User talk:DextersLabFan

Wel.com.e

Welcome!

Hello, DextersLabFan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Elfin341 05:15, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ted CoCorvs

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ted CoCorvs, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Stormbay (talk) 02:45, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Robert Alvarez

I have nominated Robert Alvarez, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Alvarez. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jrtayloriv (talk) 22:57, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello DextersLabFan! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 7 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Allison Moore - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:15, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Allison Moore

The article Allison Moore has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable actress who only had one role in just one show, thus failing to meet WP:NOTE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 72.145.66.202 (talk) 20:21, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They Must Be Giants listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect They Must Be Giants. Since you had some involvement with the They Must Be Giants redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Beeblebrox (talk) 17:52, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Smart Talk with Raisin for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Smart Talk with Raisin, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smart Talk with Raisin until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JJ98 (Talk) 05:57, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proto-Courage listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Proto-Courage. Since you had some involvement with the Proto-Courage redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). JJ98 (Talk) 06:51, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proto-Muriel listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Proto-Muriel. Since you had some involvement with the Proto-Muriel redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). JJ98 (Talk) 17:27, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proto-Eustace listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Proto-Eustace. Since you had some involvement with the Proto-Eustace redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). JJ98 (Talk) 17:30, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of characters in Courage the Cowardly Dog for deletion

The article List of characters in Courage the Cowardly Dog is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of characters in Courage the Cowardly Dog until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JJ98 (Talk) 06:27, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of characters in Courage the Cowardly Dog for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of characters in Courage the Cowardly Dog is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of characters in Courage the Cowardly Dog until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JJ98 (Talk) 09:45, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Courage the Cowardly Dog characters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Courage the Cowardly Dog characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Courage the Cowardly Dog characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 17:47, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Courage the Cowardly Dog characters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Courage the Cowardly Dog characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Courage the Cowardly Dog characters (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 09:18, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]