Jump to content

User:Velella/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:Velela/sandbox

"Witty" citation spamming

[edit]

User:Asw 65 hF8 4 edits all 24 July 2023 User:Mwitty - 45 edits from 18 July 2013 to 6 September 2018 User:ZjXu8910- 5 edits - 5 September 2023 User:GHtr6543 - 28 edits 3 August 2023 to 18 September 2023 User:HrSW u76tr -3 edits 12 June 2023

Banks Peninsula definition

[edit]

https://teara.govt.nz/en/interactive/10293/canterburys-landforms - Ministry of Culture and Heritage - a simple map showing Banks Peninsula WaitahawaiwaterofCanterburysection4DiscoveringyourlocalwaterwayBanksPeninsulaHoromaka.PDF from ECAN url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ecan.govt.nz%2Fdocument%2Fdownload%3Furi%3D1379504&usg=AOvVaw3s69G6fIS2-3fta6A88AaS provides a definition of Banks Peninsula including Lyttelton Much academic research takes the view that Banks Peninsula is comprised of the whole of the volcanic rock sequences such as https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274972191_Faulting_in_Banks_Peninsula_tectonic_setting_and_structural_controls_for_late_Miocene_intraplate_volcanism_New_Zealand Britannica includes Lyttleton within its definition - https://www.britannica.com/place/Banks-Peninsula It also includes a specific reference to the Heathcote valley being within the Banks Peninsula "The focus of this temblor was relatively shallow, however, occurring only 3 miles (5 km) beneath the surface of Heathcote Valley, a suburb of Christchurch located on the Banks Peninsula" - https://www.britannica.com/event/Christchurch-earthquakes-of-2010-2011 The Banks Peninsula landscape Study for Christchurch City Council in 2007 uses the boundary of the then subsumed Banks Peninsula District Council and puts the boundary along the crest of the Port Hills. - https://www.healthyharbour.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Boffa-Miskell-2007-Banks-Peninsula-Landscape-Study-Final-Report.pdf

Tags

[edit]

(talk page stalker)


To work on

[edit]

British biologist stubs

Drinking-Water Standards for New Zealand: 2005 (DWSNZ 2005)

Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg Saltmarsh, Cleaveland & Gund, Bilzin Sumberg,Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, E-crowd,Kameelion , Fisher & Phillips, Hall Booth Smith & Slover, Kilpatrick Stockton, A. Eicoff & Company,Eicoff and co, A eicoff and co,Eicoff and company,Eicoff, A. Eicoff and Company, A Eicoff & Company ,A Eicoff ,Noel Turner (musician), Merus, Day Pitney,QT Talk, Arnstein & Lehr, Banner & Witcoff, Winston & Strawn, HMS69‎, ShNB Forex, Katten Muchin Rosenman,Joel James‎, Sardar Shaukat Ali Kashmiri‎ , Asghar Ali Javed, McAndrews, Held & Malloy

List of Rust (fungus) species

[edit]

Need to check current taxonomy Order Pucciniales / Uredinales

Family Chaconiaceae
Achrotelium'
Aplopsora
Aplopsora corni
Aplopsora dicentrae
Aplopsora hennenii --Vochysiaceae
Aplopsora nyssae
Aplopsora qualeae
Aplopsora tanakae
Botryorhiza
Botryorhiza hippocratea
Botryorhiza hippocrateae
Ceraceopsora
Ceraceopsora elaeagni
Ceropsora
Ceropsora piceae
Chaconia
Chaconia africana -- syn Ypsilospora africana
Chaconia alutacea
Chaconia baphiae -- syn Ypsilospora baphiae
Chaconia berroana
Chaconia brasiliensis
Chaconia braziliensis
Chaconia butleri
Chaconia coaetanea
Chaconia ingae
Goplana
Goplana andina
Goplana aporosae
Goplana australis
Goplana cissi
Goplana concinna
Goplana dioscoreae
Goplana ecuadorica
Goplana espeletiae
Goplana indica
Maravalia
Maravalia achroa
Maravalia africana
Maravalia albescens Synonym for Chaconia alutacea
Maravalia allophyli
Maravalia amazonensis
Maravalia ascotela
Maravalia aulica
Maravalia bauhiniicola
Maravalia bolivarensis
Olivea
Olivea capituliformis
Olivea colebrookiana
Olivea fimbriata
Olivea isonandrae
Olivea petitiae
Olivea scitula
Olivea tectonae
Olivea viticis
Telomapea
Telomapea inocarpi
Family Coleosporiaceae
Chrysomyxa
Chrysomyxa abietis
Chrysomyxa albida --Syn Kuehneola uredinis
Chrysomyxa aliena
Chrysomyxa alpina
Chrysomyxa arctostaphyli
Chrysomyxa bambusae --Syn Kweilingia bambusae
Chrysomyxa bombacis
Coleosporium
Diaphanopellis
Gallowaya
Stilbechrysomyxa
Family Cronartiaceae
Cronartium-
Endocronartium-
Peridermium
Family Melampsoraceae
Melampsora
Family Mikronegeriaceae
Chrysocelis
Mikronegeria
Petersonia
Family Phakopsoraceae
Aeciure
Arthuria
Batistopsora
Bubakia
Catenulopsora
Cerotelium
Crossopsora
Dasturella
Kweilingia
Macabuna
Monosporidium
Newinia
Nothoravenelia
Phakopsora
Phragmidiella
Physopella
Pucciniostele
Scalarispora
Tunicopsora
Uredendo
Uredopeltis
Uredostilbe
Family Phragmidiaceae
Arthuriomyces
Frommeella
Gerwasia
Gymnoconia
Hamaspora
Joerstadia
Kuehneola
Mainsia
Morispora
Phragmidium
Physonema
Scutelliformis
Trachyspora
Xenodochus
Family Pileolariaceae
Pileolaria
Skierka
Uromycladium
Family Pucciniaceae
Chrysocyclus
Chrysopsora
Cleptomyces
Coleopucciniella
Corbulopsora
Cumminsiella
Cystopsora
Endophyllum
Gymnosporangium
Kernella
Miyagia
Polioma
Puccinia
Puccinia angustata
Puccinia arachidis
Puccinia aristidae
Puccinia asparagi--Asparagus rust
Puccinia cacabata
Puccinia campanulae
Puccinia carthami
Puccinia coronata
Puccinia dioicae
Puccinia erianthi
Puccinia extensicola
Puccinia graminis--Stem rust, black rust or cereal rust
Puccinia helianthi
Puccinia hordei
Puccinia horiana--Chrysanthemum white rust
Puccinia kuehnii
Puccinia malvacearum
Puccinia melanocephala
Puccinia menthae
Puccinia monoica
Puccinia pelargonii-zonalis
Puccinia phyllostachydis, Kusano
Puccinia pittieriana
Puccinia poarum --Coltsfoot rust gall
Puccinia psidii--Guava rust or Eucalyptus rust
Puccinia punctiformis
Puccinia purpurea
Puccinia recondita--Brown rust (of wheat)
Puccinia schedonnardii
Puccinia striiformis--Yellow rust (of wheat)
Puccinia subnitens
Puccinia substriata
Puccinia thaliae
Puccinia triticina--Wheat rust
Puccinia urticata
Puccinia verruca
Puccinia xanthii
Ramakrishnania
Roestelia
Stereostratum
Uromyces
Uromyces apiosporus
Uromyces beticola
Uromyces ciceris-arietini
Uromyces dianthi
Uromyces euphorbiae
Uromyces graminis
Uromyces inconspicuus
Uromyces lineolatus subsp. nearcticus
Uromyces medicaginis
Uromyces musae
Uromyces oblongus
Uromyces pisi-sativi - syn: Uromyces pisi --Cypress Spurge
Uromyces proëminens var. poinsettiae
Uromyces transversalis--Gladiolus rust
Uromyces trifolii-repentis var. fallens
Uromyces viciae-fabae var. viciae-fabae
Xenostele
Zaghouania
Family Pucciniosiraceae
Alveolaria
Baeodromus
Ceratocoma
Chardoniella
Cionothrix
Didymopsora
Dietelia
Gambleola
Pucciniosira
Trichopsora
Family Pucciniastraceae
Calyptospora
Hyalopsora
Melampsorella
Melampsoridium
Milesia
Milesina
Naohidemyces
Peridiopsora
Pucciniastrum
Pucciniastrum americanum
Pucciniastrum arcticum
Pucciniastrum coryli
Pucciniastrum epilobii
Pucciniastrum hydrangeae
Thekopsora
Uredinopsis
Family Raveneliaceae
Allotelium
Anthomyces
Anthomycetella
Apra
Bibulocystis
Cumminsina
Cystomyces
Diabole
Diabolidium
Dicheirinia
Diorchidiella
Diorchidium
Endoraecium
Esalque
Hapalophragmium
Kernkampella
Lipocystis
Nyssopsora
Ravenelia
Sphaerophragmium
Sphenospora
Spumula
Triphragmiopsis
Triphragmium
Ypsilospora
Family Sphaerophragmiaceae
Family Uropyxidaceae
Dasyspora
Didymopsorella
Dipyxis
Kimuromyces
Leucotelium
Macruropyxis
Mimema
Ochropsora
Phragmopyxis
Poliomopsis
Porotenus
Prospodium
Sorataea
Tranzschelia
Uropyxis

Reservoirs and lakes

[edit]

Unesco copy and paste

[edit]

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Help_desk/Archives/2017_February_1#Articles_created_by_cut_and_paste_content_from_non_copyright_sources> see <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants_talk:Project/John_Cummings/Wikimedian_in_Residence_at_UNESCO_2017-2018/Final>.

sewage treatment process selection

[edit]

Process selection

[edit]

Many technical, environmental and economic factors affect the design of a sewage treatment plant and, with the exception of small rural works, each one will be designed to suit the particular conditions encountered..[1]: 215  Each design therefore depends on an analysis of all these factors to determine the optimum combination of processes to suit the expected range of loadings, both with regards to quality of the input, the required output standards and the maximum and minimum rates of flow expected. A life cycle assessment (LCA) can be used, with criteria or weightings attributed to the various aspects. This makes the final decision subjective to some extent.[1]: 216  A range of publications exist to help with technology selection.[1]: 221 [2][3][4]

In industrialized countries, the most important parameters in process selection are typically efficiency in both output quality and energy use, reliability, and space requirements. In developing countries, they might be different and the focus might be more on construction and operating costs as well as process simplicity.[1]: 218 

Choosing the most suitable treatment process is complex because of the range of constraints and requirements. Where geography is appropriate a gravity sewerage system may feed the works which may allow a system driven largely by gravity such as trickling filters and a gravity effluent discharge. In low-lying areas energy costs may be more significant because of the need to pump sewage. Where land is expensive, the use of compact systems such as activated sludge processes may be indicated with thermophilic sludge digestion to reduce sludge volumes and generate biogas. The nature of the influent sewage also affects the choice of processes. A high strength and low-flow influent would require much more oxidative treatment capacity than a high flow strength influent, which might in turn require much larger settlement capacity. Highly variable strength and flow pose special difficulties in design and may indicate the need for duplicate process units that can be witched in or out depending on the prevailing influent composition.

Industrial processes in the catchment can contribute difficult to treat components which may require extended treatment or more specialized processes such a roughing filters, or polishing lagoon provision.

Where treatment plants are installed close to housing or work-places, odor control becomes a significant constraint, especially in sludge handling. Design requirements may include covered sludge processing units with active air extraction and treatment.

Automation of sewage treatment plants has reduced the size of the work-force need to keep the plant operational for many larger works in the developed world[5] treatment have resisted automation including managing issues such as sludge bulking, excess ragging in the influent, sludge transport off site etc. The need for expert personnel remains a constraint especially in high pay, low unemployment areas.

A textbook listed them as follows: "process applicability, applicable flow, acceptable flow variation, influent characteristics, inhibiting or refractory compounds, climatic aspects, process kinetics and reactor hydraulics, performance, treatment residuals, sludge processing, environmental constraints, chemical product requirements, energy requirements, requirements of other resources, personnel requirements, operating and maintenance requirements, ancillary processes, reliability, complexity, compatibility, area availability".[1]: 219 

With regards to environmental impacts of sewage treatment plants the following aspects are included in the selection process: "Odors, vector attraction, sludge transportation, sanitary risks, air contamination, soil and subsoil contamination, surface water pollution or groundwater contamination, devaluation of nearby areas, inconvenience to the nearby population".[1]: 220 

  1. ^ a b c d e f Cite error: The named reference Marcos2 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  2. ^ Cite error: The named reference :04 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  3. ^ Spuhler, Dorothee; Germann, Verena; Kassa, Kinfe; Ketema, Atekelt Abebe; Sherpa, Anjali Manandhar; Sherpa, Mingma Gyalzen; Maurer, Max; Lüthi, Christoph; Langergraber, Guenter (2020). "Developing sanitation planning options: A tool for systematic consideration of novel technologies and systems". Journal of Environmental Management. 271: 111004. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111004. PMID 32778289. S2CID 221100596.
  4. ^ Spuhler, Dorothee; Scheidegger, Andreas; Maurer, Max (2020). "Comparative analysis of sanitation systems for resource recovery: Influence of configurations and single technology components". Water Research. 186: 116281. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2020.116281. PMID 32949886. S2CID 221806742.
  5. ^ Haimi, Henri; Mulas, Michela; Vahala, Riku (October 2010). "Process automation in Wastewater Treatment Plants: the Finnish experience". E-WAter.