User:Philonomosian Society Historian/sandbox
Submission declined on 8 October 2024 by KylieTastic (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Founded: January 8th, 1839
Type: Debate and Literary Society
Affiliation: Independent
Status: Active
Scope: Local
Motto: Lex, Libertas, Salusque Gentis
Chapter: 1
Members: 75-100 collegiate
Headquarters: Washington, D.C.
United States
Website:
https://sites.google.com/view/philonomosian
The Philonomosian Society is a student debating society at Georgetown University founded in 1839 by Father John A. McGuigan, S.J.. The Philonomisan Society is one of the oldest collegiate debate and literary societies in the United States. The society’s motto is “Lex, Libertas, Salusque Gentis” which translates to Law, Liberty and the People’s Wellbeing. The original society went dormant following the 1931-1932 academic year. The society was revived in 2023 due to student demands for more free speech on campus and general discontent with Georgetown’s other debate society, Philodemic.
Debates are held weekly on Wednesdays at 8pm. in Georgetown University’s McDonough School of Business. Debates are usually centered around policy, economic, cultural topics. In the style of great collegiate political unions, the Philonomosian divides its membership along ideological lines between five Cohorts: Progressive, Liberal, Independent, Federalist, and Tory. Members align their arguments with the tenets and values of their Cohort but may speak on either side of the resolution.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.