User talk:0biblos

Welcome!

Hello, 0biblos, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Pappano's essential ring cycle, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Uncletomwood (talk) 04:03, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pappano's essential ring cycle

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Pappano's essential ring cycle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Uncletomwood (talk) 04:03, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Status and Advice

Please ignore the above. As reviewing administrator, I of course did not delete the article, for the context was totally clear. What is needed,is references. Please also realize that not all BBC programs are notable--there really needs to be at least one good third part reference to a substantial review. I advise you to fix the problem, and do this very quickly, before the article gets nominated for deletion by a regular deletion process. DGG ( talk ) 04:17, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

0biblos, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi 0biblos! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Woolwich incident.

Please be careful with this article. There are several issues that are especially important, WP:BLP which means that living people have to be treated with respect, even if it is alleged that they are nasty. The second is WP:RS, in articles like this every fact should be backed up by a reliable source. You also need to keep an eye on neutrality.Martin451 (talk) 19:57, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

woolwich beheading

I work irregularly as a journalist so I'll be careful to keep it neutral. I'm only reporting the comments by the police, government and the remarks the alleged attackers have mode recorded on video. Justification for lack of sources is that they are verbatim from television news