Template talk:Welcomeh

This template is in the collection of greetings templates maintained by the Welcoming Committee. For other templates in the collection, see Welcome templates.

IP version

{{Welcomeh}} is my preferred welcome templates, but I use {{WelcomeIP}} for anon users. So I've created a version of the former, with the additional content from the IP template: {{WelcomeIPh}}. Will someone check it, please? Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 19:06, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mixed up simple_pedia and en_pedia

Mixed 'em up. Rolled back. —Waterfox (talk) 15:55, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Linking to the Teahouse on the welcome template

Hi everyone. Those of us involved at the Teahouse pilot are interested in seeing a link to the Teahouse placed in this welcome template. This will be able to help us drive new editor traffic to the Teahouse during this pilot period, and allow us to continue to assess the pilot to the best of our ability. The welcome template is a great and powerful tool for new users, and it'd be really valuable to give new editors the choice to visit the Teahouse for assistance and community experience. I do hope that you will support this. Thank you for your consideration :) Sarah (talk) 23:58, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See discussion on Template talk:Welcome. KillerChihuahua^?!? 22:26, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Broken?

Hasn't anyone noticed that this template looks broken? This is what it originally looked like. The next edit, it was substituted for {{Welcomeg}} which also looks broken (it looked ok here, but has been messed up since the following edit). It's lower half is lopsided to the right. I just noticed it the other day, so I suppose it's not used often. I always use {{w-graphical}} (or {{w-graphical-anon}} for IP users). Anyway, this template could use a tune up. - wolf 18:15, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed See here. FYI - wolf 08:34, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated link

"Pages needing attention" under "Things to do" currently links to Wikipedia:Pages needing attention, which is marked as outdated and recommends using Category:Articles needing attention instead. This seems like a no-brainer but I'm new and this template is substituted by at least one bot I'm aware of so I thought I should check here first. Is there a reason not to change it? Qb42 (talk) 04:45, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I didn't realize that the link is inherited from Template:Welcomeg, I have asked on that talk page instead. Qb42 (talk) 19:56, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]