User talk:01leeteo

01leeteo, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi 01leeteo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Soni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:23, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Jackie Bird

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jackie Bird, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 15:27, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to The One Show

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The One Show, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 02:23, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, 01leeteo. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Racklever (talk) 11:29, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 page

Hi there,

I notice you are very interested in the 2016 in the United Kingdom page. I see you have made a lot of edits there, but it doesn't look like you have checked your grammar and spelling before adding content, causing some people to delete it even though it is often valuable content. Might I suggest that you try typing it out in Word and using a spell-checker there before adding it to Wikipedia? Absolutelypuremilk (talk) 17:30, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

He either didn't read this, or chose to ignore you, since he continues to bombard that page with an almost daily torrent of poorly-written trivia. Wjfox2005 (talk) 15:01, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Poorly sourced material is another concern. Links to msn.com tend to expire fairly quickly, so are useless as references. Please actually bother to search for better sources, such as Guardian, Telegraph, The Times, BBC, Independent, and so on. I notice you've added a lot of these links, and when I get the time I'm going to delete them all and replace as many as I can. This is Paul (talk) 13:17, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2017 in the United Kingdom

It seems to me that you were trying to copy from 2016 in the United Kingdom article directly from the page itself, next time try copying from the source of the page. ∼∼∼∼ Eric0928^Talk 17:37, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

01leeteo, no offence but you are clearly illiterate, and incapable of writing in the correct style. Please stop contributing to the 2017 UK article. Wjfox2005 (talk) 19:12, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Every day I read the 2017 UK page and it's filled with your badly-written shite. Please STOP contributing there. Wjfox2005 (talk) 10:45, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, 01leeteo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, 01leeteo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 01leeteo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 01leeteo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Hello, I'm LakesideMiners. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Peter Allen (UK broadcaster)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. LakesideMiners^{My Talk Page} 14:57, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Good Morning Britain (2014 TV programme). 5 albert square (talk) 15:21, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 5 albert square (talk) 15:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain your recent edits? You were editing quite sensibly up until this point. About 3 minutes after that edit, you made this one that appears to be full of spelling errors and about 20 minutes later made this strange edit and then trying to change the spelling of someone's name. Your behaviour is very strange. An explanation would be appreciated - you can still respond on your talk page as I have not blocked you from editing that.-- 5 albert square (talk) 15:58, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

becuase those edits are true

Not true. Lorraine Kelly is not 89 years old and Janet Street-Porter is not 92 years old. Try again.-- 5 albert square (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

but they are old women who need to retire old people on tv have no place lok at ruth langsford she has wrinkles on her face old hag

It doesn't matter what you think. Why did you make useful edits and then suddenly vandalise the encyclopedia?-- 5 albert square (talk) 19:27, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block

I share the concerns of Admin 5 albert square. You have either decided to vandalise Wikipedia in order to further the agenda that you have stated, above, or your account has become compromised. Either way we cannot permit you to edit until these issues have been resolved. I have therefore extended your block to indefinite. You need to explain your edits and convince a reviewing admin that this vandalism will not be repeated and also demonstrate that you have control of your account. You may post your unblock request to this talk page for administrator review. You can follow these instructions. Just Chilling (talk) 23:27, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks JC for taking a look. 01leeteo your edits have been extremely strange and I was actually also about to block you indefinitely. You were editing a page that you created about 2019 events in the United Kingdom and you edited about the fire at the Ocado warehouse. That was the last sensible edit that you made. Then you vandalised that page 3 minutes later and then seemed to go off on some sort of agenda vandalising pages of presenters for the BBC and ITV as well as the pages of ITV programmes. As well as the above edits, you edited Good Morning Britain to state that it is 195 minutes long. Yet the broadcaster's own website backs up what we say. In order for any unblock appeal to stand a chance of success, you will need to fully explain what has happened and follow the instructions in the unblock template.-- 5 albert square (talk) 00:01, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me. My sister / brother / mother / father / friend / roommate / used my computer and pretended to be me. I won't let this happen again. it wasnt me as someone hacked my account, i promise this wont happen again — Preceding unsigned comment added by 01leeteo (talk • contribs) 10:06, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to appeal you need to use the template in the orange box, above. Just Chilling (talk) 14:55, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock | reason= Someone hacked in to my account and pretended to be me and did all that, i apologise and since changed my login to make sure that doesnt happen again so please unblock me please.

{{unblock | reason= Someone hacked in to my account and pretended to be me and did all that, i apologise and since changed my login to make sure that doesnt happen again so please unblock me please. my account has been compromised

I am going to withdraw talk page access now. Enough is enough. I don't believe that you are the owner of this account because you have not copied and pasted the unblock template properly and the edits are now coming across as trolling. You may appeal through WP:UTRS if you wish but I would suggest that you read the guide to appealing blocks first of all.-- 5 albert square (talk) 23:34, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]