User:Seabuckthorn/sandbox (GAN analysis template)

• 1: Well-written:

• 1a: the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.

In what ways does this article pass 1a, and what 1a problems exist?

• 1b: it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.

Are there problems with the lead? With the layout? With the other sections listed above?

• 2: Verifiable with no original research:

• 2a: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.

Do you see any significant problem with the "References" section?

• 2b: reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).

Are there any statements that need to be sourced, but aren't? Are any of the sources unreliable or problematic?

• 2c: it contains no original research.

Do you see any evidence of original research?

• 3: Broad in its coverage:

• 3a: it addresses the main aspects of the topic.

Are there aspects to this article that should be covered, but are missing?

• 3b: it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

Does the article go into unnecessary detail into any aspect?

• 4: Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

Does the article have neutrality problems? Does it fail to mention any notable POV?

• 5: Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

Is the article suffering from an edit war?

• 6: Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

There are no images in this article. Is that a problem?

• Other aspects...

Are there any other things you'd want to bring up in this review?