Template talk:R from journal
Appearance
(Redirected from Template talk:R from journal/doc)
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Note: Any changes made to this template's content needs to be checked as workable in the tables on the references which include it directly: |
"Journal" or "Journal article"?
[edit]The text of this template refers to a "journal article", ie a paper in a journal, perhaps a single scientific breakthrough. I think this is confusing. The redirects in Category:Redirects from journals are all titles of journals, as you would expect, rather than individual "journal articles".
Could we amend this template to clarify it?
At present it displays:
- This is a redirect from a trade or professional journal article to a more general, relevant Wikipedia article, such as the author or publisher of the article or to the title in an alternative language.
- Journal articles should only have an individual article when they meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines and there is enough material to warrant a detailed article.
I suggest we should modify this to (my changes bolded):
- This is a redirect from a trade or professional journal title to a more general, relevant Wikipedia article, such as the author or publisher of the journal or to the title in an alternative language.
- (Or, more simply, just omit "article" or "title": This is a redirect from a trade or professional journal to a more general, relevant Wikipedia article...
- Journals should only have an individual article when they meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines and there is enough material to warrant a detailed article.
Any thoughts? I'll mention this at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Academic Journals, as the venue for folk interested in journals. PamD 10:07, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Why not let it be a redirect for both? --awkwafaba (📥) 13:08, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support the last option. --Randykitty (talk) 13:34, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support the last one. ― Qwerfjkltalk 17:22, 10 March 2022 (UTC)