User talk:Aizag

Welcome!

Hello, Ai6z83xl3g, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! — Cirt (talk) 00:04, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Operation Barbarossa, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. GAB (talk) 22:09, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Milch

Hello. Yes, eventually. Udet as well. The article is basic but could be improved. Was there something specific you needed ? Dapi89 (talk) 12:03, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am guilty of starting large projects and neglecting them. Ironic since the subjects I write about have that sort of mentality ingrained. Axis and Soviet air operations can be finished off soon. I'll take a look at it. Milch will have to wait for now. The Kuban air battle was certainly important, but air forces were always subordinated to the land battle in the east—though both German and Soviet air doctrine were far broader than the exercise of their forces in war would suggest. I'm not convinced it could be treated as an independent article. I think Richthofen is more or less finished. FYI. Dapi89 (talk) 13:25, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at Hugo Sperrle. Its 99% finished. Dapi89 (talk) 19:48, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not much to be added on the trial, but yes. It is the only part unfinished. Kesselring was done by some else, and Göring. If you're interested in the navy. look at Günther Lütjens Dapi89 (talk) 07:53, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dönitz

Hello again. The article does contain some details about what he was charged with and why. Unrestricted submarine warfare was removed because of similar conduct by the US in the Pacific and as far as I can see Proffessor David Zabecki and others regard his convictions concerning the Laconia and Commando order to be unjust—but this view is not universal. I would say as far as military matters are concerned, Dönitz was justly convicted for attacks on neutral shipping within the German exclusion zones. Whether this was practical or not, it was a violation of the 1936 London treaty and as the aggressors, the exclusion zone was the creation of a criminal regime so has no legitimacy even in wartime. There will be more on Nuremberg. But not much more. I intend to add information on the navy's use of slave labour and alleged involvement in transporting Jews around the Baltic, which relates to the Holocaust. Dapi89 (talk) 20:11, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. No it is not complete. It needs to be revised and rewritten in some places. I have not added any of the above yet. Dapi89 (talk) 17:37, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]