Template talk:Move review talk

This template (Template:Mrv) was considered for merging with Template:MRVdiscuss on 2013 June 22. The result of the discussion was "not merged".

Days at Template:MRVdiscuss

I think you might have figured it out by now, but days is a partial hack around for the fact that #time does not recognize that "YYYY Month Day" format used by template. It only excepts dates in the format supported by php's strtotime function. It does handle YYYY Month though, and by adding days it treats the date as adding that many days from the start of the month. Which is why the template currently bugs on the last day of the month. Hmm I wonder what would happen if minutes got used instead {{#time:Y M|2013 January 31 minutes}} yields "2013 Jan", vs {{#time:Y M|2013 January 31 days}} which yields "2013 Feb". Going to switch it to minutes. PaleAqua (talk) 02:43, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I moved this here from my talk page so that anyone wondering why "minutes" is there can check here for the answer. Wbm1058 (talk) 16:40, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is bonkers. Can we get a bot to go round and write all these dates in a proper format? In the meantime I've requested someone write a lua module to convert this properly. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:30, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Using {{replace|{{{date}}}| |-}} replaces the spaces with dashes which then lets #time interpret the dates correctly. I've updated the template accordingly. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is listed, or was listed with result

I think this template should say “is” while the review is active, and “was” after there is a result. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:05, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seems reasonable. Should the wording be further tweaked though, the "on <date>" might need to be changed as well. Something like this feels a bit awkward "This discussion is listed at Wikipedia:Move review on <date>", maybe change "on" to "from" while active also? PaleAqua (talk) 18:02, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]