Jump to content

German submarine U-864

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Unterseeboot 864)

History
Nazi Germany
NameU-864
Ordered5 June 1941
BuilderDeSchiMAG AG Weser, Bremen
Yard number1070
Laid down15 October 1942
Launched12 August 1943
Commissioned9 December 1943
FateSunk with all hands on 9 February 1945 by HMS Venturer, North Sea west of Bergen
General characteristics
Class and typeType IXD2 submarine
Displacement
  • 1,610 t (1,580 long tons) surfaced
  • 1,799 t (1,771 long tons) submerged
Length
Beam
  • 7.50 m (24 ft 7 in) o/a
  • 4.40 m (14 ft 5 in) pressure hull
Height10.20 m (33 ft 6 in)
Draught5.35 m (17 ft 7 in)
Propulsion
  • 9,000 PS (8,900 shp; 6,600 kW) surfaced
  • 1,000 PS (990 shp; 740 kW) submerged
Speed
  • 20.8 kn (38.5 km/h; 23.9 mph) surfaced
  • 6.9 kn (12.8 km/h; 7.9 mph) submerged
Range
  • 12,750 nmi (23,610 km; 14,670 mi) at 10 kn (19 km/h; 12 mph) surfaced
  • 57 nmi (106 km; 66 mi) at 4 kn (7.4 km/h; 4.6 mph) submerged
Test depthCalculated crush depth: 230 m (754 ft 7 in)
Boats & landing
craft carried
2 dinghies
Complement55–63 officers & ratings
Armament
Service record
Part of:
Identification codes: M 54 842
Commanders:
  • K.Kapt. Ralf-Reimar Wolfram
  • 9 December 1943 – 9 February 1945
Operations:
  • 1 patrol:
  • 7 – 9 February 1945
Victories: None

German submarine U-864 was a Type IXD2 U-boat of Nazi Germany's Kriegsmarine in World War II. On 9 February 1945, she became the only submarine in history to be sunk by an enemy submarine while both were submerged. U-864 was sunk by the British submarine HMS Venturer, and all 73 men on board died.

Design

[edit]

German Type IXD2 submarines were considerably larger than the original Type IXs. U-864 had a displacement of 1,610 t (1,580 long tons) when at the surface and 1,799 t (1,771 long tons) while submerged.[1] The U-boat had a total length of 87.58 m (287 ft 4 in), a pressure hull length of 68.50 m (224 ft 9 in), a beam of 7.50 m (24 ft 7 in), a height of 10.20 m (33 ft 6 in), and a draught of 5.35 m (17 ft 7 in). The submarine was powered by two MAN M 9 V 40/46 supercharged four-stroke, nine-cylinder diesel engines plus two MWM RS34.5S six-cylinder four-stroke diesel engines for cruising, producing a total of 9,000 PS (6,620 kW; 8,880 shp) for use while surfaced, two Siemens-Schuckert 2 GU 345/34 double-acting electric motors producing a total of 1,000 shp (1,010 PS; 750 kW) for use while submerged. She had two shafts and two 1.85 m (6 ft) propellers. The boat was capable of operating at depths of up to 200 m (660 ft).[1]

The submarine had a maximum surface speed of 20.8 kn (38.5 km/h; 23.9 mph) and a maximum submerged speed of 6.9 kn (12.8 km/h; 7.9 mph).[1] When submerged, the boat could operate for 121 nmi (224 km; 139 mi) at 2 kn (3.7 km/h; 2.3 mph); when surfaced, she could travel 12,750 nmi (23,610 km; 14,670 mi) at 10 kn (19 km/h; 12 mph). U-864 was fitted with six 53.3 cm (21 in) torpedo tubes (four fitted at the bow and two at the stern), 24 torpedoes, one 10.5 cm (4.13 in) SK C/32 naval gun, 150 rounds, and a 3.7 cm (1.5 in) Flak M42 with 2575 rounds as well as two 2 cm (0.79 in) C/30 anti-aircraft guns with 8100 rounds. The boat had a complement of fifty-five.[1]

Service history

[edit]

Early career

[edit]

Commanded throughout her entire career by Korvettenkapitän Ralf-Reimar Wolfram,[2] she served with the 4th U-boat Flotilla undergoing crew training from her commissioning until 31 October 1944. She was then reassigned to the 33rd U-boat Flotilla.[3]

Final voyage

[edit]

According to decrypted intercepts of German naval communications with Japan, U-864's mission was to transport military equipment to Japan destined for the Japanese military industry, a mission code-named Operation Caesar. The cargo included approximately 67 short tons (61 t) of metallic mercury in 1,857 32 kg (71 lb) steel flasks stored in her keel. That the mercury was contained in steel canisters was confirmed when one of the canisters containing mercury was located and brought to the surface during surveys of her wreck in 2005. Approximately 1,500 short tons (1,400 t) of mercury was purchased by the Japanese from Italy between 1942 and Italy's surrender in September 1943. This had the highest priority for submarine shipment to Japan and was used in the manufacture of explosives, especially primers.

There was some speculation as to whether U-864 was carrying uranium oxide, as was the U-234, which surrendered to the US Navy in the Atlantic on 15 May 1945, but Det Norske Veritas (DNV) concluded that there was no evidence that uranium oxide was on board U-864 when she departed Bergen. During the Norwegian Coastal Administration's investigation of the wreck of U-864 in 2005, radiation measurements were made but no traces of uranium oxide were found.[4]

According to her cargo list, U-864 also carried parts and engineering drawings for German jet fighter aircraft and other military supplies for Japan, while among her passengers were Messerschmitt engineers Rolf von Chlingensperg and Riclef Schomerus, Japanese torpedo expert Tadao Yamoto, and Japanese fuel expert Toshio Nakai.[4]

The U-864, commanded by Wolfram, left Kiel on 5 December 1944, arriving at Horten Naval Base, Norway four days later. Before leaving Germany, U-864 had been refitted with a snorkel mast. Several messages found in the Ultra archives show that there were problems with the snorkel, which needed repairs before the U-864 put to sea for her voyage to Japan. All Schnorkel trials and training were conducted at Horten near Oslo. U-864 would have needed to be certified ready to sail at Horten before proceeding to Bergen.[4]

While en route to Bergen, U-864 ran aground and had to stop in Farsund for repairs, not arriving in Bergen until 5 January 1945. While docked in the Bruno U-boat pens, U-864 received minor damage on 12 January when the pens and shipping in the harbour were attacked by 32 Royal Air Force Lancaster bombers and one Mosquito bomber of 9 and 617 Squadrons. At least one Tallboy bomb penetrated the roof of the bunker causing severe damage inside, and left one of the seven pens unusable for the remainder of the war.[5][6]

Sinking

[edit]

After repairs and adjustments to her snorkel were completed U-864 commenced submerged trials but German radio transmissions regarding her whereabouts had been decrypted and British submarine HMS Venturer was sent from the British submarine base at Lerwick to intercept.

On 6 February, U-864 passed the Fedje area without being detected but after one of her engines began to misfire, she was ordered to return to Bergen where an escort would be provided at Hellisøy. On 9 February, Venturer detected U-864's diesel engine noise using her hydrophone as she was refraining from using active sonar (ASDIC) to avoid disclosing her position and later spotted the U-boat's snorkel.

In a long engagement and in a situation for which neither crew had been trained, Venturer waited 45 minutes after making contact before going to action stations. Recognising they were being followed and that their escort had still not arrived, U-864 began zig-zagging. After three hours, Venturer fired all four bow torpedo tubes at the U-boat's predicted position, beginning at 12:12, at 17-second intervals and at variable depths, then dived deeper to avoid retaliation. U-864 heard the torpedoes coming and also dived deeper and turned away. She managed to evade the first three but steered into the path of the fourth and imploded, split in two and sank with all hands, coming to rest in over 150 m (490 ft) of water, 2 nmi (3.7 km; 2.3 mi) West of Fedje.[4]

The battle between U-864 and HMS Venturer was the subject of a highly fictionalized version in the comic book "Le dernier secret d'Hitler" by Mathieu Mariolle, Fabio Piacentini and Massimo Travaglini.

Rediscovery

[edit]

The shipwreck was located in March 2003 by the Royal Norwegian Navy two nautical miles (3.7 km; 2.3 mi) west of the island of Fedje in the North Sea, at 150 m (490 ft).[7] The mercury had been seeping out of rusted containers, contaminating the region and sea life.[8] One study recommended entombing the wreck under a layer of sand as well as gravel and concrete. The Norwegian government instead awarded a contract to a salvage company to raise the wreck; however, the proposed operation was put on hold pending additional studies.

It was the Royal Norwegian Navy minesweeper KNM Tyr, alerted by local fishermen, that found the wreck.[9] An expedition to gather more detail by sonar mapping of the seafloor was mounted in October 2003.[10] The wreck was in two major sections, fore and aft, with the center section missing, including the conning tower. Further analysis was performed with a remotely operated underwater vehicle in August 2005, locating an additional 107 pieces of vessel debris in the area, likely parts of the exploded center section.[10] The mercury, contained in 1,857 rusting steel bottles located down in the vessel's keel, was found to be leaking out and poses a severe environmental threat of mercury poisoning.[8]

So far four kilograms (8.8 lb) per year of mercury is leaking into the surrounding environment, resulting in high levels of contamination in cod, cusk and edible crab around the wreck.[11] Boating and fishing near the wreck has been prohibited. Although attempts using robotic vehicles to dig into the half-buried keel were abandoned after the unstable wreck shifted, one of the steel bottles was recovered. Its original five-millimetre (0.20 in) thick wall was found to have corroded badly, leaving in places a one mm (0.039 in) thickness of steel.[12]

The delicate condition of the 2,400-ton wreck, the rusting mercury bottles, and the live torpedoes on board would make a lifting operation extremely dangerous, with significant potential for an environmental catastrophe.[12][13] A three-year study by the Norwegian Coastal Administration has recommended entombing the wreck in a 12 m (39 ft) thickness of sand, with a reinforcing layer of gravel or concrete to prevent erosion. This is being proposed as a permanent solution to the problem, and the proposal notes that similar techniques have been successfully used around 30 times to contain mercury-contaminated sites over the past 20 years.[14]

Environmental protection

[edit]

The fragmented wreck contains 67 tonnes of toxic liquid mercury. Over time part of the toxic metal had spread over an area of 30,000 square metres (7.4 acres).

The 2007 proposal to entomb the wreck rather than removing it was criticised by locals concerned about possible future leakage.[15]

On 11 November 2008, the Norwegian Coastal Administration awarded the contract for the possible salvage of the U-864 submarine and her cargo of mercury to salvage company Mammoet Salvage BV. Mammoet, which was awarded the contract for the salvage of the Russian nuclear submarine Kursk in 2001, had proposed a method of raising U-864's wreck which would satisfy the environmental requirements, described as "a safe and innovative salvage solution". This was reported to be a safe, fully remotely controlled operation which would raise the submarine and remove the source of pollution without the need for anyone working under water. On 29 January 2009, the Norwegian government approved the proposed method of raising the wreck, and the operation was scheduled to begin in 2010.[16][17] The operation was estimated to cost 1 billion kroner (US$153 million).[18] However, the operation was postponed after the government asked for additional studies.[19]

In the spring of 2016, the Norwegian Coastal Administration installed a counter fill on the slope under the bow section of U-864 in order to stabilize the seabed. The operation involved laying approximately 100 000 cubic meters of sand and rock in a controlled and precise manner from a specially designed ship. The result was reduced risk of movement by unconsolidated sediments, including contaminated materials, during seaquakes.[20][21]

In October 2018 the Norwegian Coastal Administration decided that the wreck of U-864 would be entombed after all by capping her in clean fill on the seabed where she lay. Establishing that the counter fill in 2016 was a similar operation as capping, the government decided that capping could be carried out with proven technology and with minimum spreading of contaminated sediments.[22] In 2024, authorities decided to retrieve the accessible parts of the mercury in 2026, before capping the rest.[23]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d Gröner 1991, pp. 74–75.
  2. ^ "U864". U864 Homepage. Archived from the original on 4 September 2007. Retrieved 6 February 2007.
  3. ^ "U-864". Uboat.net. Retrieved 14 January 2007.
  4. ^ a b c d "Salvage of U864 – Supplementary Studies – Study No. 7: Cargo" (PDF). Det Norske Veritas Report No. 23916. Det Norske Veritas. 4 July 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 March 2009.
  5. ^ "Royal Air Force Bomber Command 60th Anniversary, Campaign Diary, January 1945". Royal Air Force, UK Ministry of Defence. Archived from the original on 11 June 2007. Retrieved 26 January 2007.
  6. ^ "The Bases in Norway, Bergen". U-boat.net. Retrieved 26 January 2007.
  7. ^ "U-864: Extended investigations 2006". Norwegian Coastal Administration press release. Archived from the original on 18 August 2006. Retrieved 14 January 2007.
  8. ^ a b Olsvik, PA; Brattås, M; Lie, KK; Goksøyr, A. (April 2011). "Transcriptional responses in juvenile Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) after exposure to mercury-contaminated sediments obtained near the wreck of the German WW2 submarine U-864, and from Bergen Harbor, Western Norway". Chemosphere. 83 (4): 552–63. Bibcode:2011Chmsp..83..552O. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.12.019. PMID 21195448.
  9. ^ "U-864: Extended investigations 2006". Norwegian Coastal Administration. 2006. Archived from the original on 18 August 2006. Retrieved 23 November 2011.
  10. ^ a b "Vurdering og anbefaling av videre miljøtiltak ved vraket av U-864" (PDF). Recommendation for further action, U-864 phase 1 (in Norwegian). Norwegian Coastal Administration. 20 January 2006. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 September 2006. Retrieved 23 November 2011. (Translation: Assessment and recommendation of further environmental initiatives by the wreck of U-864.)
  11. ^ "NCA recommends covering wrecked mercury-submarine outside Bergen". Friends of the Earth Norway. Archived from the original on 27 October 2007. Retrieved 14 January 2007.
  12. ^ a b Martin Fletcher (19 December 2006). "Toxic time bomb surfaces 60 years after U-boat lost duel to the death". The Times. London. Archived from the original on 21 August 2008. Retrieved 14 January 2007.
  13. ^ Doug Mellgren (20 December 2006). "Sub Poses Environmental Threat in Norway". Associated Press report on Washington Post website.
  14. ^ "The Norwegian Coastal Administration recommends encasing and covering the wreck of the submarine U-864" (PDF). Norwegian Coastal Administration press release. 19 December 2006. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 July 2007. Retrieved 14 January 2007.
  15. ^ Alan Cowell and Walter Gibbs (11 January 2007). "Nazi U-Boat Imperils Norwegians Decades After the War". The New York Times. Retrieved 17 August 2008.
  16. ^ "U-864 skal heves". Aftenposten. Bergens Tidende. 29 January 2009. Archived from the original on 29 June 2011. Retrieved 30 January 2009.
  17. ^ "Sunken WW2 submarine to be raised". The Norway Post. Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation. 30 January 2009. Archived from the original on 21 November 2016. Retrieved 30 January 2009.
  18. ^ "Norway to raise toxic Nazi submarine wreck". The Local\. Agence France-Presse. 30 January 2009. Retrieved 31 January 2009.
  19. ^ "U-864: Salvage operation postponed". Global Adventures, LLC. 15 March 2010. Archived from the original on 4 August 2010. Retrieved 26 July 2010.
  20. ^ "Norway deals with dangerous WWII submarine wreck off Fedje". 25 January 2017.
  21. ^ "Maritime Journal | Submarine wreck entombed".
  22. ^ "Environmental solution for the shipwreck of the WW II submarine U-864". 15 October 2018.
  23. ^ "Regjeringen: Vurderer om kvikksølvet i nazi-ubåten ved Fedje kan fjernes". Tu.no (in Norwegian). Teknisk Ukeblad. 13 May 2024.

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]