Template talk:Amtrak Silver Meteor
Appearance
(Redirected from Template talk:Silver Meteor)
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
References error
[edit]This template includes <ref>...</ref>
tags; since there is usually no <references />
tag after it, the error Cite error: <ref>
tags exist, but no <references />
tag was found is shown.
One way to fix this would be to add {{reflist}} at the end of the template so the reference shows.
--—— Gadget850 (Ed) talk - 15:09, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Where would you put something like this on a railroad line template? ----DanTD (talk) 16:03, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Concerned editors will have to decide how to fix this; I am responding to a request for help from Help talk:Cite errors. Possible fixes:
- If the reference is to be useful, you need to show it at some point. --—— Gadget850 (Ed) talk - 17:14, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- I just tried that, and it didn't work. Meanwhile, somebody else put an empty reference chapter on Orlando (Amtrak station), and that didn't work either. ----DanTD (talk) 20:32, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Your edit to the template seems to have fixed it. --—— Gadget850 (Ed) talk - 22:17, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- What a surprise, you're right. I suppose it simply took some time to take effect. ----DanTD (talk) 04:56, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- Your edit to the template seems to have fixed it. --—— Gadget850 (Ed) talk - 22:17, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- I just tried that, and it didn't work. Meanwhile, somebody else put an empty reference chapter on Orlando (Amtrak station), and that didn't work either. ----DanTD (talk) 20:32, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- The reason was that you need to null-edit an article for a change in a template to take effect. Anyway, please see Help talk:Cite errors where I will address the problem of broken refs in templates in general. Debresser (talk) 21:57, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
"Improved diagram"
[edit]What I've done is show:
- Whether or not the station has disabled access;
- Indicate almost all water crossings;
- Indicate whether the line/station is elevated, at-grade, or in a tunnel;
- Indicate whether a border is crossed over water on a bridge, through a tunnel, or at-grade (no water), and;
- Show connecting services stations at stations, no matter how minor they may be.
If you think that I have gone a little overboard on the bridges, I sympathize with you! Much time has gone into this makeover for the diagram. I'm not sure if I will continue to improve it further, but for now, I am publishing it here.
Ben (talk) 23:38, 13 July 2013 (UTC)