Template talk:Infobox London station

This template is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles

Trains: Stations / in UK / in London

	Trains Portal

	London Transport Portal

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This template is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This template is supported by WikiProject UK Railways.
	This template is supported by WikiProject London Transport.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Nomination for deletion of Template:DLRexits2012

Template:DLRexits2012 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:11, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Collapsible sections

Is there any possibility that the statistical sections (railexits, railints, tubeexits & dlrbats) could be presented in a collapsible section? They consume a lot of space when inserted into a page and these detailed statistics are of little interest to the average reader. Given that many railway station articles are light on textual content, this can cause unnecessary layout problems and preclude the addition of relevant images into the article.

A collapsible section could be headed "Usage statistics", and its collapse state could be optional, giving editors the freedom to adjust the presentation to suit articles on a case-by-case basis. Thanks. Cnbrb (talk) 08:12, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:COLLAPSE. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:38, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I read MOS:COLLAPSE before posting this and it doesn't preclude my suggested solution. "Auto-collapsing is often a feature of navboxes. A few infoboxes also use pre-collapsed sections for infrequently accessed details." Cnbrb (talk) 17:28, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mapframe?

I can't see how to use mapframe with this template (as per {{infobox station}}). Mapframe provides far more flexible mapping than the traditional static crop from openstreetmap, which seems to have been largely abandoned elsewhere. Have I missed something? 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 22:32, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinates

When the | coordinates = parameter is used (to display both lat/long at the top of the page and the location map), but the display=inline option is not used (ie display=title only), it still leaves the label WGS84, but without any value displayed, eg here. It provides no topical information, looks untidy and unnecessarily extends the infobox. Is there any way to get rid of the label? -- Verbarson ^talk_edits 13:55, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]