User talk:Adamhooperdonor

Welcome!

Hello, Adamhooperdonor, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement, and you may wish to read our newspaper The Signpost. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 10:14, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

September 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Sperm donation has been reverted.
Your edit here to Sperm donation was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/groups/1625590367712535/, https://www.facebook.com/groups/286807812092454/, https://www.facebook.com/groups/186095942222651/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 10:14, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mean as custard (talk) 11:04, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Deli nk (talk) 11:47, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mean as Custard! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_links I am following the Guide Lines of the External Links, You don't understand the topic of Sperm Donation, there is a link on there to IVF Australia which is for profit! Sperm Donation Australia has more births through there than clinics in Australia, why wouldn't it be worthy to going in under sperm donation it is now significant part of the subject of Sperm donation!

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Adamhooperdonor reported by User:Deli nk (Result: ). Thank you. Deli nk (talk) 12:01, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sperm donation. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 12:02, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Velella. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Acroterion (talk) 14:22, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 14:25, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If edit-warring, personal attacks or promotional activities resume after this block expires, the next block will be indefinite. Acroterion (talk) 14:29, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adamhooperdonor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

tou have all these rules and yet you dont go by them and constantly shifting the goal post

Decline reason:

The goalposts remain where they were. You've ignored clear warnings in your zeal to promote your fresh sperm club. Please note that any further edit-warring or spamming will absolutely result in a longer block. Kuru (talk) 15:42, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I contact an editor with a diplomatic response and then another editor jumps in. Let the one editor deal with the situation rather than the bully team up tactics. Adamhooperdonor (talk) 15:24, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note from blocking admin: Your responses were far from diplomatic [1] [2]. The rules require you to abide by Wikipedia sourcing policy, to avoid promotion (especially self-promotion), to refrain from edit-warring, and to treat editors who try to explain site policies to you with respect. Wikipedia is a collaborative editing environment, and you must expect to work with the community, not just individual editors. You were very close to receiving an immediate indefinite block for your pattern of conduct. Acroterion (talk) 15:31, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

<abuse removed> Since the latest comments make it clear that no improvement is to be expected, block is extended to indefinite. Further talkpage abuse not relating to serious unblock requests will result in removal of talkpage access. Acroterion (talk) 02:04, 3 September 2018 (UTC) Learn the definition of abuse, no abusive words were used, accurate descripitive words were used this my talk page and not yours so another complete power trip.[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Acroterion (talk) 02:38, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]