Template talk:SVG upscale

Template wording

@Jonteemil and IagoQnsi: The wording of the template should be improved. First, the older versions shouldn't be deleted since they also fit the requirement. Second, the first sentence is confusing. Could one of you reword it? Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 13:16, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DatGuy: Well, the older versions should be deleted since they should be tagged with {{orfurrev}}. What is confusing with the first sentence?Jonteemil (talk) 15:28, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonteemil: My mistake with the first part. I'd say few things: 1. SVG should either be uppercase everywhere or lowercase everywhere. 2. The 'but' part is confusing. In my opinion you could link to NFCC in the bold 'slightly larger' part. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 16:16, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DatGuy: 1. Where is svg uppercase? 2. Can you perhaps give us an example of how you would like it to be?Jonteemil (talk) 16:39, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DatGuy: I've now made some changes. Since one may not only want non-free SVGs to be upscaled I've made the template work with both free and non-free files. Non-free is the default and free can be activated by writing {{SVG upscale|free=yes}}. Just letting you know since your bot I guess have to recognize the new name of the template. Also {{orfurrev}} should therefor not be used if free=yes.Jonteemil (talk) 00:23, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if this messes with the code you've written btw. I figured that it'd be better to do it before than after the task has been approved though.Jonteemil (talk) 00:38, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonteemil: Perhaps non-free and free files could be in different categories? Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 13:17, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DatGuy: That could be done. I'm thinking that DatBot should upscale the free files as much as the non-free files though so I don't know how much difference it makes?Jonteemil (talk) 13:22, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's more so that I can separate the files that need to be tagged with {{Orphaned non-free revisions}} and which ones shouldn't. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 13:29, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DatGuy: I see. Can't you make the bot recognize free=yes? If not, I will fix the categorization.Jonteemil (talk) 13:47, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've simplified the syntax so free=yes is replaced by 1=free.Jonteemil (talk) 20:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonteemil: I could, but making it a separate category would be much more efficient. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 12:58, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DatGuy: Okay, I have now made the files go into Category:Wikipedia non-free SVG upscale requests and Category:Wikipedia free SVG upscale requests respectively. Can @JJMC89: move Category:Wikipedia SVG upscale requests to Category:Wikipedia non-free SVG upscale requests? I've created Category:Wikipedia free SVG upscale requests.Jonteemil (talk) 17:28, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moved — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:29, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]