User talk:Мастер теней

Welcome! Hello, Мастер теней, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 12:29, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AWB Task

The task you requested has been completed. Regards, Alan16 (talk) 12:00, 28 July 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Thank You. Advisor^{speak en-2} 12:53, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arctic Cape

This cape does not exist. The northernmost cape called Cape Molotov (Russian: мыс Молотова) [1]. Advisor^{speak en-2} 05:54, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. You may have a naming issue, but that's not a reason to delete nor is it for discussion at AfD. Also, allow me to quote from William James Mills, Exploring Polar Frontiers: A Historical Encyclopedia, Vol. 2: "Ushakov and his two companions explored the west coast of the large central island—October Revolution—before crossing a strait to Komsomolets Island and sledging to the northernmost point of the archipelago. This is now known as Arctic Cape, though Ushakov originally named it for the later disgraced politician Vyechyslav Molotov." Glenfarclas (talk) 06:14, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: While I was typing the above reply, the nominator tagged this page db-author. Since there's now substantial comment by another author (sorry) I've removed the speedy deletion tag, but suggest speedy close as a withdrawn nomination. Glenfarclas (talk) 06:18, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD restored

Hi Advisors, I'm sorry if I've given you trouble on account of this AfD, but I feel that it should be closed properly and retained, just like any other AfD. Obviously we both now think that Arctic Cape should be kept, but that doesn't mean we ought to blank and delete the AfD. I suggested that User:JoJan restore it, which he has. I'm going to put it back on the daily log and restore the AfD template to the article. I'd appreciate if you would not blank out that information until the nomination is properly closed. Thanks— Glenfarclas (talk) 11:28, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I should mention that I can understand why you would think that the best way to withdraw an AfD nomination is just to delete it so that other people don't have to bother with it. That seems like the easiest thing to do, but it's better to follow the ordinary procedures: just note your withdrawal on the AfD and either close it yourself or just let someone else do it, it really does not take that much time. Glenfarclas (talk) 11:37, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I unfortunately do not know much English. I write mostly in ruwiki, so the rules of the English section do not know. Do as the procedure.

Recently, I found 6 articles in different languages contain factual error. All copied from the English language. This article is Cape Zhelaniya. In nlwiki (nl:Kaap Zjelania) error still exists. Advisor^{speak en-2} 13:02, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо! What is the error in Cape Zhelaniya? Glenfarclas (talk) 23:13, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"is the easternmost point of Europe.": [2]. Later fix error [3], but have been translations into other languages. Advisor^{speak en-2} 00:23, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cape Zhelaniya

Hello, Advisors. I saw that you've changed the page Cape Zhelaniya. (^[1]). I used this web-site (^[2]), altogether with other web-pages (^[3], ^[4] etc.) as references to support my writing. Can you please point to me at least 3 other reference web-pages that you used for your changes? Thank you, Dako1 February 17, 2010 - 20:29 (UTC)

Hello. This is big error. Polar station on Cape Zhelaniya [4]. Cape Flissingski: [5]. See also official map: [6] and Google Maps Мыс Флиссингский. Wikipedia itself is not an authoritative source. Advisor^{speak en-2} 03:57, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Geography of Sakha

Category:Geography of Sakha, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Russavia ^{I'm chanting as we speak} 17:27, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lac de Mâl for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lac de Mâl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lac de Mâl until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thegreatluigi (talk) 13:50, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Мастер теней. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

По поводу РВП: каторга, водные объекты, КУ-КУЛ и АК:1031

Добрый день! У меня к тебе просьба. Дело в том, что сейчас разбирается иск ru:АК:1031 по поводу снятия с меня части ограничений. Скажем так, я не очень доволен проектом решения, хотя мы с наставниками и пришли к кое-какому консенсусу и вроде бы "ну и пусть" (типа я дорабатываю статью, а они подводят итог; процесс, конечно, тормозится). Но главное - до снятия ограничений как минимум 3 месяца и то не факт.

Вообще, дикая слоупочность сообщества и растянутые во времени сроки в Википедии меня крайне не устраивают. Поэтому обращаюсь именно к тебе, поскольку давно наблюдаю за твоей деятельностью. Так вот. У тебя полгода назад был проект каторжных работ для википедистов под наставничеством, чтобы снимать блокировки и топикбаны не по времени, а по обязательному вкладу. Соответственно прошу: выскажи подобное предложение на СО иска, а мне подкинь сколько-то необходимых статей. Про реки, посёлки, да про что угодно, лишь бы КУЛ разгрести и спасти многие статьи с КУ (а я ведь заметил, что там почти всё выносимое вполне можно спасти! но всем лень, проще удалить, значимость не показана - а поискать и показать её никто типа не обязан!). Если управлюсь меньше чем за 3 месяца - так тому и быть. А я точно управлюсь, сколько бы работы ни было, потому что "они" могут годами переименование одной статьи обсуждать, а для меня это срок на сколько угодно новых.

Как тебе такая идея? Надоело уже сидеть под этими бессмысленными ограничениями, когда можно было бы 100500 статей написать без них. Чё 3 месяца ждать? В общем, прошу предложить идею о каторге на СО иска. Фред-Продавец звёзд (talk) 12:32, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

АК уже написал предварительное решение, а коней на переправе не меняют. Здесь время упущено. В прочем, итог по каторге планирую в ближайшее время. Advisor^{speak en-2} 13:18, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cape_Zhelaniya&action=history

[2] ttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_points_of_Europe

[3] ttp://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Extreme_points_of_Europe

[4] ttp://en.allexperts.com/e/e/ex/extreme_points_of_europe.htm

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]