Template talk:Periodic table (32 columns, micro)/elementcell
Appearance
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Semi-protected edit request on 18 August 2021
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change:
margin:-1px;
to:
box-sizing: border-box;
reason:
better and more consistent rendering of the marked element at a variety of zoom levels 108.246.204.20 (talk) 20:22, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- We'll have to sandbox this. Will
|answered=pause
your request. OK? -DePiep (talk) 20:35, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- We'll have to sandbox this. Will
- Which test situations would you like to see? Template:Periodic table (32 columns, micro)/testcases -DePiep (talk) 20:42, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- Looks better, because the border is *within* the cell. Now, in which situations (which browser?) did you see bad effects? (With me, 1 test + 1 mobile view test, the zooming is OK in both testcase situations. What does your check say? -DePiep (talk) 21:00, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- I use Chrome on Windows 7, and the border was not consistently within the visible region. However, I can no longer see any difference, probably due to a recent browser update. box-sizing is arguably still the more "correct" way to do this, but as I no longer see a difference, it's become an academic matter. 108.246.204.20 (talk) 12:49, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
- Your propsal has been implemented [1]. So, a good thing and allright you don't see the issuer any more. Or am I missing something? -DePiep (talk) 13:17, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
- I use Chrome on Windows 7, and the border was not consistently within the visible region. However, I can no longer see any difference, probably due to a recent browser update. box-sizing is arguably still the more "correct" way to do this, but as I no longer see a difference, it's become an academic matter. 108.246.204.20 (talk) 12:49, 25 September 2021 (UTC)