User talk:Airborne84/archive 10

Draft:World Conquest (game) concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:World Conquest (game), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 18:08, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:World Conquest (game)

Hello, Airborne84. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "World Conquest".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:33, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Your help desk question

Did you ever get a response to this question?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:42, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for following up @Vchimpanzee. No, but I don't need an answer any longer, so please feel free to archive it, mark resolved, or whatever is appropriate. Airborne84 (talk) 01:41, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Book Project

I'd like to discuss a book project (gaming related) with you. If you're interested, would you please get in touch via the Theme Park Press (.com) website? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diznynut (talk • contribs) 23:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Strategic Imperial Conquest

Hello, Airborne84. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Strategic Imperial Conquest, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:04, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kings & Things (play-by-mail game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page White Wolf.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Play-by-mail game, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monster Island.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Starweb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Challenge.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Starweb

Thanks for your work on Starweb. I found a link to an ICv2 article which I thought you might find useful. I put it in a refideas construct on the Talk page. I also put another older link there which had already been there, so may be you had used that one. Slimy asparagus (talk) 08:16, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks @Slimy asparagus! --Airborne84 (talk) 11:41, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Great work on this one so far. I just wanted to point out that before I first edited it in 2017 it was barely a stub[1] and as a result it was a little better in 2020 before you started on it[2] so great work on all the improvements. :) BOZ (talk) 20:31, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for chipping in BOZ. Every bit helps! Appreciate your efforts. Airborne84 (talk) 02:45, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of play-by-mail games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page White Wolf.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Schubel & Son

Hey, Airborne84. Sorry for getting around to new-page-patrolling your article so late. To make up for this, I went ahead and added the full names of the founder and the exact founding date; I also added a 'Further reading' section with a magazine article on the company. I was interested, however, in when the company was disbanded, so I may keep looking for that. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 14:54, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Family Wars

Hello, Airborne84,

Thank you for creating Family Wars.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

With just 2 refs (I'm counting the two Paper Mayhem refs as one, because a) it's from the same organisation, b) the second is a non-SIGCOV capsule review), this is borderline notable. I'm unsure how long the reviews are, if they are all significantly longer than one paragraph (see Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Reviewing instructions, Wikipedia:One hundred words, I know these two are essays, but if they are met IMHO an AfD would end in keep without much debate), please leave a note at talk page and rm the tag. Also, the further reading refs probably need to be added to the article, but many thanks for your help!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

VickKiang 03:57, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Tactical Assault Group (game)

Hello, Airborne84,

Thank you for creating Tactical Assault Group (game).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for the article! However, per WP:GNG, Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability. In this case, both of the reviews are done by the same reviewer (David Webber). If I'm missing something, or there are more refs, please add more here and remove the tag. Also ping BOZ who might be interested in improving this article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

VickKiang (talk) 23:24, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Tactical Assault Group (game) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tactical Assault Group (game), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:52, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

I disagree with your action onel5969. I made the case on the talk page that WP:NEXIST is applicable here, which is true for many of this type of article where sources are primarily in out-of-print magazines. Instead of responding on the talk page to this, you moved it to draft where others cannot see it to contribute. I don't think this made Wikipedia better. My two cents. Airborne84 (talk) 00:02, 20 October 2022 (UTC)