Jump to content

User:Neddyseagoon/sandbox/Hinlopen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jan Jacobszoon Hinlopen
Jan J. Hinlopen around 1665, with his second wife Lucia Wybrants. Painting by Bartholomeus van der Helst, now in a private collection
BornAmsterdam, 1626
DiedAmsterdam, 1666, Plague?
Resting placeNieuwe Kerk
NationalityDutch
Occupation(s)Dealing in real estate, cloth, juridical advisor in the city hall
EmployerSelf-employed
Known forArt collecting,
poems by Jan Vos
Spouse(s)1) Leonore Huydecoper of Maarseveen (1657-63)
2) Lucia Wijbrants (1664-66)
ChildrenJacob, Johanna Maria, Sara and Geertrui
ParentJacob J. Hinlopen & Sara de Wael
RelativesJacob J. Hinlopen

Jan Jacobszoon Hinlopen (1626 - 1666) or Jan J. Hinlopen was a rich Dutch cloth merchant, real estate developer, city schepen and a keen art collector. His paintings are spread all over the world. Jan J. Hinlopen was a maecenas for the arts and is mentioned as an influential protector of Rembrandt. Like his father-in-law Hinlopen is known, because of the poems by Jan Vos on the paintings in his house, quite unique in art history.

Two of Metsu's finest paintings, depicting the Hinlopen family, can be seen in the Metropolitan Museum and the Gemäldegalerie. Probably Metsu placed both paintings in a large room of the city hall.[1] It is unclear how many Gabriel Metsu paintings Jan J. Hinlopen had in his possession. He, his wife or children may have acted as models, more than once.

Life

[edit]

Jan J. Hinlopen was the son of the merchant Jacob J. Hinlopen (1582-1629), dealing in spices and ship chandlery. The family originally came from Flanders, but moved to Amsterdam, on Nieuwendijk, close to the harbour, after Antwerp was occupied by the Spanish. Jan J. Hinlopen lived initially with his brother Jacob J. Hinlopen (1621-1679) on Leliegracht, on the corner of Keizersgracht. The brothers made money from a cloth business on the Warmoesstraat and the building of cheap houses in the Jordaan. After their mother died, who came from a rich Catholic family, they inherited a mansion, designed by Philips Vingboons, situated between Baarn, Soest and Hilversum.

Trying to make a career in the city hall, the brother were participating in the Civic guard. (Jacob J. Hinlopen had an annoying problem when the townhall was opened in 1655 with speeches and festivities. He was asked to leave the city for one day!) In 1657, Jan J. Hinlopen married Leonore Huydecoper of Maarseveen (1631-1663), the daughter of a rich and influential mayor, with a country house in Maarssen, nicely situated on the border of the river Vecht. Jan Vos mounted a performance of five shows for the occasion, with accompanying poems. Every show consisted of at least thirty to forty scenes in allegorical manner, for example on the despairs of Amsterdam during the plague epidemic:

The couple had four children - Jacob, Johanna Maria, Sara and Geertrui. They were baptized in the Westerkerk.

In 1661, after his father-in-law died, Jan was offered a position in the new town hall on the Dam Square. In fall 1663, Jan J . Hinlopen lost within two weeks his youngest daughter and his wife as a consequence of the plague. According to Samuel Pepys ships from Hamburg and Amsterdam were forced to go 30 days in quarantaine. In 1664 24.148 people were buried in Amsterdam and people supposed the plague was caused by digging new canals! Jan remarried with Lucia Wijbrants, after her brother had married his sister.[3] His only son Jacob died in 1665. Jan J. Hinlopen had himself portrayed with his new wife by Bartholomeus van der Helst, portrayed with his dead first wife and children in the background.[4]

Death

[edit]

Jan J. Hinlopen, aged 40 and rather stocky, died shortly after Van der Helst produced his painting. It is not recorded whether Jan too was a victim of the plague, but it is clearly recorded that 1664, 1665 and 1666 were also plague years and more than 10% to 15% of the population died and that everybody that came into contact with the plague was at risk.[5] In June 1665 the Great Plague of London broke out. As in Amsterdam rich people left the cities. Sailors sailing on sea were relatively safe.

Aftermath

[edit]

Johanna Maria and Sara Hinlopen were unhappy with their stepmother, not only because of the inheritance, which seems to have not been arranged very well, but because of quarrels.[6] Lucia Wijbrants made the best of a bad bargain and remarried a mayor from Utrecht in 1672. Neither of the uncles and guardians, Jacob J. Hinlopen and mayor Joan Huydecoper of Maarsseveen, were popular to the fairly independent and very rich girls, and as soon as possible they tried to gain full independence. Joan was eager to have Johanna Maria marry her cousin, Joan's eldest son, but she significantly refused.[7]

In 1679 Johanna Maria Hinlopen married Johan van der Merct, a lawyer from Middelburg, in the church of Amstelveen. Sara also chose a romantic location for her marriage with Albert Geelvinck: the church of Sloterdijk, in those days a popular spot to marry, and a pleasure resort only a few miles outside the citywalls and along the IJ.

Collection

[edit]
Haman with Hester and Ahasuerus, by Rembrandt. Pushkin Museum, Moscow

After the completion in 1660, Rembrandt sold the painting Ahasuerus and Haman at the feast of Esther to Jan J. Hinlopen.[8] This painting is possibly one of the few Rembrandt paintings whose provenance can be traced back to 1662, two year after its completion. In that year a bundle of poems by Jan Vos appeared, some about paintings in the collection of Jan J. Hinlopen.[9]

Here one sees Haman eating with Ahasuerus and Esther.
But it is in vain; his breast is full of regret and pain.
He eats Esther's food; but deeper into her heart.
The king is mad with revenge and rage.

The wrath of a monarch...[10]

The reason for the painting was the play "Hester", by Johannes Serwouters (1623-1677). Provoked by the pogroms in Eastern Europe, it was performed in 1659 and dedicated to his wife Leonore.[11] The Rembrandt is now in the collection of the Pushkin Museum).

Also in Hinlopen's house on Kloveniersburgwal were a Rubens, two paintings by Jan Lievens, one by Bartholomeus van der Helst. Jan also had two paintings by Jan Lievens (The raising of Lazarus, now in Bristol[12], and a Christ in the tomb), a painting of flowers by Willem van Aelst, and a Simon in the temple with Christ as a child by Gerbrand van den Eeckhout. In his sitting room hung a Venus in a cloud full of Cupids by Rubens, which he inherited from his father-in-law. Jan Vos praised Jan's collection of paintings in several poems and the pieces of amber that were given to Leonora by Frederick William, the elector of Brandenburg, and also wrote on the premature death of Jan's wife and children.

Controversy

[edit]

There is a controversy among some art historians about one of the paintings by Metsu, now in the Gemäldegalerie which was already known in the 19th century as Familie des Kaufmanns Gelfing.[13] (For an impression of the painting take a look at this URL).[14] Gelfing should be understood as coming from the family Geelvinck, after both families Hinlopen en Geelvinck died out in 18th century. Since 1976 the painting is called by Van Eeghen La famille du Burgermeister Gillis Valckenier, Gabriel Metsu, 1657 on not very satifying grounds: the bird, which she recognized as a falcon.[15] Her explanation on how the painting got to Switzerland is complicated and little convincing, therefor does not have to be repeated here. Besides burgomaster Gillis Valckenier had only three children at that time.[16] Irene Groeneweg has good arguments that the bird is not a falcon but a parrot.[17] Judith van Gent suggests that the painting in the Metropolitan Museum of Art called Visit to the nursery is depicting also the family Hinlopen (and most probably Sara Hinlopen as a baby).[18] The provenance of that painting is clear and accepted. It comes from Jan Jacobsz. Hinlopen.

Part of Jan's collection passed to his daughter Sara, who died childless at 89 years old and almost blind at the end of her life. Most of her belongings went to the second cousin and nieces of her late husband Albert Geelvinck, though in her will there is nothing written about any painting because of succession duties.

Sources

[edit]
  1. ^ Mak, G. (1997) Het stadspaleis, p. 43.
  2. ^ W. Frijhoff & M. Spies (1999) Bevochten eendracht 1650, p. 456-7.
  3. ^ It is mentioned by the Weeskamer, a board that controlled the orphan's heritage, that he had three children and that their mother's inheritance was "regulated", but the notary is - remarkably - not named.
  4. ^ Dudok van Heel, S.A.C., (1996) Een opmerkelijke dikzak. Jan Hinlopen door Bartholomeus van der Helst, In: Maandblad Amstelodamum, p. 161-166.
  5. ^ Noordegraaf, L. & G. Valk (1988) De Gave Gods. De pest in Holland vanaf de late Middeleeuwen, p. 230.
  6. ^ Goudbeek, R. (z.j.) Geelvinck Hinlopen Huis. Geschiedenis van het Huis en zijn Bewoners (1687-1998)
  7. ^ Kooymans, L. (1997) Vriendschap en de kunst van het overleven in de zeventiende en achttiende eeuw, p.
  8. ^ Dudok van Heel, S.A.C. (1969) De Rembrandt's in de verzamelingen Hinlopen. In: Maandblad Amstelodamum, p. 233-237.
  9. ^ Jan Vos (1726) Alle de gedichten van Jan Vos, p. 360-3; zie ook p. 388, 516, 536.
  10. ^ In: Slive, S. (1953) Rembrandt and his critics, 1630-1730, p. 52.
  11. ^ Schwartz, G. (2006) Rembrandts Universe, His Art His Life His World, p. 112; Schwartz, G. (1987) Rembrandt, zijn leven, zijn schilderijen. Een nieuwe biografie met alle beschikbare schilderijen in kleur afgebeeld, p. 272-6.
  12. ^ The raising of Lazarus by Jan Lievens (1631)
  13. ^ Meyers Konversationlexicon (1885-1892)
  14. ^ http://cgfa.sunsite.dk/metsu/metsu2.jpg The original is in the Gemäldegalerie, Berlin
  15. ^ Eeghen, I.H. van (1976) DE FAMILIESTUKKEN VAN METSU VAN 1657 EN VAN DE WITTE VAN 1678 MET VIER LEVENSGESCHIEDENISSEN (GILLIS VALCKENIER, NICOLAAS LISTINGH, JAN ZEEUW EN CATHARINA VAN DE PERRE). In: Jrb Amstelodamum, p. 78-82.
  16. ^ Birth certificates of 6 children from Gillis Valckenier and Jacoba Ranst
  17. ^ Groeneweg, I. (1995) Regenten in het zwart: vroom en deftig? In: R. Falkenburg, e.a. (red) Beeld en zelfbeeld in de Nederlandse kunst, 1550-1750, pp. 200-4 (Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek, dl. 46)
  18. ^ Gent, J. van, (1998) Portretten van Jan Jacobsz Hinlopen en zijn familie door Gabriël Metsu en Bartholomeus van der Helst. In: Oud Holland 112, p. 127-138.
[edit]

See also

[edit]