous template has a website that has expired.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Kōzu-shima, you may be blocked from editing. Kpddg ^(talk ^• ^contribs) 13:20, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kpddg:Why did you just say that my edits were "vandal"? I just replaced an equivalent template that was applied by multiple pages. In addition, these templates are all created by me. Please don't maliciously speculate on others.

In addition, next time please pay attention to the assumption of goodwill for others at all times, I hope you will carefully read about Wikipedia: Assume good faith.

Thank you!

Albert Tachibaña (talk) 13:32, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Albert Tachibaña, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Kpddg ^(talk ^• ^contribs) 14:40, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lieutenant of Melkor, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Lizzy Howell (talk) 23:28, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weather boxes

Two things. First. If you are adding weather information to an article and it is the same station don't create a second weatherbox. Just add it to the original. Second. Don't collapse the template. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Scrolling lists and collapsible content. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 04:48, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed something elese. Things like {{Nosappu weatherbox}} should be used in at least two articles. If not they will end up like Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 20#Single-use weather box templates (S–Z). CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:02, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Lieutenant of Melkor per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lieutenant of Melkor. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:04, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Albert Tachibaña (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm really not Melkor's sockpuppet, because this is a baseless malicious inference, because I now live in mainland China and Melkor is not, I hope the ban will be lifted immediately, thank you. I just saw the investigation into Melkor's sockpuppet, because the "evidence" listed by someone is very one-sided, and it is obviously very inappropriate to permanently ban the account just because the account is suspicious. This is a clear wrong case. I hereby guarantee that this account is only operated by me. At the same time, I also hope that the administrator who banned me can apologize, thank you!

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:56, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@RoySmith:I think it would be very inappropriate for you to arbitrarily judge me as a suckpuppet of Melkor and to permanently block me. I was apparently framed, and the fact that the administrators banned me in the absence of clear evidence in the investigation into this sockpuppet was a clear misleading conclusion.

I can cite 3 pieces of evidence that I'm not a Suckpuppet of Melkor.

1.First of all, I now live in Chinese mainland and I have to use a VPN to access and edit Wikipedia, and I mainly use a mirror station instead of a VPN for editing, which was introduced to me by an anonymous netizen from Chinese mainland.

2.My schedule and rest time are obviously different from Melkor, because according to Beijing time (East 8th District), it is a state of rest from 24:00 to 6:00 the next day.

3.My editorial tendencies are obviously different from Melkor's, and the main editor at the moment is about japanese cities and towns, and I will adjust the template content of Japanese city introductions and Melkor will not do this.

Wikipedia:Assume good faith @RoySmith:I'm a user from Chinese mainland, falsely accused by an unknown user, Horse Eye's Back, who is a nonchalant user. In addition, the so-called evidence provided by the sockpuppet investigation since then is very one-sided, and it is obviously not true to use some rare so-called "evidence" to determine that multiple users are the same person!

我是一个来自中国大陆的用户，被素不相识的用户Horse Eye's Back诬告，而他却是一个游手好闲的用户。另外从此的傀儡调查提供的所谓证据是非常片面的，就以一些凤毛麟角的所谓“证据”判定多个用户为同一个人的说法显然是不成立的！

In general, the presumption of innocence is an important criterion for the investigation and trial of cases, and this should be the case on Wikipedia. But the ban on my administrator is clearly a presumption of guilt, and it's not in line with Wikipedia's principle of presumed good faith.

从一般的法律上来说，无罪推定是案件调查和审判的一个重要准则，在维基百科也应该如此。但是此次封禁我的管理员显然是属于有罪推定，同时这也不符合维基百科有关假定善意的原则。

In addition, if I can unblock, I guarantee that every edit I make is an editor of benefit to Wikipedia, and I hereby solemnly promise not to destroy or abuse sockpuppets.

另外，假如我能够得到解封，我保证我的每一笔编辑均为有益于维基百科的编辑，在此本人表示郑重承诺：不破坏、不滥用傀儡。

Albert Tachibaña (talk) 04:09, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Shizhao:I was maliciously framed as Melkor's sockpuppet by an unknown troublemaker, and the administrator blocked me indefinitely, knowing that the evidence was insufficient, I just want to restore my legal rights in English Wikipedia, because of this Banning is simply wrong. Albert Tachibaña (talk) 07:28, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

@Cabayi:I need your help now. First of all, I was falsely accused of being a Suckpuppet of Melkor. In addition, the administrator permanently blocked me when he knew that the evidence was insufficient. I tried twice to contact the administrator but never got a reply. Now I'm helpless and anxious. I hope that the blockade against me will be lifted as soon as possible.

If this matter is not dealt with fairly, it will have a very negative impact on my future work life and even my personal reputation. It is inevitable that the behavior of arbitrarily blocking others with just a mischievous small report is very sloppy.

Finally, the most important thing is that I don't know this User"Lieutenant of Melkor", if you feel that there is a problem, you can ask me questions, and try to use a gentle and friendly tone, thank you!

Albert Tachibaña (talk) 11:56, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Voice of Clam:@NinjaRobotPirate:@Ferret:@Yamla:Please lift the blockade on me as soon as possible, because I was maliciously framed and framed, I am innocent, and I don't know that person. A sockpuppet falsely accusing me of being a Lieutenant of Melkor by some troublemaker is pure trouble, and it is very sloppy for the administrator to block me indefinitely without solid evidence, I just want to get my legality back on English Wikipedia rights, thank you!

Albert Tachibaña (talk) 07:46, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Climate of Fukushima City

Hello, Albert Tachibaña. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Climate of Fukushima City, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Climate of Hokkaido

Hello, Albert Tachibaña. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Climate of Hokkaido, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Climate of Hokkaido

Hello, Albert Tachibaña. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Climate of Hokkaido".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:35, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cape Sōya weatherbox

Template:Cape Sōya weatherbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:St Paul Island weatherbox

Template:St Paul Island weatherbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 10:16, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Aktogay weatherbox

Template:Aktogay weatherbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Kazakhstan weatherbox templates

A tag has been placed on Category:Kazakhstan weatherbox templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:19, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]