User talk:79.2.234.49

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

79.2.234.49 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I seem to have been accused of "LTA socking". I have certainly done no such thing. Even if you disagreed with my edits (as someone did), you can't possibly believe they were abusive. 79.2.234.49 (talk) 20:02, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Hello, WP:LTA/BKFIP! Hope you are enjoying your tour of Italy. Favonian (talk) 20:11, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

79.2.234.49 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

That response to my unblock request makes no sense. None of my edits were in any way or sense abusive. Please explain which ones you thought were intended to be damaging and I'll explain why I made them.79.2.234.49 (talk) 20:22, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 21:12, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

79.2.234.49 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The reason for the block is not clear, so if I did not address it, that's hardly my fault. The block is obviously not necssary to prevent damage or disruption to wikipedia because I haven't done anything damaging or disurpttive. Unseful contributions instead?? Instead of the useful contributions I already made?? 79.2.234.49 (talk) 21:21, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Allow me to clarify. You are accused of being the Best known for IP, a long term disruptive editor. Your edit warring at Serial killer is reminiscent of this editor. PhilKnight (talk) 22:22, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

---