User:AtomCrusher

This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AtomCrusher.

Wikipedia:Babel

en

This user is a native speaker of the English language.

fr-3

Cet utilisateur peut contribuer avec un niveau avancé de français.

cy-2

Fe all y defnyddiwr 'ma gyfrannu ar lefel ganolradd y Gymraeg.

is-1

Þessi notandi hefur grundvallarkunnáttu á íslensku máli.

1337

7|-|15 |_|x0r 5|>34|<5 1337.

Search user languages

My name is Dan, and I'm currently in Wales, United Kingdom. My edits are usually on articles I stumble across, and consist roughly equally of new or updated information as well as grammatical and spelling checks and modifications.

You also might find my username as creator of quite a few vector logos and graphics. Here are a few:

Tornado alley
CHI 2018
Aeroport Nice Cote d'Azur
Williams Martini Racing

Ancestry:

Years:

Weeks to months:

Hours to days:

	Idea slyly pilfered from Picapica who plagiarized it from Grutness who lifted it from Moriori who half-inched it from Calton who nicked it from Salsb who stole it from Guettarda who borrowed it from White Cat

This user is a member of the

Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists

AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD

Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet

It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia.

This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.