User talk:AddictionPsychologistFrank

Welcome!

Hello, AddictionPsychologistFrank, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! RexRowan Talk 21:03, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you are looking for adoption, please try this one: [1] -- RexRowan Talk 21:05, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hi AddictionPsychologistFrank,

Welcome to wikipedia! I'm always happy to see people who are educated in psychology/certified psychologists becoming editors. I saw your additions to the Psychologist talk page. I'm a rather new editor myself only having been here for about 8 months.

When I started out I was always being very careful to make sure that everyone agreed with any changes, before I made them. My advice to you is "Just do it!" This approach is actually backed up by wikipedia policy WP:BOLD Pages improve by people taking the initiative and editing boldly. As long as you have a reference to back up what you're saying, nobody can really dispute your information. Some pages have alot of incorrect information, this info maybe out of date, or may have been written by someone who was misinformed in the first place. If you have a reference that says otherwise, go ahead and change it.

Anyway, I look forward to seeing some of your future edits.

I remember that when I first started out there was a fair bit to learn, so if there is anything you're not sure on that I can help you with just post on my (talk) page below.

Kind Regards

MitchMcM (talk) 10:21, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ref tags and boxes

Hi,

Ofcourse my offer still stands, happy to help. I went back and had a look at the previous version of the page you are talking about. You were on the right track with your referencing, but not quite right. For most citations, click cite in the edit window and from the drop-down template box pick the appropriate type of reference and fill in the details. The named reference system you were using is for when you plan on using a single reference on multiple occasions. In the first instance cite using the drop-down template box and also put in a reference name. Then, for all subequent occasions when you use that reference, you can just use the reference name, rather than writing out the whole reference again. If you cite like this wikipedia is set up to write out and format the reference list automatically by inserting {{reflist}} under the references heading (which is already there). Once the references are appearing correctly you can delete the list that's currently there.

With regards to the boxes at the top of the page these are added by any editors and flag issues for other editors and general readers of the page. You generally shouldn't remove these unless you are sure you've dealt with the problem adequately. They are found at the very top of the page (above the article text) when you click edit.

I also noticed that there is currently a dicussion on whether to merge the page with behavioral addiction, so just be aware that some of the content you are adding maybe lost if a merge goes ahead. You can contribute to the discussion of this issue and state whether you agree or diagree with a merge and your reasons why. Generally, they will go with the majority.

Tell me whether this helps you out. There is often quite alot to learn when you are starting out, but once you've got the basics down you'll start to pick up other things quickly.

MitchMcM (talk) 12:19, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption

Hi! I see you are requesting adoption and so would like to offer to adopt you. Myself and my replacement/assistant, RexRowan have an adoption school, which can teach you all the basics of Wikipedia. We believe the adoption course is a great beginning to your Wikipedia life and User talk:RexRowan, who has completed the course himself, will happily tell you how useful the course was.

The adoption school contains a series of 10 lessons, each focusing on a different aspect and with a short test at the end of each. The lessons are then followed by a final exam. You can find those at User:Adam mugliston/Adopt to see if they would be of interest to you.

We also offer an Express course, which means you can choose just one, a few or most of the lessons if you would prefer not to do the full course.

Should you be interested in getting adopted, please read this Code of Honour, then return here and press the button below, filling in USERNAME with your username with out the User: prefix. This questionnaire gives me an insight into you and allows me to adjust the course should I need to, so please fill it in. In it, you will also be able to say whether you prefer the full or Express course.

Also, please drop a line to say you are interested either below this message or on my talk page at User talk:Adam mugliston.

Thanks,

Adam Mugliston Talk 19:12, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AddictionPsychologistFrank, I noticed you created the above requested information page in the article space. I have moved it to Adam mugliston's user space at User:Adam mugliston/Adopt/Entry/AddictionPsychologistFrank, as that is where it belongs. Cheers, —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:01, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Frank

Hi there,

It'd be great if you can join project psychology and share your knowledge here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Psychology. --RexRowan (talk) 12:43, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Frank, I will review your application tomorrow morning and let you know. Adam Mugliston Talk 21:30, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your application has been successful. Well done. I will let you know when your adoption page is ready. Adam Mugliston Talk 15:16, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, AddictionPsychologistFrank. You have new messages at Adam mugliston's talk page.
Message added 06:18, 14 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Adam Mugliston Talk 06:18, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Addiction Psychology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tolerance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, AddictionPsychologistFrank. You have new messages at Talk:Addiction Psychology.
Message added 09:59, 22 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Proposed deletion of Addiction Psychology

The article Addiction Psychology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unweildy dissertation-style article could really use a fresh-start...

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nik thestunned 12:07, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Addiction Psychologist concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Addiction Psychologist, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:16, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Addiction Psychologist

Hello AddictionPsychologistFrank. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled Addiction Psychologist.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Addiction Psychologist}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 14:23, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

HI! I have made some changes to the overall content of the page. I have taken the advise of someone many months ago (the article is too long & it reads more like a dissertation rather than an encyclopedia article). As a result I have deleted some very specific detail that not only defined but in some cases explained the term. AddictionPsychologistFrank (talk) 16:59, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If I am correct now the references for my above comment should now be moved to the 'Further Reading' section. Is this correct?AddictionPsychologistFrank (talk) 16:59, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

edit the submissionAddictionPsychologistFrank (talk) 17:05, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Where do I put this link so it is effective? ==Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Addiction Psychologist==

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Addiction Psychologist · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, AddictionPsychologistFrank, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. AddictionPsychologistFrank (talk) 17:14, 8 December 2013 (UTC) AddictionPsychologistFrank (talk) 17:14, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]