Template talk:Stereochemistry

Confusing topic

The template is named "stereochemistry", but about half of the "Configuration descriptors" sets are constitutional not stereochemical, which is consistent with the defintion at Descriptor (chemistry). Should this template be re-named "chemical configurations" so that it matches the scope of the contents? DMacks (talk) 05:07, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I created this navbox, just using the basic lists in stereochemistry. I have no opninion on this rename suggestion, I'm not that familiar with the topic. Maybe there could be more clarification for half-laymen like me? -DePiep (talk) 05:28, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]