User talk:1to0to-1
Hello 1to0to-1. I undid your change at Algebra because everything in that section is supposed to be an algebraic structure. A high school course like Algebra 2 is clearly a course, not an algebraic structure. There might be some other place where you could add this information, but I don't know where at the moment. EdJohnston (talk) 00:22, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Some Algebra 2 problems.gif
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Some Algebra 2 problems.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock (TALK) 02:50, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Cloverleaf Quasar Image.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Cloverleaf Quasar Image.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:40, 28 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 15:40, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Sound: aa. Firstly thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic one which we already have a page - Å. Your enthusiasm is fantastic, but unfortunately your article has been nominated for deletion in accordance with our policies. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we'd love for you to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Å - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest this deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article you created (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on Talk:Sound: aa explaining your position, although an administrator may still believe deletion to be necessary. Regardless, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, as doing such often creates unnecessary confusion. If you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Hang in there and try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.
— ækTalk 00:55, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Links to cloverleaf quasar
[edit]While enthusiasm is a good thing, please stop putting links to cloverleaf quasar into articles that are only marginally related to it. It should be in list of quasars, and probably briefly mentioned in gravitational lens, and that's about it. It's an interesting object, but "see also" sections are for things that are strongly related to the article in question. --Christopher Thomas (talk) 03:59, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
Template:Against Köppen has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —hike395 (talk) 04:41, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Rancho Carrillo
[edit]The material in Rancho Carillo has been incorporated into the main article on Carlsbad, CA. An article about a minor subdivision, particularly one that sounds like real estate advertising, is not suitable for wikipedia. Please cease reinserting this material. Thank you. Montanabw(talk) 02:11, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Cloverleaf Quasar
[edit]Hello 1to0to-1. In your article, Cloverleaf Quasar, the first sentence reads as follows: "The Cloverleaf Quasar (H1413+117, QSO J1415+1129) is a bright, gravitationally-lensed quasar." Could you explain what "(H1413+117, QSO J1415+1129)" means. It may be confusing to whoever is reading the article.E-sub-n (talk) 01:24, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Chåmpionship listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chåmpionship. Since you had some involvement with the Chåmpionship redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 05:12, 22 June 2016 (UTC)