Jump to content

Transient ischemic attack

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Transient ischemic attacks)
"TIA" redirects here. For other uses, see TIA (disambiguation).
Transient ischemic attack
Other namesMini-stroke, mild stroke
SpecialtyNeurology, Vascular surgery
PrognosisSurvival rate ~ 91% (to hospital discharge) 67.2% (five years)[1]

A transient ischemic attack (TIA), commonly known as a mini-stroke, is a minor stroke whose noticeable symptoms usually end in less than an hour. A TIA causes the same symptoms associated with a stroke, such as weakness or numbness on one side of the body, sudden dimming or loss of vision, difficulty speaking or understanding language, slurred speech, or confusion.

All forms of stroke, including a TIA, result from a disruption in blood flow to the central nervous system. A TIA is caused by a temporary disruption in blood flow to the brain, or cerebral blood flow (CBF). The primary difference between a major stroke and the TIA's minor stroke is how much tissue death (infarction) can be detected afterwards through medical imaging. While a TIA must by definition be associated with symptoms, strokes can also be asymptomatic or silent. In a silent stroke, also known as a silent cerebral infarct (SCI), there is permanent infarction detectable on imaging, but there are no immediately observable symptoms. The same person can have major strokes, minor strokes, and silent strokes, in any order.[2]

The occurrence of a TIA is a risk factor for having a major stroke, and many people with TIA have a major stroke within 48 hours of the TIA.[3][4] All forms of stroke are associated with increased risk of death or disability. Recognition that a TIA has occurred is an opportunity to start treatment, including medications and lifestyle changes, to prevent future strokes.

Signs and symptoms

[edit]

Signs and symptoms of TIA are widely variable and can mimic other neurologic conditions, making the clinical context and physical exam crucial in ruling in or out the diagnosis. The most common presenting symptoms of TIA are focal neurologic deficits, which can include, but are not limited to:[5]

Numbness or weakness generally occur on the opposite side of the body from the affected hemisphere of the brain.

A detailed neurologic exam, including a thorough cranial nerve exam, is important to identify these findings and to differentiate them from mimickers of TIA. Symptoms such as unilateral weakness, amaurosis fugax, and double vision have higher odds of representing TIA compared to memory loss, headache, and blurred vision.[7] Below is a table of symptoms at presentation, and what percentage of the time they are seen in TIAs versus conditions that mimic TIA. In general, focal deficits make TIA more likely, but the absence of focal findings do not exclude the diagnosis and further evaluation may be warranted if clinical suspicion for TIA is high (see "Diagnosis" section below).[8]

TIA vis-à-vis mimics

[edit]
Symptoms[8] % TIA mimics[8] % TIAs[8]
Unilateral paresis 29.1 58
Memory loss/cognitive impairment 18 to 26 2 to 12
Headache 14.6 to 23 2 to 36
Blurred vision 21.8 5.2
Dysarthria 12.7 20.6
Hemianopsia 3.6 3.6
Transient monocular blindness 0 6
Diplopia 0 4.8

Non-focal symptoms such as amnesia, confusion, incoordination of limbs, unusual cortical visual symptoms (such as isolated bilateral blindness or bilateral positive visual phenomena), headaches and transient loss of consciousness are usually not associated with TIA,[6] however patient assessment is still needed. Public awareness on the need to seek a medical assessment for these non-focal symptoms is also low, and can result in a delay by patients to seek treatment[9]

Symptoms of TIAs can last on the order of minutes to one–two hours, but occasionally may last for a longer period of time.[10][3] TIAs used to be defined as ischemic events in the brain that last less than 24 hours, but given the variation in duration of symptoms, this definition holds less significance.[3] A pooled study of 808 patients with TIAs from 10 hospitals showed that 60% lasted less than one hour, 71% lasted less than two hours, and 14% lasted greater than six hours.[11] Importantly, patients with symptoms that last more than one hour are more likely to have permanent neurologic damage, making prompt diagnosis and treatment important to maximize recovery.[3]

Cause

[edit]

The most common underlying pathology leading to TIA and stroke is a cardiac condition called atrial fibrillation, where poor coordination of contraction may lead to a formation of a clot in the atrial chamber that can become dislodged and travel to a cerebral artery.[12][13] Unlike in stroke, the blood flow can become restored prior to infarction which leads to the resolution of neurologic symptoms.[5][12] Another common culprit of TIA is an atherosclerotic plaque located in the common carotid artery, typically by the bifurcation between the internal and external carotids, that becomes an embolism to the brain vasculature similar to the clot in the prior example.[12][13] A portion of the plaque can become dislodged and lead to embolic pathology in the cerebral vessels.[12]

In-situ thrombosis, an obstruction that forms directly in the cerebral vasculature unlike the remote embolism previously mentioned, is another vascular occurrence with possible presentation as TIA.[12] Also, carotid stenosis secondary to atherosclerosis narrowing the diameter of the lumen and thus limiting blood flow is another common cause of TIA.[12] Individuals with carotid stenosis may present with TIA symptoms, thus labeled symptomatic, while others may not experience symptoms and be asymptomatic.[5][12][13]

Risk factors

[edit]

Risk factors associated with TIA are categorized as modifiable or non-modifiable. Non-modifiable risk factors include age greater than 55, sex, family history, genetics, and race/ethnicity.[12][14] Modifiable risk factors include cigarette smoking, hypertension (elevated blood pressure), diabetes, hyperlipidemia, level of carotid artery stenosis (asymptomatic or symptomatic) and activity level.[12][13][14] The modifiable risk factors are commonly targeted in treatment options to attempt to minimize risk of TIA and stroke.[3][12][13]

Pathogenesis

[edit]

There are three major mechanisms of ischemia in the brain: embolism traveling to the brain, in situ thrombotic occlusion in the intracranial vessels supplying the parenchyma of the brain, and stenosis of vessels leading to poor perfusion secondary to flow-limiting diameter.[12][13] Globally, the vessel most commonly affected is the middle cerebral artery.[12] Embolisms can originate from multiple parts of the body.

Common mechanisms of stroke and TIA:[12]

Stroke mechanism Frequency Pattern of infarcts Number of infarcts
In situ thrombotic occlusion Uncommon Large subcortical; Sometimes with borderzone; Rarely, whole territory; Sometimes enlarging Single
Artery to artery embolism Common Small cortical and subcortical Multiple
Impaired clearance of emboli Common Small, scattered, alongside the borderzone region Multiple
Branch occlusive disease Common Small subcortical, lacune-like Single
Hemodynamic Uncommon Borderzone; may be without lesion Multiple; None

Diagnosis

[edit]

The initial clinical evaluation of a suspected TIA involves obtaining a history and physical exam (including a neurological exam).[6] History taking includes defining the symptoms and looking for mimicking symptoms as described above. Bystanders can be very helpful in describing the symptoms and giving details about when they started and how long they lasted. The time course (onset, duration, and resolution), precipitating events, and risk factors are particularly important.

The definition, and therefore the diagnosis, has changed over time. TIA was classically based on duration of neurological symptoms. The current widely accepted definition is called "tissue-based" because it is based on imaging, not time. The American Heart Association and the American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) now define TIA as a brief episode of neurological dysfunction with a vascular cause, with clinical symptoms typically lasting less than one hour, and without evidence of significant infarction on imaging.[3]

Laboratory workup

[edit]

Laboratory tests should focus on ruling out metabolic conditions that may mimic TIA (e.g. hypoglycemia causing altered mental status), in addition to further evaluating a patient's risk factors for ischemic events. All patients should receive a complete blood count with platelet count, blood glucose, basic metabolic panel, prothrombin time/international normalized ratio, and activated partial thromboplastin time as part of their initial workup.[15] These tests help with screening for bleeding or hypercoagulable conditions. Other lab tests, such as a full hypercoagulable state workup or serum drug screening, should be considered based on the clinical situation and factors, such as age of the patient and family history.[8] A fasting lipid panel is also appropriate to thoroughly evaluate the patient's risk for atherosclerotic disease and ischemic events in the future.[8] Other lab tests may be indicated based on the history and presentation; such as obtaining inflammatory markers (erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein) to evaluate for giant cell arteritis (which can mimic a TIA) in those presenting with headaches and monocular blindness.[6]

Cardiac rhythm monitoring

[edit]

An electrocardiogram is necessary to rule out abnormal heart rhythms, such as atrial fibrillation, that can predispose patients to clot formation and embolic events.[15] Hospitalized patients should be placed on heart rhythm telemetry, which is a continuous form of monitoring that can detect abnormal heart rhythms.[6] Prolonged heart rhythm monitoring (such as with a Holter monitor or implantable heart monitoring) can be considered to rule out arrhythmias like paroxysmal atrial fibrillation that may lead to clot formation and TIAs, however this should be considered if other causes of TIA have not been found.[8][3]

Imaging

[edit]

According to guidelines from the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association Stroke Council, patients with TIA should have head imaging "within 24 hours of symptom onset, preferably with magnetic resonance imaging, including diffusion sequences".[3] MRI is a better imaging modality for TIA than computed tomography (CT), as it is better able to pick up both new and old ischemic lesions than CT. CT, however, is more widely available and can be used particularly to rule out intracranial hemorrhage.[8] Diffusion sequences can help further localize the area of ischemia and can serve as prognostic indicators.[15] Presence of ischemic lesions on diffusion weighted imaging has been correlated with a higher risk of stroke after a TIA.[16]

Vessels in the head and neck may also be evaluated to look for atherosclerotic lesions that may benefit from interventions, such as carotid endarterectomy. The vasculature can be evaluated through the following imaging modalities: magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), CT angiography (CTA), and carotid ultrasonography/transcranial doppler ultrasonography.[3] Carotid ultrasonography is often used to screen for carotid artery stenosis, as it is more readily available, is noninvasive, and does not expose the person being evaluated to radiation. However, all of the above imaging methods have variable sensitivities and specificities, making it important to supplement one of the imaging methods with another to help confirm the diagnosis (for example: screen for the disease with ultrasonography, and confirm with CTA).[17] Confirming a diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis is important because the treatment for this condition, carotid endarterectomy, can pose significant risk to the patient, including heart attacks and strokes after the procedure.[17] For this reason, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) "recommends against screening for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis in the general adult population".[17] This recommendation is for asymptomatic patients, so it does not necessarily apply to patients with TIAs as these may in fact be a symptom of underlying carotid artery disease (see "Causes and Pathogenesis" above). Therefore, patients who have had a TIA may opt to have a discussion with their clinician about the risks and benefits of screening for carotid artery stenosis, including the risks of surgical treatment of this condition.

Cardiac imaging can be performed if head and neck imaging do not reveal a vascular cause for the patient's TIA (such as atherosclerosis of the carotid artery or other major vessels of the head and neck). Echocardiography can be performed to identify patent foramen ovale (PFO), valvular stenosis, and atherosclerosis of the aortic arch that could be sources of clots causing TIAs, with transesophageal echocardiography being more sensitive than transthoracic echocardiography in identifying these lesions.[3]

Differential diagnosis

[edit]
Diagnosis[8] Findings[8]
Brain tumor Severe unilateral headache with nausea and vomiting
Central nervous system infection (e.g., meningitis, encephalitis) Fever, headache, confusion, neck stiffness, nausea, vomiting, photophobia, change in mental status
Falls/trauma Headache, confusion, bruising
Hypoglycemia Confusion, weakness, diaphoresis
Migraines Severe headaches with or without photophobia, younger age
Multiple sclerosis Diplopia, limb weakness, paresthesia, urinary retention, optic neuritis
Seizure disorder Confusion with or without loss of consciousness, urinary incontinence, tongue biting, tonic-clonic movements
Subarachnoid hemorrhage Severe headache with sudden onset and photophobia
Vertigo (central or peripheral) Generalized dizziness and diaphoresis with or without hearing loss

Prevention

[edit]

Although there is a lack of robust studies demonstrating the efficacy of lifestyle changes in preventing TIA, many medical professionals recommend them.[18] These include:

  • Avoiding smoking
  • Cutting down on fats to help reduce the amount of plaque buildup
  • Eating a healthy diet including plenty of fruits and vegetables
  • Limiting sodium in the diet, thereby reducing blood pressure
  • Exercising regularly
  • Moderating intake of alcohol, stimulants, sympathomimetics, etc.
  • Maintaining a healthy weight

In addition, it is important to control any underlying medical conditions that may increase the risk of stroke or TIA, including:[18]

  • Hypertension
  • High cholesterol
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Atrial fibrillation

Treatment

[edit]

By definition, TIAs are transient, self-resolving, and do not cause permanent impairment. However, they are associated with an increased risk of subsequent ischemic strokes, which can be permanently disabling.[19] Therefore, management centers on the prevention of future ischemic strokes and addressing any modifiable risk factors. The optimal regimen depends on the underlying cause of the TIA.

Lifestyle modification

[edit]

Lifestyle changes have not been shown to reduce the risk of stroke after TIA.[20] While no studies have looked at the optimal diet for secondary prevention of stroke, some observational studies have shown that a Mediterranean diet can reduce stroke risk in patients without cerebrovascular disease.[21] A Mediterranean diet is rich in fruits, vegetables and whole grains, and limited in red meats and sweets. Vitamin supplementation has not been found to be useful in secondary stroke prevention.[21]

Antiplatelet medications

[edit]

The antiplatelet medications, aspirin and clopidogrel, are both recommended for secondary prevention of stroke after high-risk TIAs.[22][21][23] The clopidogrel can generally be stopped after 10 to 21 days.[23] An exception is TIAs due to blood clots originating from the heart, in which case anticoagulants are generally recommended.[21] After TIA or minor stroke, aspirin therapy has been shown to reduce the short-term risk of recurrent stroke by 60–70%, and the long-term risk of stroke by 13%.[24]

The typical therapy may include aspirin alone, a combination of aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole, or clopidogrel alone.[21] Clopidogrel and aspirin have similar efficacies and side effect profiles. Clopidogrel is more expensive and has a slightly decreased risk of GI bleed.[21] Another antiplatelet, ticlopidine, is rarely used due to increased side effects.[21]

Anticoagulant medications

[edit]

Anticoagulants may be started if the TIA is thought to be attributable to atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation is an abnormal heart rhythm that may cause the formation of blood clots that can travel to the brain, resulting in TIAs or ischemic strokes. Atrial fibrillation increases stroke risk by five times, and is thought to cause 10-12% of all ischemic strokes in the US.[21][25] Anticoagulant therapy can decrease the relative risk of ischemic stroke in those with atrial fibrillation by 67%[26] Warfarin is a common anticoagulant used, but direct acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as apixaban, have been shown to be equally effective while also conferring a lower risk of bleeding.[25][27] Generally, anticoagulants and antiplatelets are not used in combination, as they result in increased bleeding risk without a decrease in stroke risk.[21] However, combined antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy may be warranted if the patient has symptomatic coronary artery disease in addition to atrial fibrillation.

Sometimes, myocardial infarction ("heart attack") may lead to the formation of a blood clot in one of the chambers of the heart. If this is thought to be the cause of the TIA, people may be temporarily treated with warfarin or other anticoagulant to decrease the risk of future stroke.[21]

Blood pressure control

[edit]

Blood pressure control may be indicated after TIA to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke. About 70% of patients with recent ischemic stroke are found to have hypertension, defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) > 140 mmHg, or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > 90 mmHg.[21] Until the first half of the 2010s, blood pressure goals have generally been SBP < 140 mmHg and DBP < 90 mmHg.[21] However, newer studies suggest that a goal of SBP <130 mmHg may confer even greater benefit.[28][29] Blood pressure control is often achieved using diuretics or a combination of diuretics and angiotensin converter enzyme inhibitors, although the optimal treatment regimen depends on the individual.[21]

Studies that evaluated the application of blood pressure‐lowering drugs in people who had a TIA or stroke, concluded that this type of medication helps to reduce the possibility of a recurrent stroke, of a major vascular event and dementia.[30] The effects achieved in stroke recurrence were mainly obtained through the ingestion of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or a diuretic.[30]

Cholesterol control

[edit]

There is inconsistent evidence regarding the effect of LDL-cholesterol levels on stroke risk after TIA. Elevated cholesterol may increase ischemic stroke risk while decreasing the risk of hemorrhagic stroke.[31][32][33] While its role in stroke prevention is currently unclear, statin therapy has been shown to reduce all-cause mortality and may be recommended after TIA.[21]

Diabetes control

[edit]

Diabetes mellitus increases the risk of ischemic stroke by 1.5–3.7 times, and may account for at least 8% of first ischemic strokes.[21] While intensive glucose control can prevent certain complications of diabetes such as kidney damage and retinal damage, there has previously been little evidence that it decreases the risk of stroke or death.[34] However, data from 2017 suggests that metformin, pioglitazone and semaglutide may reduce stroke risk.[34]

Surgery

[edit]

If the TIA affects an area that is supplied by the carotid arteries, a carotid ultrasound scan may demonstrate stenosis, or narrowing, of the carotid artery. For people with extra-cranial carotid stenosis, if 70-99% of the carotid artery is clogged, carotid endarterectomy can decrease the five-year risk of ischemic stroke by approximately half.[35] For those with extra-cranial stenosis between 50 and 69%, carotid endarterectomy decreases the 5-year risk of ischemic stroke by about 16%.[35] For those with extra-cranial stenosis less than 50%, carotid endarterectomy does not reduce stroke risk and may, in some cases, increase it.[35] The effectiveness of carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting in reducing stroke risk in people with intra-cranial carotid artery stenosis is currently unknown.[21]

In carotid endarterectomy, a surgeon makes an incision in the neck, opens up the carotid artery, and removes the plaque occluding the blood vessel. The artery may then be repaired by adding a graft from another vessel in the body, or a woven patch. In patients who undergo carotid endarterectomy after a TIA or minor stroke, the 30-day risk of death or stroke is 7%.[35]

Carotid artery stenting is a less invasive alternative to carotid endarterectomy for people with extra-cranial carotid artery stenosis. In this procedure, the surgeon makes a small cut in the groin and threads a small flexible tube, called a catheter, into the patient's carotid artery. A balloon is inflated at the site of stenosis, opening up the clogged artery to allow for increased blood flow to the brain. To keep the vessel open, a small wire mesh coil, called a stent, may be inflated along with the balloon. The stent remains in place, and the balloon is removed.

For people with symptomatic carotid stenosis, carotid endarterectomy is associated with fewer perioperative deaths or strokes than carotid artery stenting.[36] Following the procedure, there is no difference in effectiveness if you compare carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting procedures, however, endarterectomy is often the procedure of choice as it is a safer procedure and is often effective in the longer term for preventing recurrent stroke.[36] For people with asymptomatic carotid stenosis, the increased risk of stroke or death during the stenting procedure compared to an endarterectomy is less certain.[36]

People who undergo carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting for stroke prevention are medically managed with antiplatelets, statins, and other interventions as well.[21]

Prognosis

[edit]

Without treatment, the risk of an ischemic stroke in the three months after a TIA is about 20% with the greatest risk occurring within two days of the TIA.[6] Other sources cite that 10% of TIAs will develop into a stroke within 90 days, half of which will occur in the first two days following the TIA.[37] Treatment and preventative measures after a TIA (for example treating elevated blood pressure) can reduce the subsequent risk of an ischemic stroke by about 80%.[6] The risk of a stroke occurring after a TIA can be predicted using the ABCD² score. One limitation of the ABCD² score is that it does not reliably predict the level of carotid artery stenosis, which is a major cause of stroke in TIA patients. The patient's age is the most reliable risk factor in predicting any level of carotid stenosis in transient ischemic attack.[38] The ABCD2 score is no longer recommended for triage (to decide between outpatient management versus hospital admission) of those with a suspected TIA due to these limitations.[6]

Epidemiology

[edit]

With the difficulty in diagnosing a TIA due to its nonspecific symptoms of neurologic dysfunction at presentation and a differential including many mimics, the exact incidence of the disease is unclear. It is currently estimated to have an incidence of approximately 200,000 to 500,000 cases per year in the US according to the American Heart Association.[3] TIA incidence trends similarly to stroke, such that incidence varies with age, gender, and different race/ethnicity populations.[3][39][5] Associated risk factors include age greater than or equal to 60, blood pressure greater than or equal to 140 systolic or 90 diastolic, and comorbid diseases, such as diabetes, hypertension, atherosclerosis, and atrial fibrillation. It is thought that approximately 15 to 30 percent of strokes have a preceding TIA episode associated.[5][8][40]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Gattellari M, Goumas C, Garden F, Worthington JM (January 2012). "Relative survival after transient ischaemic attack: results from the Program of Research Informing Stroke Management (PRISM) study". Stroke. 43 (1): 79–85. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.636233. PMID 22076008. S2CID 16722015.
  2. ^ Coutts SB, Hill MD, Simon JE, Sohn CH, Scott JN, Demchuk AM (August 2005). "Silent ischemia in minor stroke and TIA patients identified on MR imaging". Neurology. 65 (4): 513–517. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000169031.39264.ff. PMID 16116107. S2CID 24762370.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Easton JD, Saver JL, Albers GW, Alberts MJ, Chaturvedi S, Feldmann E, et al. (June 2009). "Definition and evaluation of transient ischemic attack: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; and the Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this statement as an educational tool for neurologists". Stroke. 40 (6): 2276–2293. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.192218. PMID 19423857.
  4. ^ Ferro JM, Falcão I, Rodrigues G, Canhão P, Melo TP, Oliveira V, et al. (December 1996). "Diagnosis of transient ischemic attack by the nonneurologist. A validation study". Stroke. 27 (12): 2225–2229. doi:10.1161/01.str.27.12.2225. PMID 8969785.
  5. ^ a b c d e Panuganti KK, Tadi P, Lui K (2020). "Transient Ischemic Attack". StatPearls. StatPearls. PMID 29083778.
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Amarenco P (May 2020). "Transient Ischemic Attack". The New England Journal of Medicine. 382 (20): 1933–1941. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp1908837. PMID 32402163. S2CID 218635760.
  7. ^ Amort M, Fluri F, Schäfer J, Weisskopf F, Katan M, Burow A, et al. (2011). "Transient ischemic attack versus transient ischemic attack mimics: frequency, clinical characteristics and outcome" (PDF). Cerebrovascular Diseases. 32 (1): 57–64. doi:10.1159/000327034. PMID 21613786. S2CID 43769238.
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Simmons BB, Cirignano B, Gadegbeku AB (September 2012). "Transient ischemic attack: Part I. Diagnosis and evaluation". American Family Physician. 86 (6): 521–526. PMID 23062043.
  9. ^ Butler, Sonia & Crowfoot, Gary & Quain, Debbie & Davey, Andrew & Magin, Parker & Maguire, Jane. (2017). "Opening the Door to Funny Turns: A Constructivist Thematic Analysis of Patient Narratives after TIA". Public Health Research. 7. 62–72.
  10. ^ "Transient Ischemic Attack". Archived from the original on 2019-01-13. Retrieved 2017-12-10.
  11. ^ Shah SH, Saver JL, Kidwell CS, Albers GW, Rothwell PM, Ay H, Koroshetz WJ, Inatomi Y, Uchino M, Demchuk AM, Coutts SB, Purroy F, Alvarez-Sabin JS, Sander D, Sander K, Restrepo L, Wityk RJ, Marx JJ, Easton JD (2007). "A multicenter pooled, patient-level data analysis of diffusion-weighted MRI in TIA patients". Stroke. 38 (2): 463. S2CID 78309677. in "Abstracts From the 2007 International Stroke Conference". Stroke. 38 (2): 453–607. February 2007. doi:10.1161/str.38.2.453.
  12. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Smith WS, Johnston SC, Hemphill III JC (2019). "Cerebrovascular Diseases". In Jameson JL, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Longo DL, Loscalzo J (eds.). Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine (20th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  13. ^ a b c d e f Wong KS, Caplan LR, Kim JS (2017). "Stroke Mechanisms". Intracranial Atherosclerosis: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Treatment. Frontiers of Neurology and Neuroscience. Vol. 40. pp. 58–71. doi:10.1159/000448302. ISBN 978-3-318-02758-7. PMID 27960181.
  14. ^ a b Boehme AK, Esenwa C, Elkind MS (February 2017). "Stroke Risk Factors, Genetics, and Prevention". Circulation Research. 120 (3): 472–495. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308398. PMC 5321635. PMID 28154098.
  15. ^ a b c Adams HP, del Zoppo G, Alberts MJ, Bhatt DL, Brass L, Furlan A, et al. (May 2007). "Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists". Stroke. 38 (5): 1655–1711. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.181486. PMID 17431204.
  16. ^ Redgrave JN, Coutts SB, Schulz UG, Briley D, Rothwell PM (May 2007). "Systematic review of associations between the presence of acute ischemic lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging and clinical predictors of early stroke risk after transient ischemic attack". Stroke. 38 (5): 1482–1488. doi:10.1161/strokeaha.106.477380. PMID 17379821.
  17. ^ a b c "Final Recommendation Statement: Carotid Artery Stenosis: Screening". United States Preventive Services Taskforce. 8 July 2014.
  18. ^ a b "Transient ischaemic attack (TIA) - Prevention - NHS Choices". Nhs.uk. 2014-10-15. Retrieved 2015-08-19.
  19. ^ Mohan KM, Wolfe CD, Rudd AG, Heuschmann PU, Kolominsky-Rabas PL, Grieve AP (May 2011). "Risk and cumulative risk of stroke recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis". Stroke. 42 (5): 1489–1494. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.602615. PMID 21454819. S2CID 18230964.
  20. ^ Lawrence M, Pringle J, Kerr S, Booth J, Govan L, Roberts NJ (20 March 2015). "Multimodal secondary prevention behavioral interventions for TIA and stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis". PLOS ONE. 10 (3): e0120902. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1020902L. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120902. PMC 4368743. PMID 25793643.
  21. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Kernan WN, Ovbiagele B, Black HR, Bravata DM, Chimowitz MI, Ezekowitz MD, et al. (July 2014). "Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association". Stroke. 45 (7): 2160–2236. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000024. PMID 24788967.
  22. ^ "Preventing Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation - Evidence Update for Clinicians | PCORI". www.pcori.org. 2020-02-13. Retrieved 2024-09-09.
  23. ^ a b Hao Q, Tampi M, O'Donnell M, Foroutan F, Siemieniuk RA, Guyatt G (December 2018). "Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone for acute minor ischaemic stroke or high risk transient ischaemic attack: systematic review and meta-analysis". BMJ. 363: k5108. doi:10.1136/bmj.k5108. PMC 6298178. PMID 30563866.
  24. ^ Rothwell PM, Algra A, Chen Z, Diener HC, Norrving B, Mehta Z (July 2016). "Effects of aspirin on risk and severity of early recurrent stroke after transient ischaemic attack and ischaemic stroke: time-course analysis of randomised trials". Lancet. 388 (10042): 365–375. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30468-8. PMC 5321490. PMID 27209146.
  25. ^ a b López-López JA, Sterne JA, Thom HH, Higgins JP, Hingorani AD, Okoli GN, et al. (November 2017). "Oral anticoagulants for prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation: systematic review, network meta-analysis, and cost effectiveness analysis". BMJ. 359: j5058. doi:10.1136/bmj.j5058. PMC 5704695. PMID 29183961.
  26. ^ Shoamanesh A, Charidimou A, Sharma M, Hart RG (December 2017). "Should Patients With Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack With Atrial Fibrillation and Microbleeds Be Anticoagulated?". Stroke. 48 (12): 3408–3412. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018467. PMID 29114097. S2CID 3831870.
  27. ^ Proietti M, Romanazzi I, Romiti GF, Farcomeni A, Lip GY (January 2018). "Real-World Use of Apixaban for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis". Stroke. 49 (1): 98–106. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018395. hdl:2434/748104. PMID 29167388. S2CID 204046043.
  28. ^ Reboussin DM, Allen NB, Griswold ME, Guallar E, Hong Y, Lackland DT, et al. (May 2018). "Systematic Review for the 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines". Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 71 (19): 2176–2198. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.004. PMC 8654280. PMID 29146534.
  29. ^ Katsanos AH, Filippatou A, Manios E, Deftereos S, Parissis J, Frogoudaki A, et al. (January 2017). "Blood Pressure Reduction and Secondary Stroke Prevention: A Systematic Review and Metaregression Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials". Hypertension. 69 (1): 171–179. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.08485. PMID 27802419. S2CID 42869560.
  30. ^ a b Zonneveld TP, Richard E, Vergouwen MD, Nederkoorn PJ, de Haan R, Roos YB, Kruyt ND (July 2018). "Blood pressure-lowering treatment for preventing recurrent stroke, major vascular events, and dementia in patients with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 7 (8): CD007858. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007858.pub2. PMC 6513249. PMID 30024023.
  31. ^ Manktelow BN, Potter JF (July 2009). "Interventions in the management of serum lipids for preventing stroke recurrence". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2019 (3): CD002091. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002091.pub2. PMC 6664829. PMID 19588332.
  32. ^ Cheng SF, Brown MM (March 2017). "Contemporary medical therapies of atherosclerotic carotid artery disease". Seminars in Vascular Surgery. 30 (1): 8–16. doi:10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2017.04.005. PMID 28818261.
  33. ^ O'Regan C, Wu P, Arora P, Perri D, Mills EJ (January 2008). "Statin therapy in stroke prevention: a meta-analysis involving 121,000 patients". The American Journal of Medicine. 121 (1): 24–33. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.06.033. PMID 18187070.
  34. ^ a b Castilla-Guerra L, Fernandez-Moreno MD, Leon-Jimenez D, Carmona-Nimo E (February 2018). "Antidiabetic drugs and stroke risk. Current evidence". European Journal of Internal Medicine. 48: 1–5. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2017.09.019. PMID 28939005.
  35. ^ a b c d Rerkasem A, Orrapin S, Howard DP, Rerkasem K (September 2020). "Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020 (9): CD001081. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001081.pub4. PMC 8536099. PMID 32918282. S2CID 221636994.
  36. ^ a b c Müller, Mandy D.; Lyrer, Philippe; Brown, Martin M.; Bonati, Leo H. (2020). "Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020 (2): CD000515. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000515.pub5. ISSN 1469-493X. PMC 7041119. PMID 32096559.
  37. ^ "What is TIA?". Stroke.org. Retrieved 2015-08-19.
  38. ^ Mannu GS, Kyu MM, Bettencourt-Silva JH, Loke YK, Clark AB, Metcalf AK, et al. (September 2015). "Age but not ABCD(2) score predicts any level of carotid stenosis in either symptomatic or asymptomatic side in transient ischaemic attack". International Journal of Clinical Practice. 69 (9): 948–956. doi:10.1111/ijcp.12637. PMID 25832133. S2CID 24197113.
  39. ^ Ramirez L, Kim-Tenser MA, Sanossian N, Cen S, Wen G, He S, et al. (September 2016). "Trends in Transient Ischemic Attack Hospitalizations in the United States". Journal of the American Heart Association. 5 (9): e004026. doi:10.1161/jaha.116.004026. PMC 5079046. PMID 27664805.
  40. ^ Wheatley MA, Ross MA (August 2017). "Care of Neurologic Conditions in an Observation Unit". Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America. 35 (3): 603–623. doi:10.1016/j.emc.2017.03.007. PMID 28711127.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transient_ischemic_attack&oldid=1248734704"