User talk:havill

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Eido.inoue! Thank you for your contributions. I am Quenhitran and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! —ALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 08:49, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Arbitration

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Editor COI/NPOV problems with BLP Debito Arudou and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

Thanks,Arudoudebito (talk) 02:31, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation of edit at Arbcom case requests

Per convention, only the initiator, an arbitrator or a clerk (at the request of an arbitrator) should add parties to the list of involved parties. I have removed the two parties added by you. Feel free to propose addition fo the names to the initiator or an arbitrator, but note that the initial reaction is that the case will be declined, so you might wait to see if it is more likely to succeed before proceeding. For the arbitration committee --S Philbrick (Talk) 19:55, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@User talk:Sphilbrick : my bad. Wasn't aware that was part of the protocol. Just trying to be helpful. Thanks for fixing it, and sorry to trouble you.

Debito Arudou discretionary sanctions

Hello Eido.inoue. This is just to let you know that Debito Arudou, an article you have recently edited, is under discretionary sanctions. I've included some boilerplate text about what discretionary sanctions are below. Let me know if you have any questions about it. Best — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 04:29, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Don't know

Don't know really. But your SPI is still open. Sometimes they close fast and sometimes they don't.Serialjoepsycho (talk) 20:33, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It's been over a month. For some reason, I feel bound by unwritten etiquette to refrain from editing until the investigation is over.

Signature

Hello! I wanted to let you know that your signature does not adhere to the signature guidelines. According to the guideline WP:SIGLINK: Signatures must include at least one direct internal link to your user page, user talk page, or contributions page. Your signature reads Eido INOUE 11:14, 10 November 2014 (UTC) (italics added), all in text with no links.

I realize that you aren't editing right now but when you do return to editing, can you please change your signature to conform to the guideline? Thanks! Ca2james (talk) 11:14, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I guess this means I'm going to actually need a user page etc that isn't blank. :) Thanks for the heads up! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.238.28.209 (talk) 02:05, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How's this? Eido INOUE | 井上エイド 🇯🇵 08:31, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another test Eido INOUE | 井上エイド 08:36, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That looks fine to me. By the way, if you don't want to make a user page you can also redirect it to your talk page to avoid it appearing as a red link. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 08:50, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get around to it eventually. Took me forever just to do this after an average of a minor edit or two a year on a Japan related page. Thanks for the tip. Eido INOUE | 井上エイド 14:03, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article Baye McNeil proposed for deletion (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baye McNeil)

Hello Eido.inoue,

FYI, a page you edited, Baye McNeil, has been proposed for deletion by user Nagoyabllue, and I thought you might want to participate in the debate: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baye McNeil. I created the Baye McNeil page, going through Wikipedia articles for creation to do so - whereupon it was approved for publication by an editor. All of the references (including the cover blurbs) were looked at and considered notable enough for the article…I look forward to your thoughts on the proposed deletion…Hoping you're well...Thank you!...Minusminority (talk) 20:33, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this draft. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

[[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] · [[Special:Contribs/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

External links in the body of an article

Hello, I'm Polygnotus. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of an article. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Polygnotus (talk) 06:30, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Poly. Per Wikipedia's request for more sources, I added them as external links within the body of the "Personal life" section, but apparently you used a script to auto-remove them. Should I just move them all to "external links" and reference them with a footnote? Eido INOUE | 井上エイド 06:37, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya! We try to keep the amount of external links down, and normally, only one official link is included (see WP:ELMIN). Perhaps you can use some of them as citations?

I notice that your username is the last name of the article subject, Adrian Havill, which could be problematic, see WP:USERNAME. Hope you don't mind I'll leave you another lovely template.

Polygnotus (talk) 06:44, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like [1] doesn't mention Havill.

And [2] says that the editor is Kimberly Holmes, not Adrian Havill.

A link to Amazon to buy a book is considered a bit too promotional.

WP:GOODREADS is considered to be WP:USERGENERATED. Polygnotus (talk) 07:09, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments. Re #1, I assumed the asking for sources wanted somebody to establish that the orphanage "Jeff's Home for Boys" existed. Re #2, indeed the editor is not Adrian Havill in 2024. Unfortunately, the back archives on digital does not go back to 1961, which the article claims he was editor at the time. Like #1, I added that link to merely show its existence as a publication (dating back over a half century) as it lacks a wikipedia entry. I added the Good Reads just to provide variety of reviews or references to his works; There's Kirkus Reviews and many other large scale independent 3rd party sources (including C-SPAN and many U.S. NBC/CBS/ABC spots, but YT links not allowed) that reference the books and movies. I agree that the Amazon link should be removed. Eido INOUE | 井上エイド 07:27, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If they want to know if such a orphanage exists then they can use Google, you don't have to facilitate their lazyness.

Adam Cohen, writing for Time, called The Mother, the Son, and the Socialite a "clunky but engrossing account".

You are Adrian Havill right? Or are you his son? You can use the procedure outlined here to disclose a conflict of interest. Polygnotus (talk) 07:30, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No I am not. My wiki sig has my real name. Eido INOUE | 井上エイド 07:35, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, so you are his son. Anyway, it doesn't really matter, just follow the procedure to disclose your COI and it is fine. I have added some sources to the article. Polygnotus (talk) 07:43, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to confuse you. I assure you my legal (<-- keyword) name now (<-- keyword) is Eido Inoue, which is why I made that edit. Feel free to Google /me/ or search for me on YT if you want to know why. I would've used the handle "Inoue" if I could, but there are literally tens of millions of people with that name and all the short cool variants are already taken. ;) Eido INOUE | 井上エイド 07:51, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I figured it out, thanks. I found some new sources we might be able to use via the Wikipedia Library. Polygnotus (talk) 07:54, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TIL. Thanks for all your (very quick) help. Eido INOUE | 井上エイド 08:02, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know of any more interviews that we can add to the article? Polygnotus (talk) 07:51, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... not an interview per se... how about this one?

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biography-adrian-havill/ (looks like this Wiki was derived from that)

If you stick his name in the Washington Post's internal search engine you can get stuff going back to the early 90s. Eido INOUE | 井上エイド 07:58, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting, thank you. He also appeared ~~a bunch of times~~ on Countdown with Keith Olbermann on NBC. Polygnotus (talk) 08:19, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think you officially know more about him than I do now. I'm guessing you got that from the Wiki Library. I'm going to have to figure out how to get access to that. Thanks again. Eido INOUE | 井上エイド 08:35, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately the rules are rather strict: It can be accessed by any registered editor whose account is six months old and has 500 edits.. So far you have 162 edits. Your account was registered in 2007 (aka more than 6 months ago). Polygnotus (talk) 08:39, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And I'm guessing edits to the (talk) pages don't count. lol Oh well. Much thanks, sir. Eido INOUE | 井上エイド 08:41, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just a FYI and no need for further edits or effort if you wish, but I'm pretty sure he's never been interviewed by Keith Olbermann on NBC/MSNBC. Joe Scarborough has interviewed him on (MS)NBC though. Eido INOUE | 井上エイド 03:55, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna8895001 & https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna11727183 and he is also mentioned over at https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna6928967 And edits on your talkpage do count towards those 500 required for the Wikipedia library. Polygnotus (talk) 04:00, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New proposed entry for the page:

"On Oct. 20, 2024, Adrian Havill was admitted into the Alzheimer's and Dementia Resource Center of Central Florida and is reportedly making 'good progress'." j/k

Thanks again. I would've never found those sources on my own. Eido INOUE | 井上エイド 05:34, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I love being old. Polygnotus (talk) 07:48, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COI

Hello, Havill. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Polygnotus (talk) 06:45, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]