Wikipedia:Wikipediology/library/essays/Merovingian-1/Reviews

Review by: Pureblade

Very interesting history of Wikipedia. I never knew that we once had to wikilink LikeThis. I certainly hope that the next few years will bring as much improvement as the last four.

- Pure blade | ^☼ 03:34, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Review by: Jaberwocky6669 | ☎

The WoW vandal totally took me by surprise. It made me realize that vandalism is a problem that is much worse than I originially thought. I also hope that no one looses sight of WP's originial purpose. There is a lot of extra projects going on but time will tell us which of these will stay and which will go. Jaberwocky6669 | ☎ 05:02, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by llywrch (talk)

One criterion this essay should include for true old-timers, IMHO, is "Have you ever revisited an article you wrote in the early days of Wikipedia & found it essentially unchanged? Did this discovery disappoint you (e.g., 'Why hasn't someone bothered to add sources?') or please you (e.g., 'No one found fault with what I wrote, so I must have gotten it right')." -- llywrch (talk) 22:02, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]