Template talk:USStatute

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles

United States: Government

	United States portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
	This template is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government.

U.S. Congress

	United States portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
	This template has not yet been assigned a subject. The options are: "Person", "People", "Place", "Thing", or "Events".

Linked dates

MOS:UNLINKDATES states, "The linking of dates purely for the purpose of autoformatting is now deprecated." This is as of August 24, 2008. I agree that it has some problems, and I agree with the policy as generally applied. However, I believe an exception should be made for this template.

All US Statutes can be properly described in an American format: MMMM DD, YYYY.
All US Statutes can be properly described in the Gregorian calendar.
Without linked dates, ALL the dates will look bad: "(False Claims Act Amendments of 1986 (Pub.L. 99-562, 100 Stat. 3153, enacted 1986-10-27)"
The (many) readers who don't have dates-preference set won't be hurt by linking, they won't be affected at all.
The few readers with the dates-preference will be helped.

Until this is resolved, it should remain linked.—Markles 10:34, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed my mind.—Markles 10:45, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Date templates

Would it not be better to use one of the date templates, such as {{date}} or {{start date}}? They also emit microformat tags extending the usefullness of this template. Int21h (talk) 04:05, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]