Template talk:R from manufacturer's designation

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Redirect, a collaborative effort to improve the standard of redirects and their categorization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Note: This banner should be placed on the talk pages of project, template and category pages that exist and operate to maintain redirects.
This banner is not designed to be placed on the talk pages of most redirects and almost never on the talk pages of mainspace redirects. For more information see the template documentation.RedirectWikipedia:WikiProject RedirectTemplate:WikiProject Redirectredirect pages

'military designation' → 'main designation'

My original example was admittedly not the best one, but I think there is a case for slightly broadening the meaning of this category to include non-military items. There are quite a few redirects to civilian aircraft, if not vehicles, that could well be described as R from manufacturer's designation, for example the ones redirecting to the main commercial name of the Cessna Citation family members: Cessna 500, Cessna 560 etc. Otherwise what category should they be put in? R from civilian manufacturer's designation or similar seems just redundant. --Deeday-UK (talk) 22:38, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, Deeday-UK, it's now easier to see what you meant. My only continuing concern is that "main" seems to be a very vague term. Is there a better term than "main" that can be used to describe the redirects' designations? If not, then "main" needs to be given a specific definition at least in the documentation, isn't that so? Painius 07:10, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would specify it as main military or commercial designation, possibly using official or most common instead of main. That would cover the broader meaning I had in mind. It could be further tweaked in future, if needed. --Deeday-UK (talk) 09:00, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since I'm no expert, we should ask the template's creator, The Bushranger, to see if there were other intentions and such. Painius 22:03, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you mean User:The Bushranger. --Deeday-UK (talk) 22:34, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you! and oddly enough that's how this works for me sometimes – I make a faux pas that leads me to improvements of both Bushranger (disambiguation) and The Bushranger (disambiguation). Ain't WP grand? Painius 19:06, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The way you just worded it, Deeday-UK: This is a redirect from a manufacturer's designation to a more common military or commercial designation of an aircraft, vehicle, or other item. appears to be the best so far. Painius 19:38, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And, belatedly - yes, that was about my intent for it. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:46, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]