User:Andrea Low/Entitativity/Bibliography

You will be compiling your bibliography and creating an outline of the changes you will make in this sandbox.

Bibliography

• Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (2003). Elements of a lay theory of groups: Types of groups, relational styles, and the perception of group entitativity. In Lay Theories and Their Role in the Perception of Social Groups (pp. 129-140). Psychology Press.
  • This is a book chapter published by an academic press, so it should be a reliable source. It reviews research on group entitativity, making it helpful in establishing notability.
• Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., Wieczorkowska, G., Lewis, A., Sherman, S. J., & Uhles, A. N. (2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of personality and social psychology, 78(2), 223.
  • This is an article in a reputable peer-reviewed journal article, making it a reliable source. It discusses different types of groups and their perceived entitativity, which is helpful for establishing notability.
• Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., & Castelli, L. (2002). A group by any other name—The role of entitativity in group perception. European review of social psychology, 12(1), 139-166.
  • This peer-reviewed journal article discusses entitativity in group perception, making it a reliable source for establishing notability.
• Crawford, M. T., Sherman, S. J., & Hamilton, D. L. (2002). Perceived entitativity, stereotype formation, and the interchangeability of group members. Journal of personality and social psychology, 83(5), 1076.
  • This is a peer-reviewed journal article, making it a reliable source. It explores the link between perceived entitativity and stereotype formation, a consequence of entitativity.
• Castano, E., Sacchi, S., & Gries, P. H. (2003). The perception of the other in international relations: Evidence for the polarizing effect of entitativity. Political psychology, 24(3), 449-468.
  • This is a peer-reviewed journal article, making it a reliable source. It examines entitativity's role in polarizing perceptions in international relations, extending the concept beyond just social groups.
• Lakens, D. (2010). Movement synchrony and perceived entitativity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 701-708.
  • This is a peer-reviewed journal article, so it should be reliable. It investigates how movement synchrony affects perceptions of entitativity, discussing an antecedent of the construct.
• Smith, R. W., Faro, D., & Burson, K. A. (2013). More for the many: The influence of entitativity on charitable giving. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 961-976.
  • This is a peer-reviewed journal article, making it a reliable source. It examines the effect of entitativity on charitable giving, contributing to the understanding of the consequences of entitativity.
• Rydell, R. J., Hugenberg, K., Ray, D., & Mackie, D. M. (2007). Implicit theories about groups and stereotyping: The role of group entitativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(4), 549-558.
  • This peer-reviewed article explores how group entitativity influences stereotyping, making it a reliable source for understanding the consequences of entitativity.
• Crawford, M. T., & Salaman, L. (2012). Entitativity, identity, and the fulfilment of psychological needs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 726-730.
  • This peer-reviewed journal article investigates the role of entitativity in fulfilling psychological needs within groups, making it a reliable source for understanding its psychological consequences.
• Rutchick, A. M., Hamilton, D. L., & Sack, J. D. (2008). Antecedents of entitativity in categorically and dynamically construed groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 905-921.
  • This peer-reviewed journal article discusses the antecedents of entitativity, which makes it notable. It is a reliable source on factors that contribute to the perception of group coherence.
• Agadullina, E. R., & Lovakov, A. V. (2018). Are people more prejudiced towards groups that are perceived as coherent? A meta‐analysis of the relationship between out‐group entitativity and prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(4), 703-731.
  • This is a peer-reviewed meta-analysis, making it a reliable source. It examines the relationship between perceived out-group entitativity and prejudice, helping establish the broader consequences of entitativity, which contributes to notability.
• Gaertner, L., & Schopler, J. (1998). Perceived ingroup entitativity and intergroup bias: An interconnection of self and others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(6), 963-980.
  • This peer-reviewed journal article explores the connection between ingroup entitativity and intergroup bias, making it a reliable source for understanding the outcomes of perceived entitativity.
• Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., Crump, S. A., & Spencer-Rodgers, J. (2009). The role of entitativity in stereotyping. Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination, 179-198.
  • This is a book chapter from a peer-reviewed volume, making it a reliable source. It covers the role of entitativity in stereotyping, contributing to the discussion of its consequences.
• Castano, E., Yzerbyt, V., Paladino, M. P., & Sacchi, S. (2002). I belong, therefore, I exist: Ingroup identification, ingroup entitativity, and ingroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(2), 135-143.
  • This peer-reviewed journal article investigates the impact of mortality salience on ingroup entitativity, identification, and bias, contributing to the understanding of antecedents of entitativity.
• Effron, D. A., & Knowles, E. D. (2015). Entitativity and intergroup bias: How belonging to a cohesive group allows people to express their prejudices. Journal of personality and social psychology, 108(2), 234.
  • This is a peer-reviewed journal article exploring the relationship between entitativity and intergroup bias, making it a reliable source for understanding a consequence of entitativity.
• Sacchi, S., Castano, E., & Brauer, M. (2009). Perceiving one's nation: Entitativity, agency and security in the international arena. International Journal of Psychology, 44(5), 321-332.
  • This peer-reviewed journal article examines the consequences of perceived national entitativity in the international context, contributing to understanding the implications of entitativity at a broader level, contributing to its notability.
• Blanchard, A. L., Caudill, L. E., & Walker, L. S. (2020). Developing an entitativity measure and distinguishing it from antecedents and outcomes within online and face-to-face groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23(1), 91-108.
  • This peer-reviewed journal article focuses on the development of an entitativity scale, providing a reliable source for measuring the construct in various group settings.
• Lakens, D., & Stel, M. (2011). If they move in sync, they must feel in sync: Movement synchrony leads to attributions of rapport and entitativity. Social Cognition, 29(1), 1-14.
  • This peer-reviewed article is a reliable source that examines movement synchrony as an antecedent of perceived entitativity.
• Sherman, S. J., Hamilton, D. L., & Lewis, A. C. (1999). Perceived entitativity and the social identity value of group memberships. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 80–110). Blackwell Publishing.
  • This chapter appears in a book by a respected academic publisher, making it a reliable source. It provides a discussion of entitativity and social identity, which contributes to the field's understanding of these key concepts, establishing its notability.
• Callahan, S. P., & Ledgerwood, A. (2016). On the psychological function of flags and logos: Group identity symbols increase perceived entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(4), 528.
  • This article is in a peer-reviewed journal, studying the role of identity symbols in enhancing perceived entitativity, and is thus a reliable and notable source.
• Denson, T. F., Lickel, B., Curtis, M., Stenstrom, D. M., & Ames, D. R. (2006). The roles of entitativity and essentiality in judgments of collective responsibility. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9(1), 43-61.
  • This peer-reviewed article provides a clear distinction between entitativity and essentiality, and it develops a reliable scale for measuring these constructs, making it a notable contribution to the study of entitativity.
• Haslam, N., Holland, E., & Karasawa, M. (2013). Essentialism and entitativity across cultures. Culture and group processes, 17-37.
  • This article in a peer-reviewed journal studies entitativity and essentialism across different cultures, adding cross-cultural perspectives to the understanding of group dynamics, enhancing its notability
• Fraune, M. R., Oisted, B. C., Sembrowski, C. E., Gates, K. A., Krupp, M. M., & Šabanović, S. (2020). Effects of robot-human versus robot-robot behavior and entitativity on anthropomorphism and willingness to interact. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 106220.
  • This peer-reviewed article extends entitativity beyond the study of human social groups to examine the entitativity of robots, making it a notable contribution to the construct of entitativity.
• Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2011). The role of need for closure in essentialist entitativity beliefs and prejudice: An epistemic needs approach to racial categorization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(1), 52-73.
  • This peer-reviewed article examines need for closure as a moderator of entitativity and its consequences, making a notable contribution to an understanding of the construct.
• Dang, J., Liu, L., Ren, D., & Su, Q. (2018). Polarization and positivity effects: Divergent roles of group entitativity in warmth and competence judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 74-84.
  • This article in a peer-reviewed journal studies how entitativity influences social judgments, further establishing the consequences of entitativity, making it notable.
• Abrams, A. M., & der Pütten, A. M. R. V. (2020). I–C–E Framework: Concepts for group dynamics research in human-robot interaction: Revisiting theory from social psychology on ingroup identification (I), cohesion (C) and entitativity (E). International Journal of Social Robotics, 12, 1213-1229.
  • This peer-reviewed article provides a theoretical framework to study the entitativity of robots, making it a notable contribution to studying non-human entitativity.
• Blondé, J., & Falomir-Pichastor, J. M. (2021). Smoker identity and resistance to antismoking campaigns: The role of group entitativity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(1), 160-176.
  • This article in a peer-reviewed article discusses the consequences of entitativity to health behaviors, providing real-world implications, making it a notable source.
• Asada, A., & Ko, Y. J. (2019). Conceptualizing relative size and entitativity of sports fan community and their roles in sport socialization. Journal of Sport Management, 33(6), 530-545.
  • This peer-reviewed article studies a consequence of entitativity: sports socialization, so it is notable for its application of the construct to real-world phenomena.
• Vanbergen, N., Irmak, C., & Sevilla, J. (2020). Product entitativity: How the presence of product replicates increases perceived and actual product efficacy. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(2), 192-214.
  • This article is published in a peer-reviewed journal, which ensures its reliability. It covers the topic of non-human entitativity in detail, establishing its notability.
• Kurebayashi, K., Hoffman, L., Ryan, C. S., & Murayama, A. (2012). Japanese and American perceptions of group entitativity and autonomy: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(2), 349-364.
  • This peer-reviewed study is reliable and provides in-depth analysis of cross-cultural perceptions of entitativity, making it a notable contribution to understanding entitativity across different cultures.
• Ommundsen, R., Yakushko, O., Van der Veer, K., & Ulleberg, P. (2013). Exploring the relationships between fear-related xenophobia, perceptions of out-group entitativity, and social contact in Norway. Psychological reports, 112(1), 109-124.
  • This article, published in a peer-reviewed journal, is reliable. It contributes notably to the understanding of entitativity in a non-American, cross-cultural context.
• Gupta, T., Chen, S., & Mohanty, S. (2024). More the merrier: Effects of plural brand names on perceived entitativity and brand attitude. Journal of Consumer Psychology.
  • Published in a peer-reviewed journal, this article is reliable and provides a detailed exploration of non-human entitativity in the context of branding, marking it as a notable contribution.
• Bernardo, F., & Palma-Oliveira, J. M. (2022). Tell me where you live… How the perceived entitativity of neighborhoods determines the formation of impressions about their residents. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 821786.
  • This article is published in a peer-reviewed journal, ensuring its reliability. It provides a thorough analysis of non-human entitativity in neighborhoods, making it notable for its applied implications on social perceptions.
• Yzerbyt, V., Judd, C. M., & Corneille, O. (2004). Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism: Introduction and overview.
  • This chapter is part of an academic book that provides an in-depth discussion on the distinctions between entitativity, variability, and essentialism. It is reliable and notable for its comprehensive theoretical contribution to these social cognition concepts.
• Adelman, L., Yogeeswaran, K., & Lickel, B. (2019). They're all the same, sometimes: Prejudicial attitudes toward Muslims influence motivated judgments of entitativity and collective responsibility for an individual's actions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 80, 31-38.
  • This peer-reviewed study is a reliable exploration of motivated judgments and entitativity. It is notable for studying how prejudice impacts collective responsibility perceptions.
• Wang, C., Hoegg, J., & Dahl, D. W. (2018). The impact of a sales team’s perceived entitativity on customer satisfaction. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46, 190-211.
  • Published in a peer-reviewed journal, this article is reliable. It is notable for its application of entitativity to marketing, specifically showing how perceived entitativity in sales teams affects customer satisfaction.
• Effron, D. A., & Knowles, E. D. (2015). Entitativity and intergroup bias: How belonging to a cohesive group allows people to express their prejudices. Journal of personality and social psychology, 108(2), 234.
  • This peer-reviewed article is reliable. Its examination of the role of entitativity in fostering intergroup bias is a notable contribution to understanding group dynamics and prejudice.
• Effron, D. A., Kakkar, H., & Cable, D. M. (2022). Consequences of perceiving organization members as a unified entity: Stronger attraction, but greater blame for member transgressions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(11), 1951.
  • This peer-reviewed study is reliable. It provides an notable exploration of how perceived entitativity can have pros and cons for organizations.
• Castano, E., Yzerbyt, V., & Bourguignon, D. (2003). We are one and I like it: The impact of ingroup entitativity on ingroup identification. European journal of social psychology, 33(6), 735-754.
  • This peer-reviewed article is reliable and notable for its specific focus on how ingroup entitativity influences ingroup identification, a core concept in social identity theory.
• Pereira, A., & van Prooijen, J. W. (2018). Why we sometimes punish the innocent: The role of group entitativity in collective punishment. PLoS One, 13(5), e0196852.
  • This peer-reviewed article is reliable and notable for its exploration of how group entitativity leads to collective punishment, offering insights into the consequences of strong group perceptions.

• Gaertner, L., & Schopler, J. (1998). Perceived ingroup entitativity and intergroup bias: An interconnection of self and others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(6), 963-980.
  • This peer-reviewed article is reliable and notable for its in-depth exploration of the connections between ingroup entitativity and intergroup bias, contributing to social identity and group theory.
• Yzerbyt, V., Castano, E., Leyens, J. P., & Paladino, M. P. (2000). The primacy of the ingroup: The interplay of entitativity and identification. European review of social psychology, 11(1), 257-295.
  • This peer-reviewed work is reliable. It provides a comprehensive analysis of how entitativity influences ingroup identification, making it a notable contribution to group dynamics research.
• Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., & Castelli, L. (2002). A group by any other name—The role of entitativity in group perception. European review of social psychology, 12(1), 139-166.
  • This is a reliable article in a peer-reviewed journal. It is notable for its discussion on how entitativity shapes group perceptions, contributing to both theoretical and applied social psychology.
• Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral science, 3(1), 14.
  • This seminal work introduces the construct of entitativity, making it a landmark study in social psychology and a highly important and reliable reference.
• Ip, W. M., Chiu, C. Y., & Wan, C. (2006). Birds of a feather and birds flocking together: physical versus behavioral cues may lead to trait-versus goal-based group perception. Journal of personality and social psychology, 90(3), 368.
  • This peer-reviewed article is reliable and notable for its exploration of how physical and behavioral cues serve as antecedents to entitativity.
• Kende, A., & McGarty, C. (2019). A model for predicting prejudice and stigma expression by understanding target perceptions: The effects of visibility, politicization, responsibility, and entitativity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(5), 839-856.
  • This peer-reviewed study is reliable and notable for its contribution to predicting prejudice and stigma by examining entitativity alongside other group characteristics.
• McGarty, C. (1999). Categorization in social psychology.
  • This book is widely regarded as a foundational text in social psychology, offering a reliable and notable analysis of categorization and group dynamics, including the concept of entitativity. Its comprehensive scope makes it notable as well.
• Brewer, M. B., Hong, Y. Y., & Li, Q. (2004). Dynamic entitativity. The psychology of group perception, 19, 19-29.
  • This academic book chapter chapter is reliable and notable for introducing the idea of dynamic entitativity, emphasizing how group unity can evolve over time rather than being static.
• Crump, S. A., Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., Lickel, B., & Thakkar, V. (2010). Group entitativity and similarity: Their differing patterns in perceptions of groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(7), 1212-1230.
  • This peer-reviewed article is reliable and notable for disentangling the roles of entitativity and similarity in group perceptions.
• Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., Crump, S. A., & Spencer-Rodgers, J. (2009). The role of entitativity in stereotyping. Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination, 179-198.
  • As a chapter in an academic handbook, this source is reliable and notable for its synthesis of research on entitativity's role in fostering stereotypes.
• Spencer-Rodgers, J., Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (2007). The central role of entitativity in stereotypes of social categories and task groups. Journal of personality and social psychology, 92(3), 369.
  • This peer-reviewed article is reliable and notable for studying the consequences of entitativity in shaping stereotypes of both social categories and task-based groups.
• Gaertner, L., Iuzzini, J., Witt, M. G., & Oriña, M. M. (2006). Us without them: evidence for an intragroup origin of positive in-group regard. Journal of personality and social psychology, 90(3), 426.
  • This peer-reviewed article is reliable and notable for examining how ingroup positivity can develop independently of outgroup negativity, contributing to the understanding of ingroup entitativity and its psychological origins.
• McConnell, A. R., Sherman, S. J., & Hamilton, D. L. (1997). Target entitativity: implications for information processing about individual and group targets. Journal of personality and social psychology, 72(4), 750.
  • This peer-reviewed study is reliable and notable for studying how perceived entitativity influences the way people process information about both individual and group targets.
• Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2002). Are essentialist beliefs associated with prejudice?. British journal of social psychology, 41(1), 87-100.
  • Published in a peer-reviewed journal, this article is reliable. It is notable for distinguishing essentialist beliefs from entitativity and provides validated scales to measure both constructs.
• Denson, T. F., Lickel, B., Curtis, M., Stenstrom, D. M., & Ames, D. R. (2006). The roles of entitativity and essentiality in judgments of collective responsibility. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9(1), 43-61.
  • This peer-reviewed article is reliable and notable for its development of scale measures related to entitativity and essentiality. It provides practical tools for measuring these constructs and examines their role in collective responsibility judgments.
• Crump, S. A., Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., Lickel, B., & Thakkar, V. (2010). Group entitativity and similarity: Their differing patterns in perceptions of groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(7), 1212-1230.
  • This peer-reviewed article explores how entitativity and (group cohesion) and similarity a, and is notable for spowing that whtion. It shows that while similarity can boost idifferent constructs. they aren't the same.
• Igarashi, T., & Kashima, Y. (2011). Perceived entitativity of social networks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1048-1058.
  • Published in a peer-reviewed journal, this article is reliable and notable for its focus on entitativity within social networks. It expands the concept of entitativity to more fluid and dynamic groupings.
• Rutchick, A. M., Hamilton, D. L., & Sack, J. D. (2008). Antecedents of entitativity in categorically and dynamically construed groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 905-921.
  • This peer-reviewed article is reliable and notable for exploring the antecedents of entitativity in both static and dynamic groups. It provides valuable insights into how group entitativity forms.
• Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological review, 103(2), 336.

Edit this section to compile the bibliography for your Wikipedia assignment. Add the name and/or notes about what each source covers, then use the "Cite" button to generate the citation for that source.

Outline of proposed changes

1. Definition and Origins of Entitativity

Defining entitativity in social psychology.

• Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral science, 3(1), 14.
• Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (2003). Elements of a lay theory of groups: Types of groups, relational styles, and the perception of group entitativity. In Lay Theories and Their Role in the Perception of Social Groups (pp. 129-140). Psychology Press.
• Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., Wieczorkowska, G., Lewis, A., Sherman, S. J., & Uhles, A. N. (2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of personality and social psychology, 78(2), 223.
• McGarty, C. (1999). Categorization in social psychology.
• Brewer, M. B., Hong, Y. Y., & Li, Q. (2004). Dynamic entitativity. The psychology of group perception, 19, 19-29.
• Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological review, 103(2), 336.

2. Distinguishing Entitativity from Related Constructs

These references focus on distinguishing entitativity from similar constructs, such as similarity, coherence and essentialism.

• Haslam, N., Holland, E., & Karasawa, M. (2013). Essentialism and entitativity across cultures. In Culture and group processes (pp. 17-37).
• Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2002). Are essentialist beliefs associated with prejudice?. British journal of social psychology, 41(1), 87-100.
• Yzerbyt, V., Judd, C. M., & Corneille, O. (2004). Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism: Introduction and overview.
• Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2011). The role of need for closure in essentialist entitativity beliefs and prejudice: An epistemic needs approach to racial categorization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(1), 52-73.
• Sherman, S. J., Hamilton, D. L., & Lewis, A. C. (1999). Perceived entitativity and the social identity value of group memberships. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 80–110). Blackwell Publishing.
• Denson, T. F., Lickel, B., Curtis, M., Stenstrom, D. M., & Ames, D. R. (2006). The roles of entitativity and essentiality in judgments of collective responsibility. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9(1), 43-61.
• Crump, S. A., Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., Lickel, B., & Thakkar, V. (2010). Group entitativity and similarity: Their differing patterns in perceptions of groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(7), 1212-1230.

3. Antecedents of Entitativity

These references focus on factors that contribute to the perception of a group as an entity, such as similarity, synchrony, and common goals.

• Callahan, S. P., & Ledgerwood, A. (2016). On the psychological function of flags and logos: Group identity symbols increase perceived entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(4), 528.
• Rutchick, A. M., Hamilton, D. L., & Sack, J. D. (2008). Antecedents of entitativity in categorically and dynamically construed groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 905-921.
• Lakens, D. (2010). Movement synchrony and perceived entitativity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 701-708.
• Lakens, D., & Stel, M. (2011). If they move in sync, they must feel in sync: Movement synchrony leads to attributions of rapport and entitativity. Social Cognition, 29(1), 1-14.
• Ip, W. M., Chiu, C. Y., & Wan, C. (2006). Birds of a feather and birds flocking together: Physical versus behavioral cues may lead to trait-versus goal-based group perception. Journal of personality and social psychology, 90(3), 368.
• Dasgupta, N., Banaji, M. R., & Abelson, R. P. (1999). Group entitativity and group perception: associations between physical features and psychological judgment. Journal of personality and social psychology, 77(5), 991.
• Castano, E., Yzerbyt, V., Paladino, M. P., & Sacchi, S. (2002). I belong, therefore, I exist: Ingroup identification, ingroup entitativity, and ingroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(2), 135-143.
• Adelman, L., Yogeeswaran, K., & Lickel, B. (2019). They're all the same, sometimes: Prejudicial attitudes toward Muslims influence motivated judgments of entitativity and collective responsibility for an individual's actions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 80, 31-38.
• Gaertner, L., Iuzzini, J., Witt, M. G., & Oriña, M. M. (2006). Us without them: evidence for an intragroup origin of positive in-group regard. Journal of personality and social psychology, 90(3), 426.
• Igarashi, T., & Kashima, Y. (2011). Perceived entitativity of social networks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1048-1058.

4. Outcomes of Entitativity at Various Levels

These references cover the effects of entitativity, including group cohesion, stereotyping, and prejudice, at different levels such as group, nation, and individual.

A. Group-Level Outcomes

• Agadullina, E. R., & Lovakov, A. V. (2018). Are people more prejudiced towards groups that are perceived as coherent? A meta‐analysis of the relationship between out‐group entitativity and prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(4), 703-731.
• Crawford, M. T., Sherman, S. J., & Hamilton, D. L. (2002). Perceived entitativity, stereotype formation, and the interchangeability of group members. Journal of personality and social psychology, 83(5), 1076.
• Effron, D. A., & Knowles, E. D. (2015). Entitativity and intergroup bias: How belonging to a cohesive group allows people to express their prejudices. Journal of personality and social psychology, 108(2), 234.
• Gaertner, L., & Schopler, J. (1998). Perceived ingroup entitativity and intergroup bias: An interconnection of self and others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(6), 963-980.
• Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., & Castelli, L. (2002). A group by any other name—The role of entitativity in group perception. European review of social psychology, 12(1), 139-166.
• Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., Crump, S. A., & Spencer-Rodgers, J. (2009). The role of entitativity in stereotyping. Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination, 179-198.
• Rydell, R. J., Hugenberg, K., Ray, D., & Mackie, D. M. (2007). Implicit theories about groups and stereotyping: The role of group entitativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(4), 549-558.
• Dang, J., Liu, L., Ren, D., & Su, Q. (2018). Polarization and positivity effects: Divergent roles of group entitativity in warmth and competence judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 74-84.
• Pereira, A., & van Prooijen, J. W. (2018). Why we sometimes punish the innocent: The role of group entitativity in collective punishment. PLoS One, 13(5), e0196852.
• Kende, A., & McGarty, C. (2019). A model for predicting prejudice and stigma expression by understanding target perceptions: The effects of visibility, politicization, responsibility, and entitativity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(5), 839-856.
• Spencer-Rodgers, J., Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (2007). The central role of entitativity in stereotypes of social categories and task groups. Journal of personality and social psychology, 92(3), 369.

B. National/International Effects

• Condor, S. (2006). Temporality and collectivity: Diversity, history and the rhetorical construction of national entitativity. British journal of social psychology, 45(4), 657-682.
• Sacchi, S., Castano, E., & Brauer, M. (2009). Perceiving one's nation: Entitativity, agency and security in the international arena. International Journal of Psychology, 44(5), 321-332.
• Castano, E., Sacchi, S., & Gries, P. H. (2003). The perception of the other in international relations: Evidence for the polarizing effect of entitativity. Political psychology, 24(3), 449-468.

C. Individual and Psychological Outcomes

• Crawford, M. T., & Salaman, L. (2012). Entitativity, identity, and the fulfilment of psychological needs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 726-730.
• Castano, E., Yzerbyt, V., & Bourguignon, D. (2003). We are one and I like it: The impact of ingroup entitativity on ingroup identification. European journal of social psychology, 33(6), 735-754.
• McConnell, A. R., Sherman, S. J., & Hamilton, D. L. (1997). Target entitativity: implications for information processing about individual and group targets. Journal of personality and social psychology, 72(4), 750.

D. Behavioral Outcomes

• Smith, R. W., Faro, D., & Burson, K. A. (2013). More for the many: The influence of entitativity on charitable giving. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 961-976.
• Blondé, J., & Falomir-Pichastor, J. M. (2021). Smoker identity and resistance to antismoking campaigns: The role of group entitativity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(1), 160-176.
• Asada, A., & Ko, Y. J. (2019). Conceptualizing relative size and entitativity of sports fan community and their roles in sport socialization. Journal of Sport Management, 33(6), 530-545.
• Wang, C., Hoegg, J., & Dahl, D. W. (2018). The impact of a sales team’s perceived entitativity on customer satisfaction. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46, 190-211.
• Effron, D. A., Kakkar, H., & Cable, D. M. (2022). Consequences of perceiving organization members as a unified entity: Stronger attraction, but greater blame for member transgressions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(11), 1951.

5. Moderators of Entitativity

These references focus on the factors that moderate the relationship between entitativity and its effects, such as context, group type, and individual characteristics.

A. Individual Differences

• Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2011). The role of need for closure in essentialist entitativity beliefs and prejudice: An epistemic needs approach to racial categorization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(1), 52-73.

B. Entitativity Across Cultures

• Haslam, N., Holland, E., & Karasawa, M. (2013). Essentialism and entitativity across cultures. Culture and group processes, 17-37.
• Kurebayashi, K., Hoffman, L., Ryan, C. S., & Murayama, A. (2012). Japanese and American perceptions of group entitativity and autonomy: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(2), 349-364.
• Ommundsen, R., Yakushko, O., Van der Veer, K., & Ulleberg, P. (2013). Exploring the relationships between fear-related xenophobia, perceptions of out-group entitativity, and social contact in Norway. Psychological reports, 112(1), 109-124.

6. Measurement of Entitativity

These references discuss how entitativity is measured and distinguish it from related constructs such as essentialism.

• Blanchard, A. L., Caudill, L. E., & Walker, L. S. (2020). Developing an entitativity measure and distinguishing it from antecedents and outcomes within online and face-to-face groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23(1), 91-108.
• Yzerbyt, V., Judd, C. M., & Corneille, O. (2004). Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism: Introduction and overview.
• Sherman, S. J., Hamilton, D. L., & Lewis, A. C. (1999). Perceived entitativity and the social identity value of group memberships.

7. Non-Human Entitativity

These references explore how the concept of entitativity is applied to non-human groups, such as products, brands, or robots.

• Fraune, M. R., Oisted, B. C., Sembrowski, C. E., Gates, K. A., Krupp, M. M., & Šabanović, S. (2020). Effects of robot-human versus robot-robot behavior and entitativity on anthropomorphism and willingness to interact. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 106220.
• Vanbergen, N., Irmak, C., & Sevilla, J. (2020). Product entitativity: How the presence of product replicates increases perceived and actual product efficacy. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(2), 192-214.
• Gupta, T., Chen, S., & Mohanty, S. (2024). More the merrier: Effects of plural brand names on perceived entitativity and brand attitude. Journal of Consumer Psychology.
• Abrams, A. M., & der Pütten, A. M. R. V. (2020). I–C–E Framework: Concepts for group dynamics research in human-robot interaction: Revisiting theory from social psychology on ingroup identification (I), cohesion (C) and entitativity (E). International Journal of Social Robotics, 12, 1213-1229.
• Bernardo, F., & Palma-Oliveira, J. M. (2022). Tell me where you live… How the perceived entitativity of neighborhoods determines the formation of impressions about their residents. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 821786.